Tag Archives: Microtelecom Perseus

Meeting WavViewDX Developer Reinhard Weiß, and Visiting Akihabara With Him (A Totsuka DXers Circle Article by Kazu Gosui)

Leave a reply

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Nick Hall-Patch, who has kindly provided a translation of this article from the Japanese-language publication PROPAGATION by the Totsuka DXers Circle (TDXC). Here, Kazu Gosui recounts his meeting with WavViewDX developer Reinhard Weiß during his visit to Tokyo .

Meeting WavViewDX developer Reinhard Weiß, and Visting Akihabara With Him

by Kazu Gosui

I first learned about WavViewDX in January of this year on the mailing list of the American radio club IRCA. It was described as “analysis software compatible with I/Q WAV recordings created with almost all SDR software,” so I was intrigued. I quickly downloaded it and tried it out, and I was immediately impressed.

In early February, I emailed the developer, asking, “I’m amazed at how easy it is to use and how powerful it is. It works fine with PERSEUS and AirSpy HF+, but are there any plans to support WiNRADiO’s DDC format?” Reinhard Weiß (hereafter referred to as Reinhard) responded that same day, “I’m actually currently working on adding support for WiNRADiO’s G33DDC. I should be able to send you a test version tomorrow.” The email carefully explained the import procedure and important points to note.

The text, the web page description, and the tone of the expression conveyed a sincere and attentive personality. The next day, I tried out the sample version and reported some concerns. Reinhard quickly fixed them, and where he couldn’t immediately fix them, he supported me by sending files via the cloud or screen capture videos. As I continued to request things like adding a shortcut for switching receive modes, I gradually became fascinated with WavViewDX and, before I knew it, became a heavy user.

The first email also asked, “I’m planning to visit Japan in May or June. Are there any ham or BCL (Broadcast Listener; SWL) events in Japan around that time?” In response, I suggested that if Reinhard could come to Tokyo, we could hold an offline meeting with members of TDXC! Through our exchange, I realized that Reinhard is quite knowledgeable about Japanese affairs. He knows Akihabara very well, and even knows Hard Off as a good place to get BCL radios. He loves hot springs and enjoys talking about Japanese food. When I asked him, “Is your wife Japanese by any chance?” he replied, “Yes.” No wonder he’s so knowledgeable! He should have told me sooner! (lol) So, we made an appointment for an offline meeting in Akihabara, Tokyo, in late May.

On the day, we met at the Electric Town exit of JR Akihabara Station. Our four attendees were Hiroo Nakagawa, Satoshi Miyauchi, Fumiaki Minematsu and myself. When I arrived at the meeting point five minutes early, they were already there. When I asked him, “Excuse me, Reinhard-san?” he replied, “Yes, that’s right,” in Japanese. His Japanese was fluent! Up until now, emails had been in English, as I don’t speak German, so I had no choice but to communicate in English… I was completely surprised because I had been counting on the others and Google Translate on my smartphone to converse in English! You should have told me sooner, Reinhard! (lol) Needless to say, from then on, the entire conversation was in Japanese. The meeting venue was a pub near the station. He could read the Japanese menu, and thanks to his wife, who is apparently a good cook, Japanese food was also OK, so no problem.

We spoke about radio and BCL. Reinhard started medium wave DX about three years ago.  He has been interested in radio since he was a child and actually worked as a BCL radio broadcaster. He has had a long career. His job is developing debuggers for testing and verifying the operation of in-vehicle electronic devices and measuring instruments. He says that both his work and his hobby are focused on developing easy-to-use hardware and software integration. He developed WavViewDX while studying the programming language Python, and runs it at home using two PERSEUS devices.

He said he would be happy if many people use it. Currently, WavViewDX has 200 users, 25 of whom are active worldwide. Incidentally, the mailing list has 102 subscribers (as of June 10, 2025).

Over lunch, we had the opportunity to use WavViewDX on the PC we brought with us, and it was extremely valuable to have the developer himself explain how to use it, provide an overview of its functions, and explain the development concept.  We also received copies of the German BCL magazine “Radio-Kurier” (a radio delivery service?). This magazine apparently publishes an astounding 2,000 copies per month, demonstrating the depth of Germany’s BCL population. The most active BCLs are few, and 80% of the articles are written by one person. That’s impressive.

The second half of the meeting was a tour of Akihabara’s famous shops. We visited the Radio Center rental showcase, Uchida Radio, Radio Department Store, Rocket, Fuji Musen, and Akizuki Denshi. Reinhard has a keen interest in vintage Japanese BCL radios and boomboxes, and his eyes lit up as he looked at rare radios and boomboxes. At Uchida Radio, he even negotiated the price of a radio cassette player he was interested in.    Unfortunately, the deal fell through, but he apparently toured Hard Off stores around Tokyo the next day, so he must be a die-hard enthusiast. He also seemed to love the Fuji Wireless and Akizuki Electronics stores on the second floor, saying, “Their unique products are what keeps them going, and I can see why they’ve survived.” He bought a large breadboard (brand new!) for 50 yen on the second floor of Akizuki and then we took a break for tea in the cafe.

We had a great time chatting there, too. Reinhard is, in a word, a nice guy. A German who speaks Japanese, loves radio and BCL, and develops software for BCL—an extremely rare and valuable person. He’s fluent enough in Japanese to even tell jokes, and he’d laugh along with us at our old-man jokes. He was friendly and fun to talk to, and we shared the same values as fellow enthusiasts. It felt like we were old friends.

He apparently returns to Japan every year with his wife, but he hasn’t done a DX expedition yet. Maybe the next one will be the Chigasaki expedition?! So we parted ways, hoping to see each other again next year.

(l-r: Kazu Gosui, Satoshi Miyauchi, Hiroo Nakagawa, Reinhard Weiß, Fumiaki Minematsu) —Hiroo Nakagawa photo

(l-r: Kazu Gosui, Hiroo Nakagawa, Reinhard Weiß, Satoshi Miyauchi) —Fumiaki Minematsu photo

These English translations were prepared for IRCA’s DX Monitor, and are used with the kind permission of  IRCA as well as of the authors and the editor of the Totsuka DXers Circle publication, PROPAGATION.

Ultra Convenient, The Benefits of WavViewDX: Visualizing Reception Conditions (A Totsuka DXers Circle Article by Satoshi Miyauchi)

1 Reply

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Nick Hall-Patch, who has kindly provided a translation of this article from the Japanese-language publication PROPAGATION by the Totsuka DXers Circle (TDXC). In this piece, Satoshi Miyauchi explores how WavViewDX can revolutionize SDR analysis by making propagation and reception conditions instantly visible–and shares some remarkable reception examples.

“Ultra” Convenient, The Benefits of WavViewDX: Visualizing Reception Conditions 

by Satoshi Miyauchi

After recording bands using SDR’s such as Perseus or HF Discovery, I was informed by Kazu Gosui via email of a new program that’s “ultra” convenient for analyzing them. When monitoring in real time with Perseus, I have a general memory and notes of what was received at what time.  However, when recording reception data without real-time monitoring, such as during nighttime hours, verifying and analyzing the data across all frequencies takes time. Knowledge and intuition about where to listen are also important elements. While all of this is a skill, I believe that previous tools have been unable to provide a comprehensive view of the day’s conditions. Since I started using WavViewDX, I’ve been using it every morning, efficiently analyzing the SDR recordings I’ve collected.

By the way, recently I’ve been using a timer (the “Scheduler” of SDR Console) to check if the TWR-Africa signal transmitted from Benin, West Africa, is reaching me in the middle of the night. My analysis showed a significant reduction in the time required for confirmation that TWR-Africa was being received before and after WavViewDX was installed, and I’d like to share this with you.

Just to be clear, this article is not intended to be a tedious rehash of the user manual. Rather, it is intended to provide useful, pinpointed tips for use.

  1. I’ll introduce a method I think might be best based on my current setup.
  2. I’ll share some reception reports from my recent morning routine.
  3. I’ll touch on the mysteries of radio wave propagation, a realization I believe is unique to WavViewDX.

But first, a word about WavViewDX: seeing is believing. As shown in the sample image in Figure 5, it visually displays the status of stations received at each frequency, using green bars or white lines, in chronological order, from the lowest frequency band (left) to the highest (right). You can even customize it to analyze North and South America at 10 kHz intervals for TP reception.

The author is Reinhard Weiß from Germany (please see accompanying related articles).  It is an incredibly easy-to-use and intuitive software. Once you start using it, you’ll definitely want to keep it.

Figure 5

First, let’s assume you’ll be importing and analyzing data into WavViewDX.

1.) Timer Reception Tips, Using SDR Console

This is a backward-thinking approach based on the fact that WavViewDX can import files in “folders.” The golden rule is simply to store all files from a single session in a single folder. I’ve been using SDR Console as my primary SDR program for a while now, so when I register a scheduler (for timer scheduling), I click “Add date (yyyy-mm-dd) subfolder” under “Folder”, in Figure 6. This allows me to import the entire folder of recording files from that day into WavViewDX, saving me a lot of time. WavViewDX has a “Select Whole Folder” button, which allows me to import files into WavViewDX with a single click (Figure 7). How amazing! Incidentally, I set up bandwidth recording files to be stored in separate 1GB files. The moment I wake up, the files are instantly imported into WavViewDX, allowing me to quickly check the conditions from midnight to dawn before work.

Figure 6

Figure 7

2) TWR-Africa Reception Recording

Even on shortwave, it’s rare to see signals from Africa, let alone on mediumwave. Until a few years ago, I thought this was impossible. However, I discovered that I could record pre-dawn signals from Africa on my home K9AY loop, including the VOA of the Sao Tome and Principe relay on 1530kHz, as well as the famous TWR Africa (Benin) on 1476kHz. Of course, it’s not easy to receive signals every day, so I was not motivated to record them regularly However, after installing WavViewDX, I was able to easily grasp the pre-dawn conditions, and I set up a scheduler to record as many times as possible every day.

Then, one morning, right around 3:30 AM, on the morning of the March vernal equinox, I noticed a very clear bar on the 1476kHz using WavViewDX (Figure 8). By working in conjunction with WavViewDX, it automatically checks offsets in exact carrier frequency being received against the MWList database, and the > mark quickly lights up in WavViewDX, indicating that it’s TWR Africa! I was surprised when I heard the audio. I was impressed by the exceptionally clear reception. There was a slight beat, and it seemed like at least one other carrier was also in the mix. How such clear audio managed to reach and be heard across nearly 13,300 km as the crow flies is a mystery, but it’s still a moving experience.

Figure 8

I asked @lft_kashima LFT Kashima Fishing Radio, who regularly posts information on X, and he said that the signal wasn’t as good on that day at his location. Since we’re both in the Kanto region and a little farther apart, perhaps that’s the problem, or perhaps it’s just the antenna. He uses a north-south loop antenna, while I use a vertical AOR SA-7000.

While I don’t know the full reason or answer, one possible guess: – Wasn’t the arrival direction north-south? – Did it arrive through a duct somewhere? However, there’s no way to know why the duct ended up at this receiving point. It’s a wonder that I was able to receive such a DX station at this point in the solar cycle, when the number of sunspots is almost at its maximum and the A/K Index was far from calm. This makes daily reception all the more meaningful. It’s a moment that makes me admire nature, the work of radio wave propagation.  I was able to receive this station again in April, and the links to those two results from 1476kHz – TWR Africa are below:

3) The Mysteries of Radio Wave Propagation Discovered Only with WavViewDX

WaveViewDX already clearly shows the reception status on the vertical time axis, but just before the vernal equinox, a phenomenon in which the propagation conditions deteriorated simultaneously across multiple frequencies occurred, albeit for a short period of time. (Audio Sample https://youtu.be/XhXSQFiGQeo) What is this? Figure 9 shows the actual situation at my location on March 17, 2025, after 18:00 UTC.

Figure 9

  1. 1278kHz JOFR Fukuoka RKB Mainichi Broadcasting System 50kw (about 900km distance, 245°)
  2. 1287kHz JOHR Sapporo HBC Hokkaido Broadcasting System 50kw (about 1000km distance, 340°)
  3. 1332kHz JOSF Nagoya Tokai Broadcasting System 50kw (about 270km distance, 270°)

(*Note: The leftmost bar (1242kHz in the Kanto region) is attenuated with a notch filter)

One of the benefits of WavViewDX is that it visually showed the simultaneous drop in signal strength from domestic and international stations, which had been arriving almost smoothly until 18:00 UTC.

I asked Perplexity AI and searched the literature. These possibilities were listed:

“Regarding the phenomenon of simultaneous attenuation of radio signals in all directions for several minutes during nighttime propagation in the medium frequency band (MF band),” it is believed to be primarily caused by the combined effects of the following factors: –

  • Ionospheric Variation Mechanism Sudden E-Layer (Es-Layer) Formation A localized increase in electron density in the upper E-layer of the ionosphere (at an altitude of 100-120 km) at night. This thin ionosphere strongly reflects signals, blocking the normal F-layer reflection path. One measurement data showed signal attenuation of up to 20 dB when the Es layer occurred.
  • F-layer altitude fluctuations: When the F layer (altitude 250-400 km), the main nighttime propagation path, rapidly rises due to thermal expansion, the reflection angle changes, creating a “propagation hole” that causes signals to deviate from the receiving point.
  • Earth’s magnetic field fluctuations disrupt the electron distribution in the ionosphere, causing a sudden increase in absorption.
  • Instantaneous changes in solar activity: The emission of X-rays and charged particles associated with solar flares suddenly changes the electron density in the ionosphere, destabilizing the reflection coefficient and resulting in short-term propagation loss.

Although it was able to provide various possible explanations, I was unable to perform any further verification of these answers myself.

These English translations were prepared for IRCA’s DX Monitor, and are used with the kind permission of  IRCA as well as of the authors and the editor of the Totsuka DXers Circle publication, PROPAGATION.

An Introduction to WavViewDX SDR Playback Software (A Totsuka DXers Circle Article by Kazu Gosui)

6 Replies

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Nick Hall-Patch, who has kindly provided a translation of this article from the Japanese-language publication PROPAGATION by the Totsuka DXers Circle (TDXC). In this piece, Kazu Gosui introduces WavViewDX, an impressive SDR file playback and analysis tool developed by Reinhard Weiß of Germany.

About WavViewDX, SDR File Playback Software

by Kazu Gosui

Introduction

“WavViewDX,” developed by Reinhard Weiß of Germany, is SDR file playback software. It maps the received signals from SDR-recorded files into bar graphs, with time on the vertical axis and frequency (channel) on the horizontal axis, for each of the following channel separations: medium wave (9/10 kHz), short wave (5 kHz), and FM (50/100 kHz).  Clicking the cursor (blue crosshair) plays the received audio. By “visualizing the received signal” through mapping (see also the separate article by Satoshi Miyauchi), you can see at a glance the start and end times of broadcasts, fade in, fade out, channels you should listen to, and channels you don’t need to listen to.

Basic Usage and Screen Description

First, download and install WavViewDX from the WavViewDX webpage (https://rweiss.de/dxer/tools.html). The latest version is version was 1544 as of June 8, 2025, when this was written, but version 1662 is available in October 2025. When you launch WavViewDX, the Main Window (Figure 1) will appear, showing Analysis View, the Operation/Settings Panel, Logbook and Database.

Figure 1

To play back recorded files, you must import them. Click Import to display the Import SDR Recording settings screen. Source files can be selected as single or multiple files, or by folder. Set the reception location, time, channel separation, etc., and begin importing. A progress percentage will appear, and green and white bar graphs will appear on the Analysis View screen. Hovering the cursor over a bar graph and clicking will display a red circle, and the audio recorded for that channel and time will play. Scrolling the mouse will allow you to zoom in and out of the Analysis View.

When you import, a WVD format file is created. Once you’ve imported the files, you can simply load the corresponding WVD file at another time, and the files will be available to play immediately.

In addition to Import and Load, the following settings are available at the top of the Main Window.

  • Analysis: Allows you to select the file/folder and frequency separation when importing.
  • Carrier Views: Displays offset frequencies to identify and estimate the received medium wave station.
  • Database: Links with the MWLIST webpage (https://www.mwlist.org/ul_login.php) to identify and estimate the received medium wave station.
  • Logbook: For documenting stations heard, along with creation of audio recordings during playback.
  • More: Allows you to set multiple options, such as manual tuning and contrast setting.
  • Setup: Allows you to set the sound device and select the file format for recording audio clips during playback.
  • About: Allows you to select the software version, Help, etc.

The Main Window also displays the frequency list linked to the aforementioned Database and the Logbook.  The database frequency list can be selected by region, such as Europe or East Asia. The Logbook allows you to record reception records and associate recorded audio files.

The right side of the Main Window contains the operation and settings panel. At the top are the Frequency Display and Spectrum View. Hovering the cursor over Spectrum View allows you to select PBT (Pass Band Tuning) and NOTCH.

Below these are:

  • Spectrum Zoom (x1, x2, x4), which expands the spectrum;
  • Bandpass Bandwidth Presets ([2.5] etc.), which change the reception bandwidth;
  • Player Time Controls (Play/Pause; -30s etc.), which control the playback time;
  • Carrier View, which displays the offset frequency; (+/- 30Hz, and can be shifted above and below the nominal .000 frequency)
  • Demodulator Modes, which change the reception mode.

(Keyboard shortcuts are available for the above functions.)

  • The AF Highpass Filter adjusts the audio frequency passband to improve intelligibility.
  • The Spike Filter reduces popping during reception.
  • Phasing combines two synchronized recording files to reduce same-frequency interference and noise.
  • NCE (Neighbor Channel Eliminator) reduces interference from adjacent channels.
  • Binaural allows you to select the sideband of the AF output during playback.
  • The AF Audio Recorder allows you to record by clicking during playback. Recording formats include WAV, FLAC, and MP3.

As you can see, there are so many features it’s impossible to introduce them all. Detailed adjustments to each function make it even easier to use; it may seem tedious at first, but give the features a try. The user interface is intuitive, so you’ll quickly get used to it. If you’re unsure how to use something, just press the F1 key and refer to the Help.

Actual Usage 

Let’s try it out. The import settings are set to MW 9+10kHz Channel Analysis Configuration. Configuration, and other settings are set to default. (editor’s note:  “SDR Calibration” allows the use of reference carrier frequencies in the data, for those SDRs without a frequency standard, so that each carrier frequency in the passband will be displayed accurately.)   Once the import is complete, a bar graph will appear. Figures 2 and 3 show the analysis view of the actual file import from early May 2025, during the Hachijojima DXpedition showing evening reception; time is UTC.

Figure 2

Figure 3

9kHz separation is used in Figure 2. You can hear the audio from 630kHz at the time indicated by a circle. Black areas of the bar graph indicate no signal, while white to green indicates good signal reception. If you miss an ID during reception, press the up arrow key to rewind the time by 5 seconds and listen again.   Click Recording to record the ID.

As you can see, the bar graph color changes from black to white and then white to green over time. This indicates that as the day turns from daytime to evening and then nighttime, channels that previously had no reception begin to receive broadcasts. Sunset on this day was 9:29 UTC (18:29 JST), and the received signal fade in was between 8:30 UTC (17:30 JST) and 9:15 UTC (18:15 JST).

Next, click Analysis and switch to MW 10kHz channel analysis. The Analysis View after switching is shown in Figure 3. This shows the reception status with 10kHz separation. Most channels are black, with a few white spots. There is very little green. In this image, there are certainly no 10kHz channels with good audio, but by clicking on the white, we can see some with faint English talk and music. I checked the database and found that these channels appear to be Hawaiian stations (see orange circle marks in Figure 3) that have been active since around 8:30 UTC.

Also, Latin music was heard on 1230 kHz (Orange circle in Figure 3). This may be Radio Dos from Argentina. By visualizing reception status like this, I was able to determine where to listen and where not to listen. During the Hachijojima expedition in May, I was blessed with outstanding reception conditions from the evening through the early morning hours of the following day, and was able to track 187 overseas medium wave stations, including 165 in Australia, 5 in New Zealand, 2 in Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Marshall Islands, Kiribati, Palau, Fiji, Tuvalu, Indonesia, and the Philippines, achieving significant results. Playback and analysis took about a week, which was shorter than usual, thanks to WavViewDX.

Summary 

As mentioned above, WavViewDX has proven to be an efficient tool for analysis, allowing users to discover previously unnoticed stations. Since it can play files recorded with various SDRs, we hope that many DXers will use it. WavViewDX is compatible with multiple PC operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, and is freeware. According to Reinhard Weiß, additional features and enhancements are planned for the future, so we look forward to seeing its future developments. Finally, we would like to express our gratitude and respect to Reinhard Weiß for developing such useful and excellent software.

Reference Materials 

Table 1. Supported IQ Formats

ELAD FDM-SW2 Generic RAW recordings
GQRX recordings HDSDR
Jaguar Linrad RAW, single and dual-channel
recordings PERSEUS (*.wav)
PERSEUS P22 (*.P22) SDR#
SDR Console SDR Uno
SDRconnect SpectraVue
WiNRADiO DDC WiNRADiO RXW (only for G33)
Winrad

Trying WavViewDX on FM 

WavViewDX is primarily geared toward medium wave DX, but it seems like it can be used for FM DX as well. The image in Figure 4 shows reception from 79-87MHz using an RSPdx-R2 and an indoor YouTwin antenna. It supports stereo and has good audio quality. With an outdoor antenna, it could also be used for FM DX, such as with sporadic E and other short-lived propagation enhancements.

Figure 4

These English translations were prepared for IRCA’s DX Monitor, and are used with the kind permission of  IRCA as well as of the authors and the editor of the Totsuka DXers Circle publication, PROPAGATION.

EladUSA now selling the Perseus with factory support from Microtelecom

3 Replies

Many thanks to Paul Jones with EladUSA who notes that they now sell the venerable Microtelecom Perseus via their online store. Paul also notes that each purchase comes with full factory support from Microtelecom. Price is $760 US.

Click here to view at EladUSA.

Microtelecom Perseus SDRs at Ham Radio Outlet

3 Replies

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Brian Penney, who writes:

I saw your post about the availability of the Perseus SDR. They are still available brand new through HRO. I ordered one in the fall of 2019.

HRO said they were getting them new from SSB-Electronic GmbH in Germany.

Click here to view at HRO.

Thanks for the tip, Brian! The price is quite competitive at $749.95 US as well–certainly the best option for those of us living in the US.

New Microtelecom Perseus SDRs on eBay

6 Replies

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who notes that an eBay vendor in Italy is selling new inventory of the benchmark Microtelecom Perseus SDR. The price is 883.66 Euro or roughly $975 US. 

I have gotten a lot of inquiries about the Perseus over the past few years since it’s more difficult to find ones new-in-box. It appears this vendor has at least ten units and a 99.3% rating with almost 800 eBay reviews. The seller allows for a thirty day return period and they also pay return shipping. If you’ve been looking for a new Perseus, this may be worth considering.

Click here to view on eBay.

SDR Primer Part 3: From High-End SDR Receivers to SDR Transceivers

18 Replies

The following article originally appeared in the October 2018 issue of The Spectrum Monitor magazine:

Welcome back to the world of SDRs once again

In September we began of our three-part Primer on Software-Defined Radios (SDRs). Part One (September) focused on the nomenclature and components of a functioning SDR system; Part Two (October) took a look at some affordable SDR station options that will propel you into the world of SDRs for less than $200 US. This month, in Part Three––our final installation––we’ll dive a little deeper into the SDR rabbit hole, and investigate higher-end SDRs as well as ham radio transceivers with embedded SDRs.

Investing in SDR hardware

As we mentioned in Part 2 of our primer, gaining entry into the world of SDRs can be quite affordable. With merely $200 or less, you can fully explore the radio spectrum with an SDR that has truly excellent performance characteristics.

So, why would you pay more?

Let’s consider this.  If, say, you happen to live in an RF-dense environment, such as a busy city, if you live near strong broadcaster(s), and/or if you’re a DXer who’s seeking benchmark performance, then you might wish to devote a little more of your cash to your SDR hardware.

When you pay more for an SDR, the additional cost is typically going toward the hardware rather than the software. Indeed, my favorite SDR (software) applications are absolutely free, and pair with a number of benchmark SDRs. But good hardware is vital to performance. The lineup of SDRs––that is, the receiver hardware––discussed below typically has better filtering, preselectors, shielding, and receiver architecture focused on HF performance. They also tend to offer a more robust front end, lower noise floor, and better dynamic range. All of this, of course, results in better performance overall. Some of these SDRs also offer unique specialty features, like built-in web servers.

The following SDRs are carefully hand selected, and in my view, represent a balance between price and performance. And again, this is by no means a comprehensive list; it’s simply a selection of what you’ll find currently available on the SDR market.

So, without further ado, we’ll begin our discussion with “black box” SDRs, then move on to  SDR transceivers and transceivers with embedded SDRs.

SDRplay RSPduo

The SDRplay RSPduo

In May of this year (2018), the UK-based SDR designer and manufacturer SDRplay released their latest receiver: the SDRplay RSPduo.

What sets this little black box apart from the competition is just what its name implies:  the duo is a dual tuner SDR.  In other words, it’s two independent SDRs rolled into one.

Being the price leader in the world of SDRs, SDRplay retails the RSPduo for $279.95. And, I must add, it’s a true bargain for a feature-packed 14-bit high-performance device.

The RSPduo’s tuners can operate individually, anywhere between 1kHz and 2GHz, with up to 10MHz of working bandwidth. You could also set up the RSPduo so that both tuners can operate simultaneously, again between 1kHz and 2GHz, with up to 2MHz of bandwidth per tuner. The RSPduo has a high-stability reference along with external clocking features which makes this SDR an affordable option for industrial, scientific, as well as educational applications. It’s housed in a quality steel enclosure.

SDRplay’s development team is already working on new features such as true diversity reception, which will be included as a free upgrade to their popular SDRuno proprietary application.

To be clear, there is no other sub-$300 SDR on the market that currently has true dual-tuner functionality. Thus, the RSPduo is a good value, in my opinion––and an inexpensive upgrade to a proper dual-receiver SDR––so if this is something you’d like to add to your shack, go ahead!  Bite the bullet, and acquire an RSPduo. Likely you won’t regret it.

Check out the RSPduo via:

KiwiSDR

Photo by Mark Fahey

Like the RSPduo, the KiwiSDR has a unique feature that makes it stand out among the other receivers mentioned here: it is designed to be fully controlled via a web-browser-based SDR application. Not only can you use your KiwiSDR locally, but you can share it with the world via the KiwiSDR network. You can configure the KiwiSDR to allow up to eight simultaneous guest users, assuming only that you have access to the modest amount of Internet bandwidth this requires.

The KiwiSDR ships as a simple modular kit, and requires no special tools to assemble: the SDR is a custom circuit board (known as a “cape”) that you connect to BeagleBone Green or BeagleBone Black mini computer. (Click here to learn more about the BeagleBone).

The KiwiSDR is available in two versions: the SDR cape, alone, and a more complete version which includes the SDR cape, BeagleBone computer, enclosure, and GPS antenna. Both versions include all SDR software loaded on a micro-SD card.

Although the KiwiSDR might sound like an experimenter’s receiver since it requires a degree of assembly and configuration––at least, a bit more so than the other units I review here––it’s actually fairly simple to assemble, install, and put on the air. In fact, the only challenge that you might face is that of setting up your router for global access to your KiwiSDR. It does require either a static IP address or (more commonly) an IP address forwarding service. Check out the support documentation in advance to make sure your Internet connection will work.

The KiwiSDR covers from 10 kHz to 30 MHz, thus is not a wideband receiver like the SDRduo. Like the SDRs that follow, it focuses its performance on HF and lower bands.

I find it incredible that for just $299 US, you can purchase the full KiwiSDR kit––one that includes everything you need to put your SDR on the air and online. Because of this, I believe the KiwiSDR has become the dominant web SDR platform currently on the market. Perhaps this remarkable fact overshadows the fact that the KiwiSDR is also a superb performer, touting a brilliant dynamic range as well as overall excellent sensitivity and selectivity.

As my friend and fellow radio listener Mark Fahey, an early adopter of the KiwiSDR, is quick to point out, the KIwiSDR is unique in that it doesn’t connect to a PC or other computer to operate. It’s a stand-alone:  just connect an antenna, DC supply, and network cable, then you’re ready to go. All of the “work” is delivered by the piggyback BeagleBone CPU.

What’s not to love? While the web-based SDR application is full-featured, it does lack spectrum recording and some other advanced controls. This is due to the relatively modest processing power of the onboard CPU. That said, The KiwiSDR application does contain features/functionality via extensions that are fairly impressive.

Additionally, when updates are rolled out for the KiwiSDr application, these take effect globally. Only recently, for example, audio recording and amazing TDoA (Time Distance of Arrival) functionality were added.

Oh, and one more thing before we move on: the KiwiSDR is the only SDR I know that is exclusively controlled by a web-based SDR application for both the online guest and the local user/owner. There is no separate downloadable application.  Thus, whether you’re using your own local KiwiSDR or an online SDR, the user experience is exactly the same. It’s seamless and user-friendly…just as it should be.

Want to try the KiwiSDR before purchasing? Easy! You can browse and select any one of two hundred KiwiSDRs online on SDR.hu.

Check out the KiwiSDR via:

ELAD FDM-S2/FDM-S3

Italian-based SDR manufacturer, ELAD, has built a solid reputation over the years for truly pushing the SDR performance envelope in the $500-$1000 market.

I have owned their Elad FDM-S2 for four years now (check out my full review in the November 2014 issue of The Spectrum Monitor). The FDM-S2 continues to impress and to hold its own among more recent competitors––a true indication of excellent engineering and hardware.

The FDM-S2’s frequency coverage is 9 kHz-52 MHz, 74-108 MHz, and 135-160 MHz. I should note here that besides being a great HF and mediumwave performer, the FDM-S2 is an FM DXer’s choice receiver; FM performance on this rig is just superb.

ELAD supports all of their SDRs with their own proprietary application which, of course, is designed to take full advantage of the SDR’s available performance. The ELAD application is feature-packed and even includes built-in DRM decoding. Interestingly, it will allow the FDM-S2 to be used as two completely independent tuners in “double DDC mode”––the working bandwidth of each tuner, in this case, is 384 kHz, and each can be placed within one of the FDM-S2’s input ranges.

In truth, I like pairing my FDM-S2 with the excellent (and free) SDR Console SDR application; I prefer its user interface and recording functionality over the ELAD application.

If you live in an RF-dense area, you might consider one of ELADs external pre-selection filter systems to keep the FDM-S2 from overloading in the presence of very strong signals.

The FDM-S2 is currently priced at $529 US.

Photo of the new ELAD FDM-S3 from the 2018 Hamvention

Note that ELAD will soon be releasing the newest addition to their product line: the FDM-S3. I know very little about the FDM-S3, but I do know ELAD is promising groundbreaking performance and dynamic range, setting a new benchmark for the $1000 price bracket. We do know the FDM-S3’s processing bandwidth is an impressive 24.576 MHz––wide enough to include the entire FM broadcast band!

I’m not sure if FM DXers will be able to take advantage of spectrum recording at a 24 MHz bandwidth, because I suspect it could push 24GB of data per minute. The FDM-S3 may well keep up, but I’m not sure the typical computer hardware can handle that kind of data transfer…it may be likened to, in radio terms, drinking from the proverbial fire hose!

However: ELAD will be sending me a loaner FDM-S3 to review in the coming months, so stay tuned for more on this DXer’s dream rig!

The current FDM-S3 price, by the way, is 949.90 EUR.

WinRadio Excalibur

The WinRadio Excalibur

My first foray into the world of benchmark SDRs was made with the Australian-made WinRadio WR-G31DDC Excalibur. And although this SDR has been on the market for the better part of a decade, it still outperforms many of its competitors.The Excalibur’s frequency range is 9 kHz to 49.995 MHz, providing absolutely stellar performance across the spectrum.

It’s a favorite SDR in my radio shack, despite the fact that it can only be fully controlled by WinRadio’s own proprietary SDR application (at least, I know of no other compatible applications). On the plus side, the WinRadio application is one of my favorites.

The application’s file size is extremely compact––only a 9MB download. The user interface is logical, ergonomic, and responsive. Other than SDR Console, it has some of the best recording functionality available today.

I’ve logged more airtime with the Excalibur than with any other SDR I own, mainly because of its superb overall performance, responsive application, and recording functionality. I use the Excalibur as a benchmark for receiver evaluations and find that very few can match its solid performance.

The WinRadio Excalibur can be purchased through a number of distributors worldwide for about $950.

Enablia TitanSDR Pro

The Enablia Titan SDR Pro is an outlier product in our SDR Primer series, in that it retails in excess of $2,000. However, it’s the highest performing SDR I’ve ever tested. Serious weak-signal DXers will likely be quite pleased with this rig.

And speaking as a radio archivist, the Titan has the most powerful set of audio and spectrum recording features I’ve used, to date. Selectable spectrum recordings can be made from within the wide working bandwidth, and it can run up to four fully-independent SDR receivers, simultaneously.

The Titan comes with 16 frequency preselectors onboard, and a 9 kHz to 32 MHz frequency coverage. Its front end is simply bullet-proof, and thus could be operated in a demanding RF environment.

The TitanSDR ships with a brilliant proprietary application. It’s designed to make managing the Titan’s multiple virtual receivers and four independent SDR receivers as straightforward (and easy!) as possible. As I said in my review, Enablia engineers quite successfully accomplished this. The only downside is that only the TitanSDR application can run only the TitanSDR; no other third-party apps work with it. In addition, when making spectrum recordings, the file format is unique and the header information is actually stored in a separate file. This means when you are transferring a set of spectrum recordings, the header file must also be accounted for.

Of course, there is the daunting price tag of the TitanSDR, which makes it clear that this was a receiver designed for government and commercial use, in particular, for signal intelligence.  Thus it’s likely no surprise that the basic version of the TitanSDR retails for 1380 EUR, the TitanSDR Pro for an even heftier 1970 EUR.

To be fair, there are not many readers who would consider the TitanSDR Pro, but I thought it worth mentioning as it demonstrates a clear case of hardware becoming an innovation’s primary focus.

Enablia’s website is quite basic, so I would recommend you contact them directly to ask for a price quote if you’re interested in one of their TitanSDRs.

Other SDRs

The SDRs above represent merely a small slice of SDR market availability. There are several other notable manufacturers and SDRs worth considering, thus worth noting.

The Bonito Radiojet 1309 Plus

Germany-based Bonito manufactures a number of SDRs, antennas and components that are highly regarded among DXers. Bonito’s “hybrid” SDRs pack a lot of performance yet require very little in terms of computer resources.  Their latest SDR, the Bonito RadioJet 1309 Plus covers 0.02 MHz to 1600 MHz with a spectrum display that can be widened to 3.2 MHz. I have not personally evaluated the RadioJet 1309 Plus, but I did review an early version of the RadioJet (the 1102S) that lacked the additional IQ-receiver of the 1309. I found it an impressively sensitive and selective receiver with excellent audio characteristics. Click here to read that review.

The RFspace Cloud-IQ

RF Space has been manufacturing SDRs longer than many other manufacturers, and the company offers a number of products, including the SDR-IQ, the NetSDR+, the Cloud-IQ, and––soon to come––the CloudSDR.

In Part 2 of our primer, we mentioned the AirSpy HF+ which packs impressive HF performance. Airspy also manufactures the Airspy R2 and Spyverter R2–this $218 US combination produces a compact SDR package with excellent dynamic range and superb frequency stability.

I’m also fond of the classic Microtelecom Perseus SDR, which I’ve seen sold used for approximately $700 US. WinRadio, too, offers higher-end SDRs with a wider frequency range and working bandwidth than the Excalibur––so if your budget allows, you might consider these.

Regardless, keep in mind that if you want to use your monetary resources efficiently, there is no need to splurge for higher-end SDRs unless your use and application demands increased performance. Before you pull the trigger to buy such a rig, I would simply take into consideration the unit’s frequency range, working bandwidth, and performance characteristics, as well as taking the time to read plenty of user reviews. This increases the odds that you’ll get just what you want.

SDR Transceivers

So far, I’ve only mentioned SDR receivers in this primer, but there is a healthy selection of “black box” type SDR transceivers on the market, as well. By “black box,” I mean the transceiver itself (all of the hardware) housed in a box––with, of course, the relevant ports for antennas, data, power, mics, CW keys, and a number of peripherals. These SDRs almost always require a computer for operation, although lately manufacturers are beginning to offer optional touch-screen front panels which can bypass the need for external computer operation.

Unlike the world of tabletop radios, where it might be less expensive to invest in a general coverage transceiver rather than a dedicated receiver, SDR transceivers almost always cost more than an equivalent SDR receiver.

Also note that SDR transceiver applications do not always include audio and spectrum recording functions.  In addition, their working bandwidth might be more narrow that other receive-only SDRs, although they may offer more virtual receivers and spectrum “slices.”

Finally, SDR transceiver applications tend to be proprietary; when you purchase the transceiver, you’re also likely receiving the only SDR application that will interface with it. Hypothetically, if you purchase an SDR transceiver and the company that produced it goes under, you might have issues when the application is no longer updated with operating system upgrades and iterations.  The lesson here is that I believe you should try to stick with the healthiest companies and those with solid, large user bases. This increases the likelihood that the application will be supported in the future.

Low-cost, low power SDRs for the experimenter

We’ll start with the least expensive SDR transceivers designed with the experimenter in mind, that can, with a little adaptation, also be employed by ham radio operators as very low-power transceivers.

The HackRF One ($299) by Great Scott Gadgets is an excellent SDR. It has an incredibly wide frequency range (1 MHz to 6 GHz), and can transmit anywhere from 3 mW to 30 mW depending on the frequency. That’s flea power, true, but if your goal is to experiment in your local surroundings, it’s typically more than enough output. The HackRF is open-source and sports a large user community that have employed it in dozens of applications. The HackRF was one of the first SDRs to really give experimenters a full tool set to manipulate the world of wireless.

Check out the HackRF One via:

The LimeSDR board

The LimeSDR ($299) is another crowd-funded project that has been incredibly popular.  Like the HackRF, it is a low-cost, open-source SDR platform that can be used to support just about any type of wireless communication standard. What makes the LimeSDR unique is that it is integrated with a Snappy Ubuntu Core, which means users can simply install applications from an app store to increase functionality. As LimeSDR states, their platform “gives students, inventors, and developers an intelligent and flexible device for manipulating wireless signals, so they can learn, experiment, and develop with freedom from limited functionality and expensive proprietary devices.

Again, only consider the HackRF of LimeSDR if your main goal is to experiment with the world of wireless. If you’re looking for a full-featured SDR transceiver intended for ham radio, read on.

Ham Radio SDR Transceivers

The Flex Radio booth at the 2018 Hamvention.

Without a doubt, the dominant name in the world of US ham radio transceivers is Texas-based Flex Radio.  Flex has been around since the very earliest days of SDR transceivers and has produced a wide variety of high-performance rigs. In recent years, their product development and production has focused on higher-end transceivers with the discerning DXer and contester in mind. Their signature series SDRs pack incredible performance, yet can be operated from modest PCs since most of the processing horsepower and hardware are all within the radio chassis. Flex has also developed a fully wireless touch-screen Maestro Control Console that can be used over a local network, or even the Internet, to seamlessly control a remotely-connected Flex SDR. Flex Radio SDRs can cost anywhere from $2,000 – $7,500 US.

The Flex-6600

Gary Wise (W4EEY), my go-to guy for all things Flex Radio, also notes:

“One of Flex’s newest models, the Flex-6600, includes 7th Order Contest Band Bandpass Filters and dual Analog to Digital Converters. Which means that, using this radio, one can listen on one band while transmitting on another. Contesters call this ‘Single Operator Two Radio’ operation, and if you can do it successfully, it leads to big contest scores. Having this functionality in one box, without additional controllers and interfaces, is remarkable.”

Indeed.

Two other SDR transceiver manufacturers with large user bases are the Sweden-based SunSDR and India-based Apache Labs. Both companies produce high-performance SDRs and, like Flex, set benchmarks in terms of transceiver performance. I will not comment at length about either company because I’ve not had the opportunity of personally testing their products, but I encourage you to search online reviews about their products.

Tabletop SDR transceivers

The Elad FDM-DUO transceiver is both a stand-alone tabletop and fully-functioning SDR when paired with a PC.

There are a number of full-featured tabletop SDR transceivers on the market. One of the first SDR manufacturers to build a fully self-contained tabletop model with PC integration was ELAD, with their FDM-DUO QRP transceiver. Tabletop SDRs at the time of the FDM-DUO’s release were very limited in their functionality when connected to a PC. Some of them had stripped-down applications and lacked features like spectrum recording and multiple virtual receivers. The FDM-DUO, when connected to a PC running ELAD’s software, gives the user full control of the SDR.  Indeed, the experience is identical to that of using the FDM-S2 mentioned above, however the DUO is also a transceiver. Since the DUO’s release, other SDR manufacturers have designed models with full SDR application integration.

The Flex 6600M is a handsome standalone SDR transceiver.

Recently, Flex Radio introduced their Flex “M” Signature Series SDR Transceiver. These tabletop SDRs can be configured with most of the SDR receivers Flex currently produces. Their displays are impressive and useful; indeed, the spectrum waterfall resolution and size is one of the best I’ve seen on a tabletop transceiver.  The front panel is large and sports a number of controls, the design harkening back to large contest-grade transceivers like the Ten-Tec OMNI VII and Orion series.

The SunSDR MB1 at the 2018 Hamvention.

This year at the Hamvention in Xenia, OH, I had a chance to check out the SunSDR MB1. Like the Flex M series, the MB1 sports a comprehensive front panel and an amazing assortment of connections on the back panel. As I took a tour of this radio––and it really did require a tour, it’s so densely feature-packed––I was most impressed by the thought that went into this stand-alone SDR transceiver. I love the front panel display, graphics, and overall ergonomics. I understand it will also deliver benchmark performance; indeed with prices starting at a steep $7,000 US, I would expect nothing less!

SDR transceiver summary

As we’ve pointed out in this part of our primer, pure SDR transceivers are a product for radio operators willing to invest more financially in order to take advantage of the advanced functionality and performance a true SDR can provide. At present there are surprisingly few players in the pure SDR transceiver market; this is a product category ripe for expansion. And as more manufacturers get into the game, I believe competition will direct prices into even more affordable territory.

Transceivers based upon SDR technology

The final category we’ll discuss is transceivers based upon SDR technology.  It’s a sign of the times, indicating the direction that all enthusiast-grade transceivers and receivers are likely heading.

The Icom IC-7300 transceiver

Because the fact is, whether or not you feel inclined to embrace SDRs in your radio world, you may be surprised that you already have: for many years now, radio manufacturers have built their transceivers and receivers on SDR and I/Q quadrature down-sampling technology. All of the transceivers introduced in the past few years that sport on-board spectrum displays––like the Icom-IC7300, Icom IC-7610, and the new Yaesu FT-DX101D––are, of course, based on SDR technology.

Many others, like the Elecraft KX3 and KX2, which look much more like a traditional radio, are also based on SDR architecture. Indeed, almost all of the major manufacturers implement SDR technology in their current product lines. Manufacturers have caught on, learning how to leverage SDR technology in a way that maximizes receiver performance while keeping the overall price more affordable than comparably-performing legacy radios of former days.

Yet while these radios are SDRs at their core, they often are limited in their functionality when connected to a PC; most can be completely controlled by a PC and many can even export their I/Q data, but usually they won’t offer the working bandwidth and the advanced functionality of a true SDR transceiver.

Conclusion

If I’ve piqued your curiosity about the world of SDRs, and have yet to add one to your shack, I would encourage you to invest in an SDR receiver––at the very least, in one of the affordable rigs mentioned in Part 2 of this series.

Speaking for myself, I was once a “knobs and buttons” radio operator who thought I’d never want to control a radio through a computer and monitor. But when I hesitantly invested in my first SDR, I found it eye-opening––not to mention somewhat democratizing, in that it sets all radio listeners on the same level, as the spectrum becomes visually understandable, and thus accessible, to all who encounter it. I found that if you love to listen, also being able to look at your audio, especially when editing or archiving, but any time you’re tuning around through the spectrum,  just clarifies and enhances your overall radio experience. I soon became hooked…and have never looked back.

Now, I can assure you, I’ll never again be without an SDR. The ability to visualize our radio spectrum via SDR’s virtual window is truly illuminative.  What’s more, I’d even venture to speculate that you may share in finding the experience, if you’ll forgive the colloquialism, pretty darn cool.

Do you enjoy the SWLing Post?

Please consider supporting us via Patreon or our Coffee Fund!

Your support makes articles like this one possible. Thank you!