{"id":25107,"date":"2017-04-10T13:21:29","date_gmt":"2017-04-10T17:21:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/?p=25107"},"modified":"2018-08-28T06:35:06","modified_gmt":"2018-08-28T10:35:06","slug":"the-panasonic-rf-b65-the-legendary-portable-with-a-cult-following-amongst-dxers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2017\/04\/the-panasonic-rf-b65-the-legendary-portable-with-a-cult-following-amongst-dxers\/","title":{"rendered":"The Panasonic RF-B65: the legendary portable with a cult following amongst DXers"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Hi there, back in 1990 I was given a Panasonic RF-B40 for my birthday (I think it was my birthday…1990 was a long time ago!). I found that radio to be very sensitive on shortwave, more so perhaps than my Sangean ATS-803A, but ultimately it didn’t really add much value to any serious DXing because it would only tune on shortwave in 5 kHz steps. This rather course tuning arrangement was very limiting in terms of tuning out adjacent noise and copying tropical band – and other signals that weren’t\u00a0quite on-frequency etc. Frustrated, I \u00a0lent my RF-B40 to my brother a few years ago and serves me right; following a house move, he managed to lose it! Quite a shame really because almost three decades later, I would have been very interested to put the RF-B40 through it’s paces on a DXpedition or two. You really don’t see them in action very often at all these days.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>Above: the Panasonic RF-B40 (not mine – unfortunately) and the\u00a0RF-B60, mid-DXpedition!<\/em><\/p>\n

At that time, which was around the beginning of the 1990s, I read a review somewhere and it became clear that the better receiver was quite obviously the RF-B65. Upon it’s introduction into the market, the RF-B65 was immediately recognised as an excellent receiver, however, in the intervening years it’s reputation has continued to grow to the point today where it enjoys legendary status amongst DXers and bit of a cult following. There’s a lot of information on the RF-B65 to be found on the internet, so I won’t go into huge detail, but the obvious question is: what makes thsi receiver so special? Well, it’s a quite compact PPL double conversion receiver, covering 153 kHz to 29,999 kHz AM and 87.5 to 108 MHz, FM. It has a keypad for direct frequency input, although you have to press either the ‘FREQ’ or ‘METER’ buttons prior to punching in the numbers to define whether you wish to access a particular frequency, or band. I actually find that slightly annoying, but you easily learn to live with such trivial matters when using a radio of this quality and performance.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, there’s an electronic signal strength meter, a DX\/local attenuation switch, external antenna jack, SSB reception mode, 1 kHz tuning steps on shortwave (unlike it’s little brother the RF-B40) and fine tuning. The single bandwidth filter is 6 kHz wide and thus limits selectivity a little, although the SSB option and fine tune helps offset that somewhat. \u00a0It would have been nice to have a couple more filtering options, particularly narrower for serious DXing in crowded bands, to combat adjacent channel QRM. Build quality is generally excellent as you would have expected from a high-end Panasonic portable and with a very compact form-factor – roughly the size of a paperback book and weighing in at just 1.4 Ibs, it is eminently more portable than a Sony ICF-SW77 or the iconic\u00a0ICF-2001D\/2010.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Ultimately, the RF-B65 continues to enjoy an excellent reputation today, nearly 30 years after it was introduced because it is a wonderfully\u00a0sensitive receiver and arguably the best-ever performing shortwave portable in the paperback book size category – often touted as ‘travel portables’.\u00a0I managed to acquire an example in as-new condition from eBay, although mind you, I paid through the nose for it lol – that cult following ensures prices remain very robust! I have tested my example against the equally legendary Sony ICF-2001D, still considered by many to be the benchmark for shortwave portables, and in my experience the Panasonic is right up there with it. There’s virtually no difference whatsoever in sensitivity. Where the Panasonic comes a little unstuck is the lack of bandwidth filtering and SYNC, leading to lower selectivity. However, clever use of SSB and fine tuning does provide quite good\u00a0compensation for these shortcomings. Overall though, given it’s size, sensitivity, build quality and audio, as a complete package, in my opinion, the RF-B65 is\u00a0equal to the ICF-2001D, and this is why today, it remains so highly sought after.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Below are embedded reception videos and text links to the Oxford Shortwave Log YouTube channel<\/a>, with various DX catches on the RF-B65. Some of these are considered quite rare in Europe, for example EXPPM\u00a0Radio Educaci\u00f3n’s 1 kW signal from Mexico City, the now defunct ABC Northern Territories on 120 metres and Radio Bandeirantes from Sao Paolo, Brazil, amongst others. Please note; right at the bottom of this post is a link to some very recent comparisons with the brilliant Eton Satellit – one of the very best portables currently on the market today. The vintage Panasonic holds its own, despite 30 years of supposed technical innovation in electronics. Thanks for reading\/watching\/listening and I wish you all great DX.<\/p>\n

\n