{"id":12738,"date":"2015-03-22T11:18:57","date_gmt":"2015-03-22T15:18:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/?p=12738"},"modified":"2016-01-15T15:57:08","modified_gmt":"2016-01-15T19:57:08","slug":"gary-debocks-2015-ultralight-radio-shootout-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2015\/03\/gary-debocks-2015-ultralight-radio-shootout-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Gary DeBock’s 2015 Ultralight Radio Shootout Review"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gary DeBock, acclaimed\u00a0innovator in the realm of Ultralight DXing<\/strong>, has recently completed a exhaustive comparison of five popular\u00a0Ultralight radios: the C.Crane CC Pocket<\/strong>, the\u00a0Sangean DT-400W<\/strong>, the\u00a0Eton Traveler III<\/strong>, the\u00a0Tecsun PL-310ET<\/strong>, and the C.Crane CC Skywave<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

In this excellent guest post, you can read Gary’s full 2015 Ultralight Radio Shootout Review<\/em> (the most extensive\u00a0post ever published on the SWLing Post<\/em>). The shootout includes a review of each radio, and compares performance on each radio’s available\u00a0band capability. Of course, an emphasis is placed upon medium wave performance. Gary has also included a number of audio clips comparisons which you can download or listen to within the post.<\/p>\n

Many thanks, Gary, for your in-depth shoot-out!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a02015 Ultralight Radio Shootout Review<\/h1>\n

The Most Advanced Pocket Radios Compete for DXing Supremacy<\/h3>\n

By Gary DeBock, Puyallup, WA, USA
\nMarch 2015<\/p>\n

\"Ultralight-Radios-Review\"<\/a><\/h3>\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/h3>\n

What began as a wildly enthusiastic SRF-59 user group back in late 2007 has managed to sustain worldwide growth for over 7 years, becoming one of the major creative and innovative forces in the AM-DXing community. With foundations laid by the late John Bryant, the Ultralight Radio Yahoo group now boasts over 1,500 members on all continents\u2014united in the challenge of chasing exotic DX with highly advanced pocket radios. Responsible for most of the Ferrite Sleeve Loop antenna experimentation and the spin off sport of ocean cliff transoceanic DXing, the Group\u2019s creative enthusiasm has helped to provide positive momentum for the future of the AM-DXing hobby.<\/p>\n

Fueled by highly innovative DSP chips, today\u2019s Ultralight Radios can run circles around the pocket transistors that many of us grew up with as teenagers in the 60\u2019s and 70\u2019s. Great improvements in both AM band sensitivity and selectivity have made this class one of the most competitive in the industry, and manufacturers have gone all-out to tap this booming market. After Silicon Labs\u2019 innovative Si4734 DSP chips were introduced by the Kchibo and Tecsun companies in 2009 the AM band selectivity of pocket radios was dramatically increased, although such models came with congenital quirks such as internally-generated heterodynes. For about four years DXers wondered when a manufacturer would solve this problem, and introduce a pocket radio with both excellent DSP selectivity and freedom from bogus heterodynes. That wait is now over\u2014such a radio is now an exciting reality.<\/p>\n

One of the unique advantages of Ultralight Radio DXing is the opportunity to sample the latest in innovative technology at a very reasonable cost\u2014and the five pocket radio models chosen for this review include some second generation DSP chip models with astonishing capabilities. Whether your interest is in domestic or split-frequency AM-DXing, FM or Shortwave, the pocket radio manufacturers have designed a breakthrough model for you\u2014and you can try out any (or all) of them at a cost far less than that of a single table receiver. So get ready for some exciting introductions\u2026 and an even more exciting three band DXing competition!<\/p>\n

Section One — Meet The Contestants<\/h2>\n

C.Crane \u201cCC Pocket\u201d<\/h2>\n

\"CCrane-CCPocket\"<\/a>The CC Pocket radio is a vertical form receiver with styling, ergonomics and functions very similar to those of the popular Sangean DT-400W model (the next radio introduced in this Shootout review). Introduced after the DT-400W, the model also includes a few special features which C.Crane obviously hopes will tip the balance for those who are considering which of the two models to choose.<\/p>\n

The radio includes coverage of the AM (520-1710 kHz), FM (76-108 MHz) and 7 Weather Band frequencies (162.400, 162.425, 162.450, 162.475, 162.500, 162.525 and 162.550 MHz). It is powered by two \u201cAA\u201d size batteries, and has a 1.25\u201d speaker capable of 500 mw output. Like most of these vertical form radios the model uses the headphone cable as an FM antenna when the headphones are plugged in, although a plug-in wire antenna is also included to provide FM band reception when the speaker is used. At 2.5\u201d wide x 4.25\u201d high x .9\u201d thick the radio slips easily into almost any pocket, and weighs 3.5 ounces without batteries. A rubber-like trim around the edge of the radio provides a comfortable grip, and a belt clip is attached to the back panel for those who prefer such a mounting system. The radio includes \u201cCC Bud\u201d type earphones, and comes with a one-year warranty. It may be ordered for $64.95 directly from C.Crane<\/a> or from Amazon<\/a>.<\/p>\n

As mentioned previously, the CC Pocket model comes with many added features designed to entice purchasers away from its obvious competition\u2014the Sangean DT-400W model. Some of these features are selectable 1 kHz step tuning, a choice of\u00a0 2.5 kHz or 4 kHz AM selectivity filters, a choice of time or frequency display, an alarm function, far more memory presets (50 versus 19), a more powerful speaker (500 mw versus 70 mw), wider FM band coverage (76-108 MHz versus 87.5-108 MHz), a longer warranty (one year versus 90 days), and the rubber-like trim around the edge of the radio for a more comfortable grip. On paper, the choice between the models sounds like an obvious one\u2014but how do these additional features stack up in the competitive world of AM and FM weak signal reception?<\/p>\n

\"CCPocket-Tool\"<\/a><\/p>\n

CC Pocket\u2014MW-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

The first step in any radio test is to install the batteries, which is normally a routine operation. Not quite so in the CC Pocket\u2026 after trying to slide, pry\u00a0 or coax the battery cover off with my fingers, I finally gave up and grabbed a tool. The CC Pocket\u2019s own instructions say to \u201cRemove the battery cover using your fingernail or small tool.\u201d If you purchase this radio, be prepared to use a tool like a small flat screwdriver whenever you change the two AA batteries.<\/p>\n

When you turn on the radio and search around for fringe daytime DX stations, the lack of a direct entry keypad means that you must use the up or down frequency buttons to tune in stations (as in the DT-400W), which in the case of the CC Pocket goes a little more slowly than in the DT-400W because of the slower tuning rate. Although the CC Pocket has far more audio power through the speaker than the DT-400W, the radio also seems quite a bit more susceptible to indoor RF pollution than the Sangean. For some reason the DT-400W can chase fringe AM-DX stations without any problem adjacent to this computer while I type, while the CC Pocket tends to blank out with computer hash on the same frequencies.<\/p>\n

Taking the radios outside in the back yard I was curious to test the CC Pocket\u2019s narrow filter function, and see how much it would limit splatter from pest stations. Selecting the 1 kHz tuning steps (which the Sangean does not have) I tuned in the local pest 1450-KSUH, which was splattering all the way to 1438 kHz in the 4 kHz filter setting. Switching to the 2.5 kHz filter setting (by pressing memory buttons 1 and 3 simultaneously) I was kind of surprised to find that 1450-KSUH was still splattering all the way to 1438 kHz, even with the narrow filter setting. I did notice that the CC Pocket did provide slightly better reception of weak stations with the 2.5 kHz filter setting, though, so I used it for the CC Pocket\u2019s reception in the MW Sensitivity and MW Selectivity portions of this 2015 Shootout Review.<\/p>\n

My impression is that the radio\u2019s narrow filter is more useful for changing the audio tone than it is for limiting serious pest station splatter, which requires an advanced DSP chip. Despite this, even the wide (4 kHz) setting sounds somewhat harsh in comparison to the mellow-sounding DT-400W audio. Like in the DT-400W (and the new C.Crane Skywave), the lack of a selectable display light for continuous illumination in the dark makes DXing at night somewhat inconvenient, although changing any of the controls (except for the volume) will give you about 12 seconds of temporary display lighting. Finally, the CC Pocket has a strange function to disable the display screen \u201cto improve AM radio reception.\u201d After trying out this \u201cfeature\u201d in multiple situations, I\u2019m convinced that the only thing it really does is to blank out the display screen.<\/p>\n

As for the detailed MW-DXing performance of the CC Pocket against the other four radios in this Shootout review, the MW Sensitivity and MW Selectivity portions of the competition will provide all the information that you desire. In general my \u201ctest drive\u201d of the CC Pocket was pleasant one, although none of the radio\u2019s added features seemed to give it an edge over the DT-400W in the categories that really count\u2014 weak signal MW sensitivity or selectivity.<\/p>\n

Chasing MW fringe stations with either the CC Pocket or the DT-400W will pretty quickly convince you that these vertical form pocket radios do have some limitations\u2014in order to get the loopsticks away from the digital displays the antennas must be located at the bottom of the cabinets, with their length limited to the width of the cabinet. One of the DXing tricks that sometimes will boost weak MW signals on these radios is to invert the cabinets and hold the bottom sides up, getting the loopsticks up in the air (and away from the grip of your hand).<\/p>\n

CC Pocket\u2014FM-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

Never shy about promoting its products, C.Crane proclaims the CC Pocket \u201cis able to bring in a weak FM station better than perhaps any other pocket radio.\u201d That is a pretty dramatic claim, and to be charitable to C.Crane, I assume that whoever wrote this had not yet tried out the Tecsun Si4734 DSP chip models like the PL-310ET (covered later in this Shootout review) with their astonishing FM-DXing capabilities. My home location in the valley of Puyallup, Washington is one of the worst possible for fringe FM reception\u2014with high hills on the north, east and south and a mountain range not very far to the west. C.Crane\u2019s FM-DXing claims for the CC Pocket were about to get the acid test!<\/p>\n

Like the DT-400W the CC Pocket uses the plug-in earphone cable as an FM antenna, although it also includes a plug-in wire antenna for FM reception when the speaker is used. The drawback with this system is that FM reception may be either good, bad or ugly depending upon how the cable is oriented toward the station.<\/p>\n

During my FM test drive with the radio I had two other competing models along for the ride\u2014the DT-400W and the Tecsun PL-310ET. Plugging in the supplied \u201c\u201dCC bud\u201d earphones I starting checking reception of the usual FM fringe stations here in Puyallup, especially the two Victoria (BC) stations on 98.5 and 100.3 MHz. The CC Pocket had average reception of 98.5-CIOC when the earphone cable was ideally oriented, but reception dropped off quickly whenever the cable was moved to another position. By way of reference the DT-400W has the same FM reception issue (with slightly better overall reception of 98.5-CIOC), although the Tecsun PL-310ET was able to seriously outperform both of these vertical form receivers when its whip antenna was fully extended and positioned at an ideal angle. Checking the reception of 100.3-CKKQ confirmed that the previous situation was typical for FM fringe stations, and that neither the CC Pocket nor the DT-400W could really compete with the PL-310ET in the reception of weak FM signals.<\/p>\n

The CC Pocket could sometimes compete with the DT-400W however\u2014with roughly equal reception of weak FM stations. Plugging in the supplied wire antennas and switching to speaker use made no difference. On audio quality, though, the Sangean was a runaway winner. Even without the DBB (deep bass boost) feature its audio quality was superior to that of the CC Pocket, with relatively balanced high and low frequencies. With the DBB feature the Sangean\u2019s FM stereo audio quality was truly in another league compared to the somewhat harsh-sounding CC Pocket. For those DXers who also enjoy listening to FM stereo music on their Ultralight Radios, the choice between these two models is no contest.<\/p>\n

Other Bands<\/h3>\n

Like the DT-400W the CC Pocket has coverage of the 7 Weather Band Frequencies, and a NOAA Weather Alert function selectable for 4, 8 or 16 hour long periods. The CC Pocket\u2019s reception of Weather Band #2 here in Puyallup is similar that of the DT-400W, although not in the same league as that of another C.Crane product\u2014the new CC Skywave (reviewed later).<\/p>\n

Sangean DT-400W<\/h2>\n

\"Sangean-DT400W\"<\/a>This bright yellow pocket radio has been a very popular seller since early 2008, in production continuously because of sensible design, good sensitivity and excellent ergonomics. At the time of its introduction it was the first Ultralight radio to offer superb MW sensitivity across the entire band\u2014something that the competing Eton E100 and Sony SRF-T615 models couldn\u2019t quite seem to manage. The bonus inclusion of a Deep Bass Boost (DBB) function added to the radio\u2019s unique appeal. It was first reviewed in the 2008 Summertime Shootout article (click here to download<\/a>)\u00a0where its MW sensitivity was then judged to be at the top of the Ultralight Radio class.<\/p>\n

Although dramatic improvements in DSP chips have enabled newer pocket radios to surpass it in this aspect the appeal of the vertical form receiver remains high, and other manufacturers (like C.Crane, with its CC Pocket) have done their best to introduce similar competing models.<\/p>\n

The DT-400W includes coverage of the AM (520-1710 kHz), FM (87.5-108 MHz) and 7 Weather Band frequencies. It is powered by two AA batteries, and has a 1 3\/8\u201d speaker capable of 70 mw output. The size of the radio is almost exactly the same as the CC Pocket\u2014 2.5\u201d wide x 4.2\u201d high x\u00a0 1.2\u201d thick, and it weighs 3.8 ounces without batteries. The radio comes with earphones, an FM wire antenna, a belt clip and a 90 day warranty. Like the CC Pocket the DT-400W uses the earphone cable as a plug-in FM antenna, but the supplied wire antenna may be plugged in to provide FM reception whenever the speaker is used. The radio may be purchased from Sears for $57.67 by clicking this\u00a0link<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Sangean-DT400W-Batteries\"<\/a><\/p>\n

DT-400W\u2014MW-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

Unlike the CC Pocket installation of the two AA batteries (with fingers) is a breeze in the Sangean, and the battery cover even has a hinge system to keep it attached to the radio (see photo above).<\/p>\n

As with the CC Pocket, all tuning must be done with the up or down frequency buttons, but this process goes a little more quickly in the Sangean because of a faster tuning rate. Ergonomically the radio is well designed, and although it lacks the CC Pocket\u2019s rubber side trim the radio feels very comfortable to hold and operate. Even without the DBB (deep bass boost) engaged the DT-400W has very mellow audio, and although the audio amp and speaker are not especially powerful the high audio quality makes DXing with the radio a very enjoyable activity.<\/p>\n

The DT-400W was at the top of the Ultralight Radio class in MW sensitivity when it was first introduced in early 2008, and it still has very respectable weak signal reception all across the band in consideration of its vertical form and relatively short loopstick (similar to that of the CC Pocket, but with higher audio quality). The DT-400W lacks the dual selectivity filters and 1 kHz step tuning option of the C.Crane model but definitely holds its own in both MW sensitivity and selectivity\u2014even when the CC Pocket is set in the 2.5 kHz selectivity option.<\/p>\n

The CC Pocket has a much more powerful audio amp and speaker than this model, but the DT-400W\u2019s higher audio quality provides somewhat of a tradeoff in the enjoyment of\u00a0 tracking down weak signals. In the indescribable \u201cfun factor\u201d the bright yellow Sangean seems to have a charm all its own\u2014with popular features and styling that have kept it in steady demand for almost 7 years.<\/p>\n

DT-400W\u2014FM-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

Using the Sangean for FM reception will pretty quickly demonstrate to you why this radio has been so popular since its introduction in 2008\u2014when augmented by its DBB (deep bass boost) function, the radio\u2019s stereo audio quality is superb\u2014and as good as it gets in the Ultralight class. Although the enjoyment of stereo FM music may not be the highest priority for FM-DXers, it is a very unusual bonus in pocket radios this size.<\/p>\n

As detailed in the previous comments about the CC Pocket, the DT-400W\u2019s FM sensitivity and selectivity are roughly comparable to that of the C.Crane model, both with the plug-in earphones and with the supplied plug-in wire antenna (during speaker usage). And as with the CC Pocket, the FM reception on the DT-400W using these plug-in wire antennas will vary from fairly good to nonexistent, depending upon how well the wires are oriented toward the broadcasting station. This type of FM wire antenna is cheap and convenient, but DXers shouldn\u2019t expect to chase serious E-Skip or Tropo with such a humble setup.<\/p>\n

As during the CC Pocket\u2019s FM test drive a new Tecsun PL-310ET was along for the ride, and when its whip antenna was fully extended and ideally oriented it had no trouble demonstrating a serious FM sensitivity edge oven the Sangean\u2014regardless of which FM fringe station was the target. When a local FM stereo station was received at good strength on both radios, however, the DT-400W turned the tables somewhat by trouncing the PL-310ET in the audio quality of its stereo music reception. Overall the Sangean model is a lot of fun to use on FM, even if its FM sensitivity isn\u2019t quite at the top of the Shootout class.<\/p>\n

Other Bands<\/h3>\n

The DT-400W\u2019s Weather Band reception and Alert function is identical to that of the CC Pocket, right down to the selectable 4, 8 or 16 hour Alert periods (somebody at C.Crane must have had a sense of humor, in order to copy this function of the DT-400W so closely). The reception of the Weather Bands and Alerts is through the plug-in wire antenna, which must be oriented properly for good reception. And as with the CC Pocket the DT-400W is only capable of receiving Weather Band #2 here in Puyallup, at a signal level identical to its competing model. C.Crane\u2019s new Skywave model (reviewed later in this Shootout) provides Weather Band reception far superior to either of these models, however.<\/p>\n

\"Tecsun-PL310ET\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Tecsun PL-310ET<\/h3>\n

At the time of its introduction in September of 2009 the Tecsun PL-310 model was an immediate DXing sensation\u2014providing not only Ultralight Class-leading MW, FM and SW sensitivity but also breakthrough MW selectivity as well. The new PL-310ET model includes coverage of the AM (520-1710 kHz), LW (153-513 kHz), FM (64-108 MHz) and SW (2.3-21.95 MHz) bands, with multiple digital search functions, 550 memories, multiple display options and many other features. The radio typically comes with a carrying case, owner\u2019s manual, earphones, 3 rechargeable AA batteries and a USB cable. It is available from multiple Chinese and Hong Kong eBay sellers<\/a>, as well as from Amazon for $49.89 (plus free shipping)<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Back in late 2008, the innovative Si4734 DSP chip in the PL-310 (and in the related PL-380, PL-606 and PL-505 models) provided a new level of DSP filtering, S\/N and RSSI displays and many other advanced features\u2014bringing a basic level of transoceanic DXing capability to the Ultralight Class. Although the PL-310 came with several DSP chip-related quirks like internally generated MW heterodynes, relatively muffled 1 kHz DSP audio and a dubious \u201csoft mute\u201d function to mute weak signals whenever they fell below a certain threshold, DXers were generally willing to tolerate these irritating quirks in order to experience the best MW, FM and SW sensitivity and selectivity that the pocket radio class had to offer. My own 4-Band performance review of the PL-310 at the time (click here to download<\/a>) was typical of the original glowing praise for the breakthrough model, and like other DXers, I was hopeful that Tecsun and\/or Silicon Labs would correct the irritating Si4734 DSP chip quirks in order to make the PL-310 model a true pocket radio DXing legend.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, though, it seems like Tecsun had other priorities for this model. Geared toward the huge Chinese market (with very little DXing tradition or interest), the PL-310 and its related models have already been a big success for Tecsun in the aspect that seems to matter most to them\u2014profit. Instead of working with SiLabs to improve the DSP chip design and address the quirks in the PL-310 and related models, Tecsun seems to have gone in the opposite direction by cutting manufacturing corners in order to increase profits.<\/p>\n

This has left DXers with even more digital quirks in the newer PL-310 and PL-380 models\u2014and opened up a major new market in Ultralight radios designed to correct these original PL-310 type quirks (like the new C.Crane Skywave and the Eton Traveler III). The new PL-310ET model has all the quirks of the original PL-310 plus a few more\u2026 but it also still has very competitive performance (for the price) on FM and SW\u2014and also for MW-DXers who don\u2019t mind dodging the heterodynes, living with \u201csoft mute\u201d and tolerating muffled 1 kHz DSP audio.<\/p>\n

PL-310ET\u2014MW-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

While DXing with the PL-310ET on MW you basically have a choice between high sensitivity and relatively muffled audio (1 kHz DSP filtering) or lower sensitivity and higher audio quality (2, 3, 4 or 6 kHz DSP filtering). Unfortunately, you cannot have both. With the PL-310ET you can either enter a frequency into the keypad, turn the rotary tuning knob (with the tuning rate switching between 1 KHz and 10 kHz steps depending upon you speed of rotation) or use one of the multiple digital search modes (Easy Tuning Mode, Auto Tuning Storage, Auto Browse, Direct Key in Memory Address, etc.). There are 100 memories available for MW stations (as well as 100 for both FM and LW, and 250 for SW stations). No other Ultralight radio has such advanced tuning capabilities, except for recent similar Tecsun models.<\/p>\n

\"Tecsun-PL-310ET-compared-PL-310-original\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, though, the PL-310ET has all of the digital quirks of the original PL-310 on MW, plus a few more. As shown in the photo at right, the model is a complete redesign of the 2009 model, and Tecsun\u2019s cost-cutting shows up in new MW-related issues. The Si4734 chip-generated tuning heterodynes are still on frequencies like 1420, 1430 and 1440, and there is a new issue of digital hash noise whenever you press one of the front panel buttons (like the frequency numerals). When you grasp the original PL-310 with your palm on the display and your fingers tightly gripping the top of the cabinet you will only have an increase in background static\u2014but if you try this with the new PL-310ET you will get a low-level digital whine. The 1 kHz DSP DX station audio in the PL-310 models (both old and new) sounds somewhat muffled, with the higher audio frequencies clipped off by the Si4734 DSP chip. This has been a long-term issue with transoceanic DXers, who frequently record DX station MP3\u2019s during DXpeditions.<\/p>\n

Side by side comparisons of the PL-310ET and two new competing models (the C.Crane Skywave and Eton Traveler III) provide convincing proof that all of these issues can be either corrected or improved\u2014with both new models correcting the PL-310\u2019s internally generated heterodyne issue, and the C.Crane Skywave providing improved DX station audio in the 1 kHz DSP setting (when the default \u201cMusic\u201d tone setting is used). As such, MW DXers in need of 1 kHz DSP selectivity no longer need to tolerate the Tecsun\u2019s bogus heterodynes, muffled audio and digital whine quirks any longer. For transoceanic DXers especially, this is a major breakthrough.<\/p>\n

Domestic DXers will quickly discover that the PL-310 does have some good points, with selectable displays of RSSI, S\/N, temperature (Fahrenheit or Centigrade), time, an alarm function, a selectable light for the display and many other features. The basic question for interested MW-DXers is whether or not they can tolerate the PL-310ET\u2019s internally generated heterodynes, relatively muffled 1 kHz DSP audio, soft mute and moderate digital whine issues. If not, they should direct their attention to one of the new competing models\u2014the C.Crane Skywave (optimized for transoceanic DXers), or the Eton Traveler III (optimized for domestic DXers). How these three models shake out in weak signal MW-DXing will be fully revealed in the Shootout portion of this review.<\/p>\n

PL-310ET\u2014FM-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

Although the MW performance of the PL-310ET is no longer top of the line, the good news is that the FM performance of the PL-310ET is as good as ever. The Si4734 DSP chip has earned a very impressive reputation in FM sensitivity and selectivity since it was introduced in 2009, and the PL-310ET continues to dominate the Ultralight radio field in this capability (along with its brother PL-606 model, which has the extended whip antenna). The new models which compete so successfully with the PL-310 in MW-DXing fall flat in FM competition, limited either by their shorter whip antennas, less sensitive DSP chips or both.<\/p>\n

On any fringe FM test station the PL-310ET easily demonstrates its superiority in FM sensitivity\u2014so long as its whip antenna is ideally directed at the fringe station. This does take a little bit of experimentation, but once the PL-310ET\u2019s whip antenna is oriented properly it can almost always humble any of the other competing Shootout models in weak signal FM reception.\u00a0 The radio\u2019s FM stereo audio quality is acceptable, but for true music lovers it will not come close to the superb audio fidelity of the Deep Bass Boost-enhanced Sangean DT-400W.<\/p>\n

PL-310ET\u2014SW-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

Once again, the Tecsun model demonstrates that it still has a lot to offer. None of the competing models can match the PL-310ET in Shortwave sensitivity, where the radio has a weak signal reception edge all its own. The competing models seem limited (once again) by shorter whip antennas, less sensitive DSP chips or both. One gets the distinct impression that C.Crane and Eton included Shortwave coverage in the Skywave and Traveler III models primarily because it is expected by purchasers, but neither manufacturer seems to have made a serious effort to improve upon the excellent Shortwave performance of the Si4734 DSP chip in the PL-310 and related models. Their competitive effort seems to have been concentrated (successfully) in Medium Wave performance\u2014leaving the PL-310ET the champion of Ultralight Shortwave reception. The 250 Shortwave memories and multiple digital search functions only add to the radio\u2019s appeal in this popular capability.<\/p>\n

Other Bands<\/h3>\n

The PL-310ET does not have Weather or Air Band coverage, but it does offer Longwave coverage from 153-513 kHz. The radio is a real clunker in Longwave reception, however, with a loopstick obviously designed for the MW frequencies. Nobody should purchase this radio (or the new Eton Traveler III) with hopes of receiving serious Longwave DX. As an example, the radio cannot even receive a trace of my local NDB pests on 216 and 328 kHz at any time of the day or night. There is an effective Longwave loopstick designed especially for the Tecsun DSP Ultralight radio models, however (with details posted here–click to download<\/a>) that will transform any of the Tecsun Longwave models into serious DXing performers.<\/p>\n

\"CC-Skywave\"<\/a><\/p>\n

C.Crane Skywave<\/h3>\n

Although Tecsun has shown no interest in correcting the MW-DXing digital quirks in the PL-310, PL-380 and related models, the excellent news is that another major manufacturer has definitely been paying attention to DXers\u2019 wishes\u2014creating a new model that succeeds in correcting them all. The C.Crane Skywave almost seems custom-designed for serious MW-DXers\u2014solving the internally-generated heterodynes and soft mute issues of the PL-310, and improving upon the muffled 1 kHz DSP audio problem as well. \u00a0It also offers wide-band FM coverage, outstanding Weather Band sensitivity and bonus Air Band coverage\u2014at a price. The new Skywave model appears to be a custom project of C.Crane, and the $89.95 price (before shipping) probably reflects the company\u2019s high research and development costs in creating such an innovative model.<\/p>\n

The C.Crane Skywave\u2019s appearance might seem similar to that of the Digitech AR-1733, but interested purchasers should not be misled by this fact. The Skywave is a total redesign of that earlier model\u2014which C.Crane apparently used as a starting point for their custom Skywave project. It has custom circuit boards (designed by C.Crane, and assembled by its Redsun partner, in China), two DSP chips, strong build quality and weather-resistant construction. The model includes coverage of the AM (520-1710 kHz), FM (76-108 MHz), SW (2.3-26.1 MHz), AIR (118-137 MHz) and 7 Weather Band frequencies (with a Weather Alert function, selectable for 4, 8 or 16 hours). The radio comes with an owner\u2019s manual, carrying case, warranty card (one year) and CC Bud earphones. The C.Crane Skywave model is available for $89.95 plus shipping from either from Amazon<\/a> \u00a0or directly from C.Crane<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Although the Skywave includes several digital improvements over the PL-310 and other Tecsun DSP radios C.Crane makes no attempt to match the multiple digital search functions and display options offered by the PL-310 and related units\u2014and the user will quickly discover that simplicity and basic function is the order of the day. There is only one digital search mode (ATS), no selectable display light (although pressing one of the controls will get you about 12 seconds of temporary lighting), no volume level display, only 100 memories (which the owner\u2019s manual does not tell you) and a very basic bar graph display of signal strength.<\/p>\n

Of course, none of these limitations will matter very much to MW-DXers (especially split-frequency DX enthusiasts) who have waited many years for a manufacturer to correct the digital quirks degrading the Tecsun DSP Ultralight models. The Skywave and the competing Eton Traveler III model (reviewed next) set new MW-DXing standards for those hobbyists who want class-leading sensitivity, no \u201csoft mute\u201d signal dropouts and complete freedom from bogus heterodynes.<\/p>\n

\"CC-Skywave-RF-Board\"<\/a><\/p>\n

C.Crane Skywave\u2014MW-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

C.Crane\u2019s target group for this new model includes transoceanic and domestic MW-DXers who love the Tecsun PL-310\u2019s (and PL-380\u2019s) breakthrough DSP selectivity but hate the model\u2019s digital quirks\u2014and if you fall into this category, then you are in for a real treat! The Skywave\u2019s excellent MW sensitivity is augmented by its complete freedom from bogus heterodynes and \u201csoft mute,\u201d and it provides 1 kHz DSP selectivity every bit as effective as the Tecsun radios\u2014with improved audio clarity as well.<\/p>\n

Chasing the same MW fringe stations with the Skywave and PL-310ET model side by side immediately reveals a significant gap in overall performance\u2026wide enough to convince most MW-DXers that the PL-310ET has become second rate. When both models are set in the 1 kHz DSP setting (which also provides maximum MW sensitivity on both models) the PL-310ET seems bogged down by its muffled audio, mystery heterodynes and bizarre tendency to silence a fringe station when it becomes too weak (which is a particularly irritating quirk for dedicated DXers). The Skywave excels in correcting all these issues, but as mentioned before, the emphasis is on simplicity\u2014and the model lacks several of the PL-310ET\u2019s display functions (RSSI, S\/N, temperature in F or C, volume level and a selectable display light), digital search functions and memory capacity.<\/p>\n

The Skywave\u2019s audio amplifier is also slightly underpowered in comparison to the competing models, and does tend to max out on weak stations more readily than that of the PL-310ET or the Eton Traveler III. In combination with the Skywave\u2019s lack of any volume level display, this can mean quite a few trips to the upper stops of the analog volume control.<\/p>\n

Finally, it does need to be emphasized that C.Crane\u2019s Skywave is not the only new Ultralight radio designed to correct the Tecsun models\u2019 DSP chip quirks\u2014the new Eton Traveler III also corrects them, and does so quite effectively at a price lower than that of the Skywave. For MW-DXers interested in both of these new models, the deciding factor will probably be whether 1 kHz DSP selectivity is a high priority. The Skywave provides it very effectively, while the Traveler III lacks any selectivity choices. In summary, though, for Medium Wave transoceanic DXers eager to push their Ultralight DXing luck for all it is worth, the new CC Skywave is the radio that we have been waiting for\u2014despite its weak points.<\/p>\n

C.Crane Skywave\u2014FM-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

Although C.Crane\u2019s refinements really provide a DXing edge for the Skywave over the PL-310ET on Medium Wave, it seems that superior FM performance was not part of C.Crane\u2019s research and development program. The FM sensitivity and selectivity of the Skywave fall somewhat short of the PL-310ET\u2019s standard, leaving the model with average performance in fringe station reception. As with the PL-310ET it is necessary to orient the whip antenna in the optimal direction for best reception, but even with the utmost effort in doing so the model\u2019s weak signal reception never quite matches that of the Si4734 DSP chip in the PL-310ET.<\/p>\n

The Tecsun\u2019s 100 FM memories matches the entire total for the Skywave model, and the PL-310ET\u2019s multiple display functions make the Skywave look pretty rudimentary. The PL-310ET offers wideband (64-108 MHz) FM coverage, while the Skywave offers only the domestic North American frequencies (87.5-108 MHz). The PL-310ET\u2019s superior audio amp also makes a difference when signals get really weak, and its digital search modes are superior. Since the MW band advantages detailed above are irrelevant on FM frequencies, the model really falls short of the PL-310ET\u2019s standard in FM-DXing performance. It does compete quite effectively with the other contestants in this competition, however.<\/p>\n

C.Crane Skywave\u2014SW-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

In competition with the PL-310ET the Skywave\u2019s Shortwave sensitivity also falls short of the mark, although the C.Crane model does have some minor advantages on these bands. It offers wider frequency coverage (2.3-26.1 MHz, compared to 2.3-21.95 MHz for the PL-310ET), and its 1 kHz DSP audio sounds superior to the somewhat muffled 1 kHz DSP audio in the PL-310ET. With the sad situation of fewer and fewer Shortwave stations continuing to broadcast, however, the need for superior selectivity on the Shortwave bands isn\u2019t so important anymore. Because fewer stations are broadcasting the PL-310ET can almost always be set in the 2 kHz DSP setting for improved DX station audio without facing the drawback of side channel interference.<\/p>\n

The Skywave\u2019s Shortwave sensitivity allows it to receive most of the same stations but at less signal strength than that of the PL-310ET. Similar to the situation on the FM band, the PL-310ET has far more display options, memories (250 on Shortwave alone, versus 100 total in the Skywave) and digital search modes\u2014as well as a more powerful audio amplifier. Dedicated Shortwave DXers will probably find the Skywave to be a little too basic to meet their needs, despite the wider coverage on the higher frequencies. Once again, though, the Skywave\u2019s Shortwave performance is in the same ballpark as that of the new Eton Traveler III\u2014the next model up for review in this article. Either one of these new models should have acceptable Shortwave sensitivity for the reception of typically strong SW station parallels of MW mystery stations.<\/p>\n

\"CC-Skywave-DSP\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Other Bands<\/h3>\n

The CC Skywave really excels on two other bands– one of which is unique in the Ultralight radio class. Its Weather Band sensitivity is far superior to that of the CC Pocket and DT-400W models, and it has the same Weather Alert function and selectable time periods (4, 8 or 16 hours) as those vertical-form models. Weather Band reception which is dicey on the smaller models is usually crystal clear on the Skywave\u2014most likely because of the dedicated DSP chip for Weather and Air Band reception in the model.<\/p>\n

If any reader places an extremely high priority on the stable reception of Weather Band alerts during emergencies, this is definitely the Ultralight radio of choice. Not only is the whip antenna far superior to the makeshift wire antenna system of the vertical-form models, but the DSP chip-provided sensitivity is in an entirely different league.<\/p>\n

Finally, one of the obvious attractions of the CC Skywave model is its AIR Band coverage from 118-137 MHz\u2014unique in the Ultralight radio class. According to information from C.Crane., the Si4736 DSP chip on the digital board is used strictly for Weather and AIR Band reception\u2014and it definitely provides excellent sensitivity on both of those bands.<\/p>\n

To get started in listening to communication between airports and airplanes the owner\u2019s manual instructs the user to check the internet for airport frequency listings, specifically mentioning the http:\/\/www.flightradio.com<\/a> site. After checking that site (and paying a $10 fee for \u201clifetime membership\u201d) I was able to download a file with airport communication frequencies for the entire USA, which is posted here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

My home town of Puyallup, WA is along the direct southerly approach route for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport\u2014a pretty busy site with lots of air traffic. The frequency listings mentioned a SeaTac tower frequency of 119.900 MHz, which is used by the tower to receive communication from airplanes approaching the airport and requesting a runway assignment. Depending upon air traffic, the time of day and luck, the CC Skywave can receive either a lot, a little or almost no communication on this tower frequency. Since only communication from airplanes is heard, the signal strengths can vary from a thunderous level (for planes directly overhead) down to a ghostly wisp (for airplanes many miles away).<\/p>\n

Below, you’ll find a sample MP3 of the Skywave\u2019s reception on this 119.900 MHz SeaTac tower frequency (with communication from three airplanes within two minutes). Click here to simply download this MP3<\/a>.<\/p>\nhttp:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/119.9-SeaTacTower-030815CCSW.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

The CC Skywave has a Squelch function which will mute the background noise on the AIR band frequencies while you await voice traffic\u2014which is engaged by pushing in the tuning control for two seconds, then rotating the control to choose your desired threshold level. This is a nice feature for those who only wish to hear the voice communication, but it does reduce the radio\u2019s reception sensitivity somewhat. In general the Skywave\u2019s AIR Band coverage is a major plus for those interested in airport communication, although these types of transmissions are almost always brief, businesslike, and to the point. Listeners should not expect any of the emotion and drama typical in airport disaster movies!<\/p>\n

\"Eton-Traveler-III-Front\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Eton\u00a0Traveler III<\/h3>\n

Another innovative model providing breakthrough MW-DXing performance is the new Traveler III\u2014which in stock form is quite possibly the most capable domestic DXing pocket radio on the planet. Although Eton has also managed to correct the most troublesome digital quirks of the PL-310 and related Tecsun DSP models on Medium Wave (bogus heterodynes and soft mute), unlike the CC Skywave the Traveler III makes no attempt to offer improved DSP selectivity. Instead it takes innovation in a different direction\u2014by concentrating on the best possible MW sensitivity, and by its breakthrough inclusion of an RDS display on the FM Band (an Ultralight radio first).<\/p>\n

With only a single selectivity choice on the MW band (which is roughly equivalent to the CC Skywave\u2019s 2 kHz DSP setting in filtering performance) the Traveler III is unlikely to attract much interest from split-frequency transoceanic DXers. But its breakthrough MW sensitivity makes it a very formidable contender for the attention of all other Medium Wave DXers\u2014especially those who appreciate its unique, stylish appearance.<\/p>\n

There is only one digital search choice (ATS), and like the CC Skywave, the manual doesn\u2019t tell you how many memories the radio provides (apparently 100, like the Skywave). But it does include a selectable display light\u2014with a duration of up to 10 minutes.<\/p>\n

The Traveler III includes coverage of the AM (520-1710 kHz), LW (153-513 kHz), FM (87-108 MHz) and SW (2.3-26.1 MHz) Bands. Provided with the radio is an owner\u2019s manual (in five different languages) and carrying case. There are no earphones or warranty card provided, although when you check at the manufacturer\u2019s web site you are informed that the Traveler III\u2019s warranty is for one year.<\/p>\n

The radio may be purchased for $59.99 (with free shipping) from Amazon by clicking this link<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In general, the Traveler III has an appearance and function quite unique among recently introduced pocket radios, with an attractive aluminum-colored trim around the cabinet edge, and a whip antenna mounting post extending horizontally from the back cabinet. It has a front panel world time selector switch hidden behind a hinged door (opening downwards), and a unique display with orange characters on a dark gray background. The model is the only Ultralight radio to use four AA batteries\u2014surely giving it unparalleled DXing endurance.<\/p>\n

Perhaps the most unusual point is the lack of any selectivity choice\u2014putting the radio at a competitive disadvantage with the Tecsun 1 kHz DSP ultralights and the new CC Skywave in this aspect. However the Traveler III does have quite a lot going for it, especially for domestic MW-DXers who don\u2019t need to chase split-frequency DX targets. Both the MW sensitivity and tone quality are first rate\u2014and the stylish appearance and reasonable price should attract quite a dedicated audience. Its new Si4735 DSP chip also provides FM-DXers with an Ultralight radio class breakthrough\u2014an RDS display with multiple data choices.<\/p>\n

\"Eton-Traveler-III-RFboard\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Eton\u00a0Traveler III\u2014MW-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

The Traveler III\u2019s target group includes those MW-DXers who place a high priority on both excellent sensitivity and audio quality. The radio provides an outstanding combination of both\u2014 and although there are a few digital quirks that need to be tolerated, in general the Traveler III makes it a real pleasure to track down weak MW signals.<\/p>\n

First we will cover the quirks. Since there is no direct entry keypad you will need to rotate the tuning knob to choose your frequencies. The knob is capable of covering wide ranges quickly if you rotate it with some speed, and it is also capable of accurately tuning in 9 or 10 kHz steps if you rotate it slowly. The volume control has a digital display level, but each time you adjust the volume control you will get a short burst of soft digital hash noise whenever the volume level changes a step (i.e., don\u2019t try to change the volume level during recordings).<\/p>\n

Finally, changing the frequency will cause the audio to drop out for about one second, then come back in a rush. If you can tolerate these digital quirks, though, you will discover that the radio has a great deal to offer the MW-DXer. Sensitivity is exceptional (the specifications list it as less than or equal to 1mv\/m), and although there is no choice of audio tone, the radio\u2019s tone is almost high fidelity as delivered from the factory. Like the PL-310ET the radio has both a pretty powerful audio amp and a volume level display, and in combination with the excellent audio fidelity this feature really helps to dig out the weak stations (although advancing the volume knob up to the maximum will give you those soft digital hash sounds, as mentioned previously).<\/p>\n

The Traveler III also has exceptional nulling ability for a stock pocket radio\u2014and is the first one ever tested here which is able to null out the semi-local pests on 570 and 710 kHz to pull in weak stations on the same frequency.<\/p>\n

So how much does the single selectivity choice limit the Traveler III\u2019s ability to go after weak MW stations next to strong locals? For domestic DXers (and for transoceanic DXers lucky enough to live on an isolated ocean beach in Carbonear, Newfoundland) probably not so much. As mentioned before, the single selectivity choice provides filtering roughly equivalent to the 2 KHz DSP setting in the CC Skywave, which in combination with the radio\u2019s exceptional nulling ability provides a decent chance to go after almost any domestic station (please refer to the MW Selectivity Shootout MP3\u2019s for further details).<\/p>\n

For most of the transoceanic DXers who routinely push their luck chasing 9 kHz-split targets adjacent to troublesome domestic pests, however, the Traveler III\u2019s single selectivity choice will probably be unacceptable. In most parts of North America (and Europe, for that matter) there is simply too much domestic splatter across the band to have much success in chasing weak transoceanic DX without effective 1 kHz DSP filtering\u2014such as is provided by the new CC Skywave or the Tecsun PL-310ET (and PL-380). Even with this 1 kHz filtering, traces of domestic splatter still show up on most of the transoceanic DX MP3\u2019s recorded here at this western Washington location. In the very rough mission of pocket radio transoceanic DXing, you need every possible advantage\u2014including the best possible 1 kHz DSP filtering. Continually trying to chase split-frequency DX without it will probably bring you a serious case of grief.<\/p>\n

\"Eton-Traveler-III-Antenna\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Eton Traveler\u00a0III\u2014FM-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

First, the good news. As mentioned previously, the Traveler III is the first Ultralight radio to feature an RDS display on FM, provided by its Si4735 DSP chip. When an FM station is transmitting RDS data and is of sufficient strength, the radio is capable of providing a display of either \u201cPS\u201d (program name), \u201cPTY\u201d(program type), \u201cRT\u201d (program text) or \u201cDATA\u201d (time, date, weekly program and call sign). A quick press of the \u201cRDS\u201d button allows you to toggle between these displays\u2014assuming that the FM station is transmitting all the data. In practice, many FM stations either do not transmit all of this data, or may not transmit any RDS data at all. You need to wait for a small \u201cRDS\u201d icon to show up on the display prior to using the system. In any case, solid FM reception is required for the Traveler III to display any RDS data\u2014a factor which limits the system further.<\/p>\n

Unlike on the MW band, changing the radio\u2019s volume control on the FM band does not result in short bursts of digital hash between the volume level steps. The radio\u2019s FM audio quality sounds fairly average through the speaker, with the emphasis on treble response. The whip antenna\u2019s mounting post extends horizontally from the back cabinet, and has an unusual double-hinge system which may either be convenient or tricky, depending upon your personal preference (see photo above). My own impression is that this type of antenna may not survive a careless owner.<\/p>\n

Finally, at only 16\u201d the whip antenna is unusually short, in comparison to the 19\u201d of the CC Skywave and the 21.5\u201d of the PL-310ET. Along with DSP chip differences this translates into weaker FM sensitivity than that of the PL-310ET, although the Traveler III is pretty competitive with the other review models in this aspect. If a dedicated FM-DXer augmented the radio with an effective external antenna the Traveler III\u2019s RDS system might become a major plus, but in stock form the radio\u2019s limited FM sensitivity makes this new feature seem rather compromised.<\/p>\n

Eton Traveler III\u2014SW-DXing Test Drive<\/h3>\n

Like the CC Skywave (and unlike the PL-310ET) the Traveler III provides Shortwave coverage all the way up to 26.1 MHz \u2013 although like the Skywave, breakthrough Shortwave sensitivity doesn\u2019t seem to be part of the radio\u2019s master plan. With the shorter whip antenna and single selectivity choice the Traveler III\u2019s Shortwave performance ends up below that of the PL-310ET, but it can compete with the CC Skywave and most other Ultralight radios fairly well on the SW bands.<\/p>\n

Changing the volume control steps does not generate the short bursts of digital hash like it does on the MW frequencies, and the audio amplifier is powerful enough to check out most of the weak SW stations. Like on the FM band, the short (16\u201d) whip antenna is hardly optimum for good Shortwave sensitivity, and any serious SW-DXer would wish to either upgrade the antenna or opt for a different model to begin with (like the PL-310ET, or one of its 1 kHz DSP siblings like the PL-380, PL-505 or PL-606). In general the Traveler III provides acceptable Shortwave sensitivity for checking powerful parallel stations of mystery MW-DX signals, but Shortwave performance is not this model\u2019s strong point.<\/p>\n

Other Bands<\/h3>\n

The Traveler III has no Weather Band reception, but it does include Longwave Band coverage from 153-513 kHz. Unfortunately (like the PL-310ET), the loopstick is optimized for the Medium Wave frequencies\u2014resulting in deaf sensitivity across the entire Longwave spectrum. Neither the Traveler III nor the PL-310ET can receive a trace of my local NDB pests on 216 or 328 kHz (or any other Longwave stations)\u2014even around local midnight. Unless you have the technical ability to replace the loopstick or connect an effective Longwave external antenna to the model, you should consider this Longwave \u201ccoverage\u201d to be completely useless.<\/p>\n

Section Two\u2014The Shootout<\/h2>\n

\"Ultralight-Shootout-Contenders\"<\/p>\n

For the first time in any competitive radio review, multiple test signal MP3\u2019s were recorded to give each reader a chance to listen to accurate evidence of the relative performance of each model in important categories. These categories were MW sensitivity, MW selectivity, FM sensitivity, Shortwave sensitivity and Weather Band sensitivity.<\/p>\n

MW Sensitivity Shootout<\/strong><\/h3>\n

For the MW Sensitivity test MP3\u2019s weak daytime DX fringe stations were chosen and recorded during hours close to local noon, emphasizing stable ground wave propagation. The daytime DX stations were chosen because of the challenging nature of their signals, which cannot be received on pocket radios without above average sensitivity. Each radio had an equal chance to demonstrate its sensitivity, with all the test signals being recorded within a 5 minute period (during which a stable test signal was ensured), and all loopsticks were oriented in the same direction.<\/p>\n

Finally, the radios were switched around to ensure that no position was inferior or superior to any other position. The CC Pocket was placed in its narrow (2.5 kHz) filter setting and the Tecsun PL-310ET and C.Crane Skywave models were placed in their 1 kHz DSP settings (all of which were found to provide the best sensitivity and selectivity for the three models). The Skywave was set in its default \u201cMusic\u201d tone selection.<\/p>\n

In all the Medium Wave test signal reception MP3\u2019s, the CC Pocket is recorded for the first 15 seconds, followed by the Sangean DT-400W for approximately 15 seconds, followed by the Tecsun PL-310ET for approximately 15 seconds, followed by the C.Crane Skywave for approximately 15 seconds, followed by the Eton Traveler III for 15 seconds.<\/p>\n

[Click on recording description to download]<\/p>\n

620\u00a0 KPOJ\u00a0\u00a0 Portland, Oregon\u00a0 (25 kW at 116 miles)<\/a><\/p>\nhttp:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/620-KPOJ-CCPvsDT400WvsPL310vsCCSWvsTravIII.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

650\u00a0 CISL\u00a0 Vancouver, BC\u00a0 (10 kW at 148 miles)<\/a><\/p>\nhttp:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/650-CISL-CCPvsDT400WvsPL310vsCCSWvsTravIII.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

750\u00a0 KXTG\u00a0 Tigard, Oregon\u00a0 (50 kW at 123 miles)<\/a><\/p>\nhttp:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/750-KXTG-CCPvsDT400WvsPL310vsCCSWvsTravIII.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

1070\u00a0 CFAX\u00a0 Victoria, BC\u00a0 (10 kW at 100 miles)<\/a><\/p>\nhttp:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/1070-CFAX-CCPvsDT400WvsPL310vsCCSWvsTravIII.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

1320\u00a0 CHMB\u00a0 Vancouver, BC\u00a0 (50 kW at 148 miles)<\/a><\/p>\nhttp:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/1320-CHMB-CCPvsDT400WvsPL310vsCCSWvsTravIII.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

1470\u00a0 KELA\u00a0 Centralia, WA\u00a0 (5 kW at 45 miles)<\/a><\/p>\nhttp:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/1470-KELA-CCPvsDT400WvsPL310vsCCSWvsTravIII.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

1650\u00a0 Vashon TIS\u00a0 Vashon Island, WA (15 watts at 15 miles)<\/a><\/p>\nhttp:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/1650-VashonTIS-CCPvsDT400WvsPL310vsCCSWvsTravIII.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

Comments:<\/h3>\n

The CC Skywave and the Traveler III tend to break away from the pack receiving the weaker stations, with the edge going to the latter because of its superior audio clarity. The Eton\u2019s combination of excellent reception and high audio fidelity makes it the new Sensitivity Champion in the Ultralight radio class, although the CC Skywave is right behind it. The PL-310ET has fairly good sensitivity but is limited by its relatively muffled audio in the 1 kHz DSP setting, while the CC Pocket and DT-400W can\u2019t quite keep up with these larger models because of their shorter loopsticks. My own impression was that the DT-400W had a slight edge over the CC Pocket, but neither of these models are paragons of sensitivity in the current Shootout group. The CC Pocket\u2019s poor reception of 1070-CFAX was a puzzle\u2014the DT-400W had it at a fairly good level. The Sangean also clearly outperformed the CC Pocket in the 1470-KELA reception. Overall any of these models would be acceptable for routine DXing, but the Eton provides superior weak signal reception at a superior price.<\/p>\n

\"MW-Sensitivity-Winners\"<\/a><\/p>\n

MW Sensitivity Grades:<\/strong><\/h3>\n