Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, James Copeland (KDØICP), who writes:
Hi Thomas,
Hope you are doing well. A few years ago, I sent you a story about radio dramas we were doing on my college radio station, KSDB in Manhattan, KS. Well, I’m now working at KGGF in Coffeyville, KS, continuing the tradition on this heritage AM station.
Earlier this month, we broadcast a community Christmas program to benefit our local theater in town that is being restored. The broadcast featured two old-time radio dramas and local music. Coffeyville, KS is a small town with a population under 9,000, but it has one of the oldest and largest radio stations in the area. 10 KW day and 5 KW night on 690 kHz. I thought some in your audience might enjoy trying to tune in Christmas morning at 8 a.m. CST for the rebroadcast of the program. A link for more information and the audio as well is available here:
https://kggfradio.com/local-news/721426
For those who are interested in the technical details of the broadcast, I used two ribbon mics and the main microphones, an RCA 77-DX and an RCA BK-11. The room acoustics proved to be a bit of a challenge with the final mix, but the whole thing was live with no edits and while it was far from perfect, I think the genuine nature of the community program shines through. The signal was sent to the station using a VHF Marti remote pickup unit. This particular recording was made at the station.
Also, if your readers are interested in submitting QSL reports, I would be glad to answer them. We usually get a few throughout the year, and I especially enjoyed a report early this year from some of the serious DXers in Norway!
Merry Christmas and 73!
James Copeland, KDØICP
Many thanks, James, for sharing this here on the SWLing Post. We all love a good radio production! It’s brilliant that you’ve brought this tradition to Coffeyville, KS!
I’ve also linked to the audio file of the broadcast below:
Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Jerome van der Linden, who writes seeking a bit of help:
Hello Thomas,
From time to time I see you’ve tried to ID receivers used in movies etc. I have a slightly different request that I hope you may pass on…
I’m trying to restore an old AM/SW radio for a friend and only know that its brand is a Howard radio who built sets in the US and in Melbourne, Australia. But I don’t know its model number and the tubes (valves here) are not all identifiable.
The chassis has numbers printed on it adjacent to the tubes AZ3 (with a Y2GT tube in its socket); AL3; ABC1 plus a couple of others. The four front control knobs appear to be volume, AM/SW band selector, tuning job (which drives a set of gears connected to the dual gang variable capacitor tuner), and what I assume is the tone control. There does not appear to be a power switch. Apart from tubes, I’m keen to confirm what my physical inspection of the 16 or so capacitors, in fact, are supposed to be so that I can source replacements.
The radio also has a toggle switch on the back, which I think switches the input between radio and an external gramophone. The loud speaker appears to be of the type with 4 conductors, where two are probably powering an electro magnet for the speaker. (I have also emailed the Steven Johnson web site for information, as he seems to store a lot of schematics for download.)
Thanks in advance.
Jerome van der Linden
Readers: If you can help Jerome, please comment!
Many thanks to SWLing Post and SRAA contributor, Dan Greenall, who shares the following guest post:
by Dan Greenall
MANY of us who are licensed [Canadian] amateurs can appreciate the fact that we are no longer subject to an annual licence renewal fee. As of April 1, 2000, that practice was discontinued by Industry Canada as a new streamlined authorization procedure was put in place for the amateur radio service. This came as a pleasant surprise to many who were paying $24 per annum per licence up until that point.
What many of us may not realize is that, prior to 1953, Canada had a licensing system in place for your radio receiver. Under the Radiotelegraph Act of 1913, a government minister (for most of this period, the Minister of Marine and Fisheries) had the power to license radio broadcasting stations and to charge a $1 licence fee on each receiving set. By 1929 three hundred thousand licenses were bought at $1.00 each.
An article appearing on the Friends of Canadian Broad- casting website a few years ago stated that the annual licence fee for receiving sets doubled to $2.00 in 1930. It was also noted that this was a lot of money during the Depression days that followed and two bucks could buy more than 40 loaves of bread. As a result, so the story goes, “harassed citizens” would try to outwit approaching government collectors by passing word along in time for their neighbours to shut off their radios and lock their doors.
During much of this period, radios that were made in Canada bore a “Warning” sticker such as the one in the accompanying photo. It stated that anyone convicted of operating the receiving set without first having obtained the proper licence could be liable to be fined for up to $25 and have their equipment confiscated. As noted in the book Radios of Canada by Lloyd Swackhammer, the penalty in 1924 was $50.
As you can see from the attached copies, such licences were being issued by the Department of Marine Radio Branch in 1936. In 1937, it was the responsibility of the Department of Transport – Radio Division.
Then in 1938, the DOT upped the fee to $2.50. It was another 15 years until this practice was finally abandoned.
So the next time you sit back and flip on the switch of your receiver, you might now have a greater appreciation of a privilege that most of us now take for granted.
Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, friend, and political cartoonist Carlos Latuff, who shares the following guest post:
by Carlos Latuff
Back in the 90s, I used the fax machine a lot, I even had one in my house, sending messages and cartoons to my clients and even to live TV shows (see the video example below). Lots of fun!
But for me, the fax only worked through the phone line.
It was only in 2020, during the covid-19 pandemic, that I, by chance, during one of my radio listening sessions, came across a strange signal that I would only later discover was a radiofax.
It was then that I realized that several meteorological agencies around the world broadcast synoptic charts and satellite images to vessels on the seas by radiofax, and that there was a Japanese news agency (the only one left in the world) that broadcast daily news to fishing boats and cargo ships: Kyodo News.
I was fascinated by that!
And I started tuning to the frequency of 16971 kHz USB (16970 in fact, to properly receive images) using basically my Xhdata D-808 and its telescopic antenna (now I use a 3-meter long wire antenna).
All the weather agencies I know broadcast at 120 lines per minute, while Kyodo News broadcasts at 60 lines. When I used to have a laptop, I had programs installed where I could adjust this cadence, like MixW, however, using an Android cell phone, the only application that works for radiofax is HF Weather Fax, which only decodes at 120 lines per minute (I had some problems with the app, which, being old, sometimes generated conflicts with Android and crash suddenly or even didn’t even open. Another bug is that after around 40 minutes of continuous decoding, the app stops). When you receive a radiofax at a rate of 60 lpm and decode it at 120 lpm, it’s as if you cut the image in half, vertically, and joined the two parts into one, mixing the letters.
I noticed that, when enlarging the image with my fingertips on the surface of the cell phone, while receiving the radiofax, I was able to see the right and left side of the image at a time, in an effect known in graphic arts as “moiré pattern”.
So, using HF Weather Fax I cannot download a Kyodo News radiofax in full (except when I receive the bulletin in English, the only time Kyodo News broadcasts in 120 lpm), but I can view parts of it and make print screens. And with these prints, I open them on Google translator app translating from Japanese to English. If image is in good quality, the translation is perfect.
Results I got were obtained from radio listening in Porto Alegre, Tramandaí beach in Rio Grande do Sul, and Urca beach in Rio de Janeiro, all located in Brazil. The best time has been late in the morning/early in the morning.
I’ve already obtained digital QSL cards from some meteorological agencies, such as those in Germany, Australia and Kagoshima in Japan, but Kyodo News doesn’t even respond to my emails.
But the main question is: why go to so much work to receive news via radiofax when you can easily receive it on the Internet through the Kyodo News website–?
Firstly, I’m nostalgic, receiving these radiofax has a touch of the past that I like to remember. And second, I believe that with the advancement of new satellite data transmission technologies, it’s only a matter of time before radiofax disappears as means of communication for vessels on the high seas. This is already happening!
Remember the end of radiofax transmissions from the New Zealand meteorological agency MetService this year?
So I’m enjoying the radiofax, before it ends!
The following are reports from some of my listening/decoding sessions: Continue reading
Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Bob Butterfield, who shares the following guest post:
By Bob Butterfield
As many radio enthusiasts have experienced there are some pieces of equipment that come and go for a variety of reasons. Many times, there are regrets about radios or accessories that are here one day and then gone another. Years ago, I was gifted a Sony ICF-8000 “Super Sensitive” FM/MW/SW portable radio. My ICF-8000 was one of those that “went.” To tell you the truth, I am not actually sure where it went off to! In those days I used my “Super Sensitive” radio on vacation trips, on the back deck, and for local MW/FM and casual SW listening. When a new position with the Government necessitated relocation, I left this radio behind at my parents’ house where it was regularly used by my mother in the kitchen. That is when things get fuzzy. Suffice it to say that I am not sure what happened to it.
As far as I can determine, the Sony ICF-8000 is a close relative of the earlier Sony TFM-8000W, another “Super Sensitive” model. What sets them apart is that the Sony TFM-8000W has the Public Service Band (PSB) and the Sony ICF-8000 does not. The ICF-8000 has its SW bands spread out into 4 bands: 1.6 to 3.5, 3.5-7, 7-14, and 14-26.1 MHz. In contrast the TFM-8000W has a slightly shorter SW frequency range split into three bands: 1.6-4, 4-10, and 10-22 MHz. Both radios have continuous coverage with no gaps from MW to SW as well as FM. These radios are almost identical in appearance. Other than the PSB and three SW bands on the TFM-8000W, the only other visual differences from the ICF-8000 are how the bands are arranged, identification of the Public Service Band on the face plate, and the addition of an on/off squelch toggle switch for the PSB. Internally the TFM-8000W has a couple more semi-conductors. In line with these two radios is the older Sony TFM-1600W “Super Sensitive” which came out circa 1971, has its own distinctive but similar appearance, and is set up like the ICF-8000 with FM/MW/SW.
A while ago the “I used to have that radio nostalgia bug” hit me, and I have been searching since for a decent ICF-8000 to purchase. Sony TFM-8000Ws in decent shape are up for sale on eBay on occasion, but I was looking for the ICF-8000. Finally, I spotted one recently (which was listed as a TFM-8000W!) at a price and condition I was comfortable with. After negotiation with the seller, I purchased it. There is some useful information on the Web about the Sony TFM-8000W. Jay Allen has a good piece on this unit worth checking out. The Sony ICF-8000 appears to be much harder to find, information on the Web is skimpier, and I am not sure how long they were produced. It is quite possible that its production run was limited. Manufacturing likely started in 1976 when it probably replaced the Sony TFM-8000W. One reference I located on the Web listed the ICF-8000 being made as early as 1974 but provided no source. I also found evidence of at least two versions of ICF-8000s being produced; one with a switch located in the battery compartment allowing multiple different voltages including that for Japan, and one operating on 120 volts only. The corresponding model number identification panels on the rear are annotated accordingly with voltages available. Both versions have “FM/AM Multiband Receiver” lettering on the face plate. Sony, like Panasonic, often tweaked models for domestic and foreign markets, adding or modifying features to fit those markets accordingly. If anyone has more information on these models, year(s) manufactured, availability of free manual copies, etc., drop them in the comments section.
The Sony ICF-8000 I purchased was in very good shape having just some minor imperfections showing on the faceplate paint. No cleaning was necessary, nevertheless I gave it one. All switches were quiet and functioned as they should. A nice feature of the ICF-8000 is its exceptionally smooth tuning mechanism which utilizes a flywheel. In addition, on my radio, the tuning scale is practically spot-on on all the bands. Not usually the case in an analog set of this type forty-five plus years old. When added to the fact that the SW frequencies are spread out in four bands instead of three, tuning is easy. The presence of a fine-tuning knob is a nice touch and can be useful. Also available is a tone control knob, signal/battery strength meter, a lighted dial, AC/DC capability, external antenna connection, world time calculator wheel (at the rear on the battery compartment cover), and a dual FM AFC and AM Broad/Sharp bandwith control.
Nostalgia aside, the Sony ICF-8000 has provided reliable performance on all bands so far. MW sensitivity is adequate while SW reception is above average using the built-in telescoping antenna which measures 44 inches (111.75 cm) in length. I did a limited shortwave reception comparison in the 49-meter band between the ICF-8000 and the Panasonic RF-2600 with its 37 inch (94 cm) built-in telescoping antenna and found the Sony performing equally with the Panasonic; at times even better perhaps due to its longer antenna. When connected to an external 75-foot (22.86 meters) longwire I found the ICF-8000 shortwave reception to be particularly good. I did not experience any overloading, nor did I encounter multiple images. The sound was, as others have attributed to the TFM-8000W, “mellow”. If this is not to your liking on the shortwave bands the tone adjustment is useful. Noise levels were well tolerated. I suspect that the Sony TFM-8000W would perform similarly.
Is the Sony ICF-8000 a fantastic DX machine? No, it is not. Is it “super sensitive”? Maybe not “super,” but definitely above average, and surely sensitive enough for general listening. Is it an attractive, affordable classic, easy to use, and sturdy radio with decent performance that can hold up through the years? I think so. Does it bring back fond memories? Absolutely!
Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Perry Lusk (KG7YC), who writes:
I spotted this on an old “B” rated film:
Might be more fun to identify the movie than the Zenith Transoceanic we all know.
The answer is The Alligator People (1959). The man is diagnosed with a fatal medical problem and try’s getting an experimental procedure that involves alligator DNA and later turns into a, you guessed it, an alligator!
Wow! That sounds like a wild ride for the protagonist!
So we may all recognize a Transoceanic when we see one, but does anyone know the exact model? Feel free to comment!
