Frank hears Bureau Met in DRM

drmlogoFrank writes:

Hello Thomas,

This afternoon I came across ‘Bureau Met’ on 5960 [kHz]. I have been listening since 0800Z today, 24th Feb. SNR is a constant 19/20dB (RNZI peaks at about 17 on a good day. ). Content is a speech by Martin Luther King, ‘ one small step for mankind’, a speech by Churchill, more Apollo mission, Bill Clinton apologizing to the nation, and similar stuff repeating about every 40 minutes..

I suspect this is a Radio Australia test tx from their Canberra transmitter.

No station ID on the hour.

Cheers
Frank

Thanks, Frank! Has anyone else caught this DRM broadcast?

This entry was posted in DRM, News, Shortwave Radio and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Frank hears Bureau Met in DRM

  1. Jonathan Marks says:

    what a waste of energy resources. I was involved with the first DRM tests in 1996. Hasn’t the medium been tested enough? It works, The only problem is that it is a solution to a problem that no longer exists. When will they get the memo?

  2. Dall McKenzie says:

    I agree with Jonathan a WASTE of Energy Resources.!!!. If it works why fix it.

  3. vimal oberoi says:

    We in India are investing a lot in DRM transmission/trials.But where are the receivers available,if any?

    • Thomas says:

      Vimal, you have a point. It is a “cart before the horse” situation. I love the idea of DRM–something akin to satellite radio without satellites. However, only computer/receiver combos have proven effective so far at decoding DRM for many of us. I use the RadioJet.

      With the number of DRM transmitters you’ll have in India, perhaps it will be quite easy. Until we have a small, effective and inexpensive DRM radio, the mode stands no chance of adoption amongst listeners. It’s hard to believe it’s been out there over a decade (more or less) on the broadcasting side, yet only now portables are showing up. It takes optimistic broadcasters to invest in the technology, at least used over the shortwaves.

  4. Nigel Holmes says:

    Steady on Jonathon & Dall – garner some facts before having a dump.
    1. It’s not a Radio Australia broadcast or even an ABC broadcast. Doesn’t “Bureau Met” give everyone a clue?
    2. In this instance it is a solution to problem, but not an international broadcast problem.

    Standby for further information.

  5. Nigel Holmes says:

    Apologies Jonathan for mis-spelling.
    I also meant to add
    3. “…WASTE of Energy Resources.!!!. ” => at the ~1 kW mean level I don’t think so.

    • My point was that there have been hours of DRM transmissions broadcast to “test” the technology and they haven’t led to the system being adopted as a replacement for analogue HF. That has failed. As a back-up system for satellite distribution (or to replace it in certain areas) , the way RNZI uses DRM, seems an excellent use of resources. Bureau Met sounds more like a B-to-B service. So curious to know what is being tested. I remember a conversation in Melbourne when we discussed the challenges of propagation in the outback, especially during extreme heat, and how DRM could be a robust communications medium.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


9 + = eighteen

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>