{"id":19817,"date":"2016-07-08T06:00:46","date_gmt":"2016-07-08T10:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/?p=19817"},"modified":"2016-06-30T11:01:09","modified_gmt":"2016-06-30T15:01:09","slug":"guest-post-patrick-compares-four-receivers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2016\/07\/guest-post-patrick-compares-four-receivers\/","title":{"rendered":"Guest Post: Patrick compares four receivers"},"content":{"rendered":"

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Patrick Canler who writes to us from France and shares the following guest post which he translated into English:<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

\"4<\/a><\/p>\n

The number of receivers on the market\u00a0is quite large, and all are sold to be the \u201cbest\u201d. I have thought it useful to compare materials using them\u00a0in the shack as a neophyte SWL; going beyond the features in the brochures to talk about everyday utility. This article does not pretend to do “scientific” testing of the four receivers–skills and special equipment are needed and some specialized laboratories already do it.<\/p>\n

The four receivers cover thirty years of electronics manufacturing; four different brands with their own technology and specifications. Over such period, technologies and innovations\u00a0have evolved. One of the questions I had was:\u00a0“Does efficiency give any receiver an\u00a0advantage?”.<\/p>\n

The Contenders:<\/h2>\n

NRD-535 from Japan Radio Company.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"nrd535\"<\/a><\/p>\n

A reference of the 90s! It received 5 stars from WRTH (which publishes annually the almanac \u201cWorld Radio and TV Handook\u201d). The NRD-535 has conventional construction with an electronic card per function and discrete and analog filters.<\/p>\n

This is a home station receiver, weighing in at\u00a010 kg. The NRD-535 ceased to be produced in 1996, and its value\u00a0second hand is growing due to its reputation.<\/p>\n

AR7030 from AOR<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"ar7030\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Designed by the engineer who developed the LOWE receiver line, the AR7030 is also famous for its reception. It uses special ergonomics and a hybrid of software menus and conventional controls. Quite small, it is easily transportable, due its design\u00a0that already uses SMC but keeps the analog filters.<\/p>\n

IC-R75 ICOM<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"ICR75\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Modern device, classical format and renowned–the R75 is the only receiver tested that is still in production [Note: it was recently removed from production<\/a>]. It uses CMS, combines analog and DSP filtering (the DSP option is present on the device under test). Its ergonomic design is intuitive and so too are\u00a0controls and menus.<\/p>\n

1102S RADIOJET Bonito,<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"SDR<\/a><\/p>\n

The 1102S RADIOJET is the only unit in this comparison that is produced in Europe!
\nThe Radiojet includes the latest developments in technology, its performance\u00a0is simply\u00a0stunning on the data\/spec sheet. The application includes\u00a0many tools (spectrograph, digital filters, IF and AF recorders, decoder, list of broadcast stations, etc.). It brings together all the SMC receiving electronics in a small box that can fit in a pocket.<\/p>\n

\"SSDR<\/a><\/p>\n

The commands and tools are assigned to a software (highly evolved) that runs on the PC which is connected the SDR. The power of the PC also brings graphics, memory, recordings etc.<\/p>\n

Why these four rigs?<\/h2>\n

In the beginning, and it was it which led me to be SWL, I acquired the RADIOJET based on its announced characteristics: sensitivity of “secret services”, adaptable to all cases with filters, graphics tools–\u201cStar Wars equipment\u201d is not it! Later I learned about 50 MHz and at the same time I was struggling to exploit the Radiojet SDR.<\/p>\n

A good opportunity to purchase an ICOM R75 brought me back to\u00a0conventional radio ergonomics. As time passed, I felt my listening skills improved\u00a0with these 2 receivers and the receiver syndrome\u00a0grew! A Kenwood R5000 joined the others for its VHF potential and HF reputation.<\/p>\n

Then I discovered an NRD-525 on Ebay at a fair\u00a0price point (rare)–it joined the group of receivers. The latter two were sold and replaced respectively by an AOR 7030 and by NRD-535. I really enjoyed the 525, but the 535 is even better.<\/p>\n

In use, the RADIOJET and R75 have always posed problems with settings and sound quality. Kenwood reassured me about the fact that we could get some nice reception without fighting against the controls. validated by the AOR, the NRD 525 & 535. Perhaps I did not understand the manipulation of digital filters???<\/p>\n

Now to the shack!<\/h2>\n

The four receivers are placed side by side, but arranged so as not to disturb each other (eg. the display of the ND535 disrupted the RADIOJET).<\/p>\n

The antenna is a 25m random wire oriented East\/West\u00a0with 9:1 balun and its own ground. The passage from a receiver to the other is done by a conventional antenna switch.<\/p>\n

All the tests were performed in one evening for constant conditions, there was a fairly present QRM which, was not too bad for comparison purposes. The tests were made in SSB or AM. Preliminary tests had shown that the results in digital modes (PSK31, JT65, ..) relied more on the decoder performance of the PC rather than the receiver. The tests increased from the lowest frequency detected this evening (Europe 1-163 kHZ) to the highest (Foreign Broadcast =15,545 MHz).<\/p>\n

The highest frequencies, up to 30 MHz, were deserted in phone, at least for my installation.
\nThe procedure was:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Signal\u00a0is detected from the spectrograph SDR: it typically\u00a0“sees” almost inaudible signals.<\/li>\n
  2. The candidate frequency is tuned\u00a0on all four receivers<\/li>\n
  3. I listening to all of the signals on all receivers,\u00a0seeking to get the maximum performance, using all possibilities (notch, passband, IF Shift, integrated amplifiers, attenuator, etc.)<\/li>\n
  4. Results are reported in the table below.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    One can notice rather quickly:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • that age is not a handicap<\/li>\n
    • the number of functions is not always an advantage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
        \n
      • 1102S RADIOJET<\/strong>
        \nPerformance and capabilities above the rest (on paper) and requires being connected to a PC. At the present time, on an old Celeron 2Gb ram, the RadioJet’s application never saturated the CPU. The band\u00a0spectrum display\u00a0allows one to find the QSO, to filter theoretically perfectly, but it does not always equate to the understandability of the signal or give a pleasant audio. And the number of software features and functions complicates the signal manipulation. The sound is still a little metallic, perhaps due to the\u00a0signal processing software.\u00a0Its small size makes it a unbeatable mobile receiver for travel, functions are incredibly useful\u00a0for those who master the\u00a0RadioJet application.<\/li>\n
      • AOR AR7030<\/strong>
        \nInherently simpler at face value–the AR7030\u00a0is ultra easy to use. It makes it easy for the user to find and tweak a candidate signal. It’s intuitive and has essential functions only. It has well-designed electronics. The AR7030 is also best receiver tested for handling strong signals without overloading\u00a0(broadcasts stations or nearby hyper-kilowatted amateur radio operators) which seems to prove that it is designed for\u00a0these stations. Its limit is the lack of adaptive notch filter types to clean the noise, which is still quite present when the QRM is there. (The newer\u00a0version 7030+ has added features to help). Finally, it is the smallest stand-alone, portable and with 3 options of antennas connections.<\/li>\n
      • ICOM R75<\/strong>
        \nThe R75\u00a0climbs up the frequency band all the way to 50 MHz, the only receiver tested with this frequency range. It enjoys an excellent reputation, and can be equipped with a DSP (digital signal processing) on audio. The DSP provides adaptive noise reduction and automatic notch, but has a relative effectiveness which is not always successful in clarifying the signal. Sometimes it adds an unpleasant “rattling”. In use, the interface is pretty intuitive–mixing commands by buttons and menus. Twin pass band tuning (PBT)\u00a0is effective and allows for\u00a0IF Shift and\/or notch. The speaker is (very) small and gives an aggressive\/harsh sound. This receiver is relatively small in size and lightweight. It has a mobile stand and is designed for\u00a0a 12-14V power supply.<\/li>\n
      • JRC NRD-535<\/strong>
        \nThe NRD-535 is the\u00a0oldest tested–indeed, it was already discontinued\u00a0before the other receivers were in production.\u00a0A solid and reliable construction, good ergonomic with conventional front panel controls, good sensitivity, and a decent sized speaker have earned it status as a benchmark\u00a0in its time. Very sensitive, it extracts the signals and, once found the right filter, gives it pleasant audio. Some signals are not completely cleaned but it does rarely less than others.\u00a0The NRD-535 is designed for home use:\u00a0it is heavy, almost 10 kg, and is contains\u00a0several circuit boards which\u00a0should not be too exposed to excessive shocks, especially considering they’re over\u00a020 years old.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        Summary<\/h2>\n

        My ranking is as follows:<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. JRC NRD-535<\/strong> for its ease of use and ability to dig out a usable signal from the QRM.<\/li>\n
        2. AOR AR7030<\/strong>\u00a0for its simplicity, portability and the fact that it extract good sound\/audio quickly, even if a little noisy at times.<\/li>\n
        3. Bonito RADIOJET<\/strong> for its small size and its extensive feature set. It is ultra-mobile with a laptop.<\/li>\n
        4. ICOM R75\u00a0<\/strong>does the job and covers a wide frequency range. But lags in performance\u00a0relative to the other receiver tested, with a “nasal” sound and a DSP that does not keep its intended promises.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          About digital filters: the SDR and ICOM have them, the possibilities are extensive and allow adaptive filtering that others do not with analog filters. By cons they give a dry sound and sometimes add “snap” under whistles. Listening is overall less pleasant in comparison.<\/p>\n

          Receivers Advantages + \/ Disadvantages –<\/strong><\/p>\n

          Bonito RADIOJET<\/strong>
          \n+ Top technology, visual and many new features over the others on this point
          \n– Complicated, metallic sound, emphasizing the sometimes painful receiver interaction with a computer mouse<\/p>\n

          Icom R75<\/strong>
          \n+ Great value at the present time
          \n– Audio\u00a0and imperfect signal cleaning<\/p>\n

          AOR AR7030<\/strong>
          \n+ Simple and effective
          \n– Ideal companion if it had a\u00a0notch filter: noise is present<\/p>\n

          JRC NRD-535<\/strong>
          \n+ Effective sensitivity and clean\u00a0audio
          \n– Older technology,\u00a0less portable<\/p>\n

          Note that this is a personal opinion: a computer geek will certainly get the most of performance and possibilities from an SDR like the Bonito RadioJet.<\/p>\n

          The NRD-535 shows its age, will one day reach the end of its useful life\u00a0despite its robust construction. ICOM can cover up to 6m remaining mobile and has a good filter possibilities (DSP).\u00a0The AOR is easy, fast and gives a correct listening, general purpose. It is the only one to pass the VLF.<\/p>\n

          The ideal then?
          \n* RADIOJET for sensitivity,
          \n* The RADIOJET for tools\/features and functions
          \n* AR7030 for the lower bands
          \n* Icom for the higher bands
          \n* NRD-535 for ergonomics
          \n* AOR for portability<\/p>\n

          Personally, I use the\u00a0NRD-535 for DXing<\/strong> (due to\u00a0superior audio), the\u00a0AR7030 for digital modes<\/strong>,
          \nthe RADIOJET to visually search for signals<\/strong>, and to sometimes clarify the signal even better\u00a0and because it’s ultra-mobile and always in my PC case.<\/p>\n

          73,
          \nPatrick F61112<\/p>\n

          \n

          Thank you, Patrick! <\/em><\/p>\n

          I should mention that I think you did a fine job translating your article into English for us! I would not be as\u00a0successful writing an article in French!\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

          I’ve never owned a JRC of any sort. If I ever found an NRD-535 for a good price, I would purchase one without hesitation. I’ve never spent much time on the\u00a0AR7030\u00a0either. It’s simple “Lowe-like” front panel is quite appealing for field use. I found that the RadioJet audio is quite nice when paired with a good set of headphones.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Patrick Canler who writes to us from France and shares the following guest post which he translated into English: The number of receivers on the market\u00a0is quite large, and all are sold to be the \u201cbest\u201d. I have thought it useful to compare materials using them\u00a0in the shack as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3194,545,3,26,129,154],"tags":[5230,990,4815,5231,5232,5229,4085,4086],"class_list":["post-19817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-guest-posts","category-ham-radio","category-news","category-radios","category-reviews","category-shortwave-radio-reviews","tag-aor-ar7030","tag-bonito-radiojet-if-receiver-1102s","tag-icom-ic-r75","tag-japan-radio-company-nrd-535","tag-nrd-535","tag-patrick-canler","tag-reviews","tag-shortwave-radio-reviews"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pn3uc-59D","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":49440,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2021\/06\/dan-notes-vintage-jrc-receivers-set-price-records-in-japan\/","url_meta":{"origin":19817,"position":0},"title":"Dan Notes: Vintage JRC Receivers Set Price Records in Japan","author":"Thomas","date":"June 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, for the following guest post: Vintage JRC Receivers in Japan Set Price Records by Dan Robinson While used market prices for older vintage communications receivers have been dropping significantly in recent years, prices for some classic \"premium\" receivers -- particularly rare marine\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Guest Posts"","block_context":{"text":"Guest Posts","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/guest-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Right-side-cabinet-view-300x169.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Right-side-cabinet-view-300x169.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Right-side-cabinet-view-300x169.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Right-side-cabinet-view-300x169.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Right-side-cabinet-view-300x169.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":12992,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2015\/04\/dan-compares-the-mckay-dymek-dr33-c6-to-three-other-benchmark-receivers\/","url_meta":{"origin":19817,"position":1},"title":"Dan compares the McKay-Dymek DR33-C6 to three other benchmark receivers","author":"Thomas","date":"April 16, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who shares this YouTube video comparing\u00a0four\u00a0of his receivers: the McKay Dymek DR33-C6, the East German made RFT EKD 515, Japan Radio Company NRD-301A,\u00a0and his Watkins Johnson 8718A\/MFPWJ WJ\u00a0.","rel":"","context":"In "News"","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"DanRobinson-RadioComparison","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/DanRobinson-RadioComparison.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/DanRobinson-RadioComparison.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/DanRobinson-RadioComparison.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":30724,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2018\/02\/guest-post-a-review-of-the-icom-ic-r8600-wideband-sdr-receiver\/","url_meta":{"origin":19817,"position":2},"title":"Guest Post: A review of the Icom IC-R8600 wideband SDR receiver","author":"Thomas","date":"February 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who shares the following guest post: ICOM\u2019s IC-R8600:\u00a0 \u00a0Can this mega-radio stay in the ring with big gun \u201clegacy\u201d receivers when it comes to shortwave band reception? by Dan Robinson When ICOM rolled out its new wideband receiver, the IC-R8600, I immediately\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Guest Posts"","block_context":{"text":"Guest Posts","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/guest-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Icom-IC-R8600-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Icom-IC-R8600-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Icom-IC-R8600-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":12225,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2015\/02\/video-dan-compares-the-sony-icf-6800w-with-several-benchmark-receivers\/","url_meta":{"origin":19817,"position":3},"title":"Video: Dan compares the Sony ICF-6800W with several benchmark receivers","author":"Thomas","date":"February 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Check out this video of Dan Robinson comparing his Sony ICF-6800 with the JRC NRD-301A, Eddystone 1650\/9, RFT EKD-515, Drake R7A, and the WJ8718A\/MFP: Thanks for sharing, Dan! Impressive lineup!","rel":"","context":"In "News"","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Fullscreen capture 272015 13405 PM","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Fullscreen-capture-272015-13405-PM.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Fullscreen-capture-272015-13405-PM.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Fullscreen-capture-272015-13405-PM.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":53027,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2022\/06\/dan-believes-this-jrc-nrd-301a-will-acheive-record-price-at-auction\/","url_meta":{"origin":19817,"position":4},"title":"Dan believes this JRC NRD-301A will acheive record price at auction","author":"Thomas","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson who writes: An NRD-301A, still one of the rarest of JRC receivers, appears headed for a record selling price on the Japan Buyee site. In 2021, even rarer NRD-302A receivers sold in the $5000 range. Click here to check it out on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News"","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JRC-NRD.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JRC-NRD.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JRC-NRD.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JRC-NRD.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JRC-NRD.jpeg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":49924,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2021\/08\/dan-watches-record-setting-vintage-jrc-receiver-auction-prices\/","url_meta":{"origin":19817,"position":5},"title":"Dan watches record-setting vintage JRC receiver auction prices","author":"Thomas","date":"August 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who writes: The question is, will it go even higher than the two NRD-240s\u00a0a few months ago? https:\/\/buyee.jp\/item\/yahoo\/auction\/j1000312853?conversionType=item_browsing_history As collectors of premium receivers know, the Japan Radio Corporation (JRC) NRD-630 is among the rarest of radios. NRD-630s are almost never seen on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News"","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/JRC-NRD-630-Dial.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/JRC-NRD-630-Dial.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/JRC-NRD-630-Dial.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/JRC-NRD-630-Dial.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/JRC-NRD-630-Dial.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19817"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19817\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}