Klaus demonstrates his folding mag loop antenna

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Klaus Boecker, who follows up after our recent post showcasing his homebrew magnetic loop antenna.

One of the cool things about Klaus’ antenna is that he can easily position it vertically (see above), or fold it over into a horizontal position (see below).

While one would think Klaus would get optimal performance from his loop while vertically-oriented, it’s not always the case. Klaus has discovered that on some frequencies, placing the antenna in the horizontal position lowers the noise level and increases the target signal’s strength.

To demonstrate, Klaus made the following short video for us:

Click here to view on YouTube.

That’s a pretty amazing difference, Klaus! I’m no antenna expert, but perhaps what’s happening is you’re eliminating noise that is polarized in the plane of your antenna, thus the signal “pops out” much better when oriented horizontally?

I’m curious if any readers can explain this.   I know very little about loop antennas–especially small loops since so much of their surroundings affect their performance.

Thanks for sharing, Klaus!

6 thoughts on “Klaus demonstrates his folding mag loop antenna

  1. Tha Dood

    Most made-made noises are vertical in polarization, so by going horizontal you can attenuate those noises as much as 20dB. I couldn’t see the VID, but is that a Kenwood R1000? Those are fun receivers.

    Reply
  2. N7MSD

    There are MANY references to mag loops these days as they have become quite popular for transmitting as well as the traditional reception. I recently bought a Chameleon F-Loop+ that I hope to put in service shortly (though admittedly, if I had the tools, I could have constructed a much better one for all that $$$).

    I re-read this link: http://www.aa5tb.com/loop.html

    Basically, there are a few things that could be going on–likely a combination.

    1. Polarization, as mentioned by Dood above: it’s one reason why TV and some FM broadcast stations use horizontal, as it’s less affected by noise. A second is that it travels further in V/UHF due to better knife-edge diffraction and other factors. (Very different from LW/MW/AM ground waves.) However, some places may have more horizontal polarized wiring (like the motel I work at) than others, so YMMV.

    2. Small mag loops, as the glorified tank circuits they are, have a much smaller “near field” than that for regular E-field antennas. I put “near field” in quotes because, in this case, it’s the actual magnetic induction field which Steve above states extends only around 1/10th (0.1) wavelength away. HOWEVER, he also states his experiments show that the loop responds to the *E*-field primarily between 1/10th and one wavelength away! Thus, for close-in sources the loop can simply be rotated like any other inductor to vastly reduce coupling (to near zero), like to wires, but this won’t work for more distant objects where the best you can hope for is your cross-pol loss. Speaking of which,

    3. Steve states above that, except for vertical mounting very near the ground (which, contrary to pretty much all others, appears to be very good thing for this antenna, especially if the ground is good), the polarization is very “dirty” (my word), meaning you get both. Thus you’ll still have both even if you mount horizontal. The difference is that now your null is pointed straight up and down. Klaus is on an upper floor so if the noise is directly below the antenna, going horizontal would kill it dead, especially if not radiating back into the building wiring. This is no different than nulling using the loop-stick in your AM/MW/LW radio, but, if built correctly, the nulls should be sharper.

    Hope this helps!

    Reply
  3. London Shortwave

    Great setup! I discovered much the same thing regarding the horizontal positioning of my loop antenna, it made the difference between Radio Australia being essentially inaudible indoors and a SINPO Overall of 3:

    http://blog.londonshortwave.com/2015/10/radio-hacking-reliable-radio-australia.html

    I later found out that the source of interference on that frequency was (is!) indeed directly below me, so I would agree with the noise polarisation hypothesis.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Listening across the globe: The 2017 BBC Antarctic Midwinter Broadcast | The SWLing Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *