{"id":49653,"date":"2021-07-22T07:49:46","date_gmt":"2021-07-22T11:49:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/?p=49653"},"modified":"2021-07-25T07:05:40","modified_gmt":"2021-07-25T11:05:40","slug":"guest-post-and-review-test-driving-the-russia-made-malahit-dsp-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2021\/07\/guest-post-and-review-test-driving-the-russia-made-malahit-dsp-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Guest Post &#038; Review: Test Driving the Russia-Made Malahit DSP-2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Many thanks to\u00a0<em>SWLing Post<\/em>\u00a0contributor,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/tag\/dan-robinson\">Dan Robinson<\/a>, for the following guest post:<\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-49680\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"722\" height=\"512\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg 722w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1-300x213.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1-624x443.jpeg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 722px) 100vw, 722px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h1><b>Test Driving The Russia-Made Malahit DSP-2<\/b><\/h1>\n<h3><b>P<\/b><b>oised on Edge of Greatness?\u00a0 (Some Challenges To Overcome)<\/b><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong>by Dan Robinson<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>By now, the Malahit SDR is well known in listening hobby circles.\u00a0 We have the made-in-Russia original, and those manufactured in China with various firmware and some physical differences such as location of the tuning encoders.<\/p>\n<p>News about the Malahit began to spread in 2019, with <a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2019\/11\/the-new-malahit-dsp-a-portable-all-in-one-wideband-sdr-receiver\/\">articles<\/a> here on the <em>SWLing Post<\/em>, including two in February and April of 2020 (<a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2020\/02\/the-malahit-dsp-a-potential-holy-grail-portable-sdr\/\">https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2020\/02\/the-malahit-dsp-a-potential-holy-grail-portable-sdr\/<\/a> and one in which the Malahit was put up against an Afedri LAN-IQ SDR (<a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2020\/04\/fenu-posts-a-malahit-dsp-afedri-lan-iq-head-to-head-comparison\/\">https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2020\/04\/fenu-posts-a-malahit-dsp-afedri-lan-iq-head-to-head-comparison\/<\/a> ).<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, we saw the development and appearance of the Belarusian Belka SDR.\u00a0 I consider the latest Belka DX to be the ideal portable \u2013 a sensitive diminutive miracle that has become a must-have device for many of us.<\/p>\n<p>As for the Afedri LAN-IQ, I held off on purchasing one until the \u201cStandalone\u201d version was available.\u00a0 It is made in Israel by a Russian developer who supports the receiver with fairly frequent firmware revisions (though upgrading remains a bit of a challenge involving some obscure boot-loading software).<\/p>\n<p>I waited and observed reviews of the original versions of the Malahit.\u00a0 When its designer, Georgiy (RX9CIM), announced availability of the new DSP-2 version of the receiver, with expanded coverage to 2 GHz and a claim of improved performance, I finally purchased one.<\/p>\n<p>As was observed in one of the early <em>SWLing Post<\/em> articles \u201cIt seem[ed] the project is open source, the schematic, PCB and software are available to download. . . we hope [these] receivers become popular and available world wide [and that] this new project \u201cshakes\u201d a bit the industry of shortwave receivers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Malahit project authors RX9CIM George, R6DAN Vladimir, and R6DCY Vadim, had the apparent objective of \u201cdesigning a low-cost portable SDR radio, using only easily obtainable components and to become the natural successor of the popular Degen and Tecsun radios.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At the time, the price for a finished Malahit, with an ARM chip at its center was about $195 US.\u00a0 Coverage was to 1 GHz \u2013 this has since been extended to 2 GHz.\u00a0 Synchronous AM mode was added, and the DSP-2 also comes with an internal battery tray for a single 18650 Li-on battery.<\/p>\n<p>This is a change from the original flat Li-on cell, and in my opinion a welcome one\u00a0 since 18650s are easily obtainable.\u00a0 Being able to easily change out a battery is important, rather than messing around with soldering (the famous Reuter Pocket\u00a0receiver made in Germany should take a hint).<\/p>\n<p>In this age of the SDR, we&#8217;re all familiar with the SDRplay series and various AirSpy receivers, along with other SDRs such as the RX666\/888.\u00a0 Before that, we had the famous Perseus, which still has a strong following, and numerous WinRadio receivers.<\/p>\n<p>See the articles here on the <em>SWLing Post<\/em> assessing the performance of these, as well as reviews at eHam.net, and numerous SDR dongles all over eBay, coming from China.\u00a0 There is also <a href=\"https:\/\/groups.io\/g\/NextGenSDRs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">an SDR group on Groups.io<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, receivers and transceivers with panoramic displays began to appear some years ago \u2013 the ICOM IC-R8600 and IC-7300 are examples of how this technology was integrated into the listening and amateur radio markets.<\/p>\n<p>What we had not seen was integration of this kind of technology into portables.\u00a0 Even in its latest iteration, the Belka DX has a small screen without any PAN display.\u00a0 So, the advent of the Malahit has made this kind of advanced display widely available.<\/p>\n<p>The price, by the way, for my DSP-2 as of July 2021 was 19,500 Russian rubles, with an extra 2,000 rubles for express delivery via Russian Post (though due to COVID Georgiy stressed that no guarantees could be made as to timing).\u00a0 That&#8217;s $263 \u2013 not a small investment and rivaling the cost of a Tecsun ATS-909x and H-501x.<\/p>\n<p>According to the description I received when ordering, the Malahit DSP-2 was improved over the previous version with the following differences:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li aria-level=\"1\">Frequency range &#8211; from 50 kHz to 380 MHz, and 400 MHz to 2 GHz<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li aria-level=\"1\">Improved RF shielding and hardware improvements to reduce interference<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li aria-level=\"1\">Changes in software functions<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li aria-level=\"1\">Dimensions changed to 140x 88x 39mm<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">18650 battery<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The DSP-2 is in a thin black metal cabinet with dimensions 5 x \u00bd by 3 x \u00bd by 1 x \u00bd.<\/p>\n<p>A power button and headphone jack are on the right along with a power LED.\u00a0 On the\u00a0top, we find the SMA antenna input, and a small telescopic whip is included.<\/p>\n<p>The speaker, capable of some decent audio, is located on the inside rear of the\u00a0receiver \u2013 audio level exceeds that of the Belka DX with its very small speaker,\u00a0but the Belka has a clarity that often exceeds the Malahit.<\/p>\n<p>My first testing of the DSP-2 was indoors, in a far corner on the top floor of my home, using just the included whip antenna. \u00a0 For comparisons, I used a Tecsun PL-368 with its whip antenna and a Belka DX in the same location.\u00a0 I find that indoor testing tends to identify some issues that would not be apparent outdoors.<\/p>\n<p>In this, the Tecsun PL-368 and other Tecsun portables consistently performed best, followed by the Belka DX and the Malahit.\u00a0 This may be surprising, but shows that\u00a0radios specifically designed for shortwave reception, often provide better reception\u00a0because they are matched better with their internal telescopic antennas.<\/p>\n<p>Now, when I say \u201cbest\u201d I mean best basic audio quality, using auto-memory and ETM functions on the PL-368 and 990x.\u00a0 But what those radios can do with the signal after that point is pretty limited \u2013 there is no NR (noise reduction), you&#8217;re limited to a handful of set bandwidth selections, and SYNC mode leaves much to be desired.<\/p>\n<p>Which is where the Malahit comes in with its numerous levels of flexibility, accessed through MENU icons on the lower part of the screen:\u00a0 HARD, AUDIO, VISUAL, NR, MODE, and BAND.\u00a0 I refer the reader to the <a href=\"https:\/\/malahiteam.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Malahitteam<\/a> site links showing the user manual (this is still a bit in the rough, with translation from Russian) and another <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1B91QgAFjhXs4GZ8YSJHnx5TVUWcRBAR3\/view\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">link<\/a> with a Quick Start guide written by John Pitz (KD8CIV).<\/p>\n<h1><b>KEY HIGH POINTS ON MALAHIT<\/b><\/h1>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-49678\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"361\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1.jpeg 800w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-300x135.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-768x347.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-624x282.jpeg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h2><b><i>SUPERIOR COLOR DISPLAY<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>The color display, also seen on numerous China-made clones, is the best on any handheld SDR.\u00a0 Where the Belka LCD is a basic utilitarian tool that performs well for that receiver, the Malahit display is an invitation to the wonderland of what this receiver offers.<\/p>\n<p>At the top are small icons for:\u00a0 SQ, NB, NR, AGC, ANT, PRE, MODE.\u00a0 Right of center, and controlled with pushes of the small volume encoder knob, are ATT, VOL, FILTER, and the battery icon.\u00a0 Below those are headphone and speaker icons and an excellent, if small, frequency window.\u00a0 Pushing the small encoder knob selects\/controls volume, attenuation, and main filters.\u00a0 The large tuning knob, with a press, selects step increments.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>EXCELLENT NOISE REDUCTION<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>Noise reduction on the Malahit is superb, as many users have observed.\u00a0 It&#8217;s activated directly with a front panel icon and Threshold is adjustable with an icon under AUDIO, with 0 to 30 increments.\u00a0 NR is so good that I compare it with the latest firmware version on the ICOM IC-R8600 \u2013 it&#8217;s actually probably better than the ICOM even near and at the highest 30 level.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>EXCELLENT FILTERING<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>Whereas the Belka DX offers fixed audio filtering values accessible via its front panel, the Malahit DSP-2 offers continually variable LOW FREQUENCY adjustment from 0 Hz to 2350 Hz, and HIGH FREQUENCY adjustment from 100 Hz all the way up to 150,000 Hz. \u00a0 This is in addition to standard NARROW, NORMAL, and WIDE filter options selectable with the volume encoder knob.\u00a0 This is nothing short of extraordinary for a handheld portable receiver.<\/p>\n<p>The latest (and possibly last) Tecsun receivers offer set value multiple bandwidths, which is excellent but is a throwback to radio design from years ago.\u00a0 So, the DSP-2 capabilities can be compared to the kind of filtering that a Watkins Johnson or Cubic receiver have, but in the palm of your hand.<\/p>\n<p>As I often observe, what we would have given in gold to have this kind of capability in consumer receivers during the glory days of international broadcasting!<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>AGC \/ MGC FLEXIBILITY<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>The Malahit allows the listener to use AGC, with choices of SLOW, MEDIUM, and FAST.\u00a0 But it also allows, again through the AUDIO settings menu, control of AGC GAIN 0 to 60, and AGC LIMITER 40 to 90 db.\u00a0 Wow \u2013 priceless!\u00a0 So even if you prefer, as I do, to listen to shortwave using AGC, you still have amazing flexibility.\u00a0 You can still switch to MGC with 0 to 60 range.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>NOISE BLANKER FLEXIBILITY<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>Just as the Malahit delivers on AGC, so does it deliver with its regular noise blanker function.\u00a0 With NB activated, there are 3 configurations with a separate THRESHOLD icon adjustable for each of these.\u00a0 Amazing.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>RF GAIN FLEXIBILITY<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>RF GAIN is adjustable from 0 to 59, and there is a separate icon for adjusting gain for the PRE-AMPLIFIER.\u00a0 Where the PREAMP comes in very handy is when one has the Malahit indoors \u2013 it provides a more sensitivity in situations where one is using the telescopic whip antenna, though care must still be taken not to overload the receiver and distort signals.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>FCORRECT FUNCTION MAKES FOR EASY RE-CALIBRATION<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>The <b>Fcorrect<\/b> function located under the HARD settings menu enables one to re-calibrate the receiver to correct for error.\u00a0 This is similar to the capability that Tecsun added to its 330, 909x and 501x receivers (there are indications Tecsun has or will enable this ability also in the PL-368) but seems, based on my testing of the Malahit to be more effective.\u00a0 After I corrected my DSP-2 to about +57, calibration was pretty much on the money up and down the HF bands.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>SQUELCH FLEXIBLITY<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>The Malahit not only has SQUELCH, but SQUELCH THRESHOLD control, another example of the tremendous flexibility in this receiver&#8217;s firmware.\u00a0 Since I do not do much listening outside of the HF bands, or have the antenna for it, I have not extensively tested the Squelch above 30 MHz and up to the maximum range at 2 GHz.<\/p>\n<p>There is yet another feature described as adaptive noise canceling that allows the user to significantly improve the intelligibility of the received station under conditions noise and interference.<\/p>\n<p>[From the manual]:\u00a0 The squelch uses different algorithms [depending] on filter bandwidth.\u00a0 With a bandwidth of more than 1 kHz, a squelch of more than suitable for speech type signal.\u00a0 With bandwidth less than or equal to 1 kHz, the squelch is suitable for tone type signals.\u00a0 Choice of algorithm is carried out automatically, depending on bandwidth.\u00a0 Meanwhile, squelch for speech signals can be used with NR (see further details on this in the manual).<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>FM RECEPTION WITH RDS<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>What the Belka DX lacks, namely reception of the FM range, the Malahit delivers in droves.\u00a0 FM sounds excellent to me, on the same level perhaps of the Afedri LAN-IQ Standalone receiver.<\/p>\n<p>RDS is enabled by touching the waterfall area of the display which brings up the RDS information.\u00a0 The speed with which station information appears varies depends on position of your antenna and signal level.<\/p>\n<p>As one user (Harold Hermanns) on the Facebook Malahit group observed:\u00a0 <em>\u201c I don&#8217;t think it works very well. I just checked mine, and went to about 25 stations. The RDS or station name came up on only 5 stations. Letters I get are PS, PT, and PTY. When you tune a strong station, give it a minute or so, that&#8217;s what I did, and the RDS feature does wor<\/em>k<em>, but again, it&#8217;s not 100%.\u00a0 Maybe will be improved with firmware?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The RDS information could be better organized \u2013 currently the name of the station, and name of the program scrolls on different lines.\u00a0 Another touch of the screen brings up an old style FM scale \u2013 this is nice, but I prefer the PAN display.\u00a0 Yet another touch returns the screen to the PAN display and waterfall.\u00a0 Mode options include NFM and WFM, and another option provides FM-STEREO.\u00a0 Also in FM, there is an auto-search function and station labeling<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>MISCELLANEOUS FEATURES<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>There are some other features in the mind-boggling list of options in various menus:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">In FM (WFM) there is an eight position EQUALIZER function with SOFT, LIVE, CLUB, ROCK, BASS, JAZZ, POP, and VOICE positions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">A voltage monitoring function allows the user to turn off the receiver when voltage drops lower than 3.3 volts.\u00a0 As explained in the manual this is intended to preserve battery life and avoid full discharge.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">Antenna selection can be 50 ohms or Hi-Z (preferred for telescopic antenna use).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">As the Malahit manual details, internal gain of the receiving chip can be adjusted.\u00a0 Accessed from the HARD menu, this is too much for me to go into here, but it&#8217;s another example of the detail that went into designing the Malahit.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">Brightness of the display backlight is adjustable as well as time after which backlight level is reduced to minimum and turned off completely.\u00a0 Rate of change of the display spectrum is adjustable as is spectrum display range, color, ratio of waterfall and speed and brightness of waterfall.\u00a0 Spectrum scale and view are adjustable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\">There is a 5 page memory system, with M1 to M10 in each, so a total of 50 storable memories.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><b>LOW POINTS OF THE MALAHIT<\/b><\/h1>\n<h2><b><i>NOISE FROM THE DISPLAY<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<div id=\"attachment_49673\" style=\"width: 818px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132818.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-49673\" class=\"wp-image-49673 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132818.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"808\" height=\"490\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132818.jpg 808w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132818-300x182.jpg 300w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132818-768x466.jpg 768w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132818-624x378.jpg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 808px) 100vw, 808px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-49673\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Example of noise on 1,000 kHz<\/p><\/div>\n<p>As I was testing my Malahit DSP-2 it quickly became clear that there is one major\u00a0low point, and thus a challenge for Georgiy and other members of the design team.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no other way to say this:\u00a0 <b>internally-generated noise remains the major issue keeping the Malahit from achieving greatness.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132858.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-49674\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132858.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"941\" height=\"544\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132858.jpg 941w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132858-300x173.jpg 300w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132858-768x444.jpg 768w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132858-624x361.jpg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 941px) 100vw, 941px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The developers of the Russian version receiver have not attempted to hide this, and users noticed it from the beginning, with one writer identifying<em> \u201cinternally generated noise, which peaks at various frequencies\u201d<\/em> as one of the key drawbacks of the Malahit.<\/p>\n<p>I had hopes that the DSP-2 version of the Russian-originated Malahit might have less\u00a0of this problem.\u00a0 There are numerous internally-generated noise\/buzzing spikes, some stronger than others, by my estimation at intervals between 125 and 200 kHz throughout the HF bands.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_49670\" style=\"width: 922px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132709.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-49670\" class=\"wp-image-49670 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132709.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"912\" height=\"562\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132709.jpg 912w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132709-300x185.jpg 300w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132709-768x473.jpg 768w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210720_132709-624x385.jpg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 912px) 100vw, 912px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-49670\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Example of noise on 6,000 kHz (RHC)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In the case of one huge noise spike appearing at or around 6,000 kHz \u2013 right over Radio Havana \u2013 it ruins any chance of hearing clear signals at, below and above that point.\u00a0 As you can see in my video, the Belka DX does not have this problem (<em>note: apologies for mis-spelling Malahit as Malachit<\/em>).<\/p>\n<h3>VIDEO: Malahit With Display Generated Noise<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"625\" height=\"352\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/W69DF-WGUMo?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/W69DF-WGUMo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Click here to view on YouTube.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Via Telegram, Georgiy asserted to me that when using an external antenna, noise is not as serious, and notes differences between the Malahit and Belka.\u00a0 The Belka, he says, is a simpler device that concentrates only on shortwave, while Malahit is a wide band receiver with more complex DSP and user functions.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cWhen Belka cannot receive something, Malahit can.\u00a0 And where Belka does not have noise, Malahit has it.\u00a0 These devices are in different classes.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The result is that a major workaround is often necessary \u2013 to <b>disable the VIEW PAN&amp;WTF option<\/b>, a key feature that is a major highlight of the radio.<\/p>\n<p>Georgiy says that this problem is mainly linked to telescopic antenna antenna operation because of the antenna&#8217;s proximity to the display.\u00a0 But as you can see in my video, when testing the Malahit and Belka on 6,000 kHz it&#8217;s a night and day situation.<\/p>\n<p>A quick push of the power button blanks out the display completely \u2013 and seems to completely resolve the noise issue.\u00a0 But you don&#8217;t buy a radio to see a dark display, and it&#8217;s depressing to think that turning off a major feature, namely panoramic display, has to be part of standard operating procedure.<\/p>\n<p>When testing the Malahit from its bottom frequency of 50 kHz, even with the PAN &amp; WTF off, huge buzzing noise spikes are heard.\u00a0 In mediumwave\/AM, they are seen at\u00a0 615 kHz, 790 kHz, 965 kHz, 1140 kHz and so on.<\/p>\n<p>If a radio had emerged from a known large manufacturer with this issue, such as Tecsun or Sangean, it would have been roundly condemned by users and reviewers and sent back to the drawing board.<\/p>\n<p>Georgiy does say that in the new firmware interference from the display was decreased, with a <em>\u201cstep of about 2.5 MHz, from 1MHz (i.e. 1MHz, 3.5MHz, 6MHz).\u00a0 After correction it will be with a step [of] 4 MHz\u201d.<\/em>\u00a0 I&#8217;m not quite sure what he&#8217;s saying with this, due to language issues, but the overall indication is that he is aware of\u00a0 this\u00a0issue and will continue trying to tackle it in future revisions.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>CW DECODING<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>In the MODE section of the Malahit there is no confirmation that the receiver is actually in CW.\u00a0 Decoding is enabled with an icon, but again no confirming icon at the top of the display.\u00a0 This is a bit odd.<\/p>\n<p>Going to the Telegram app discussion group for the Malahit, and re-reading the translated Russian manual, I discovered that confirmation of CW appears as a white bar under the SPEAKER\/HEADPHONE icon on the right.\u00a0 There is also a MINIMUM SNR option in decoding, with a 0 to 70 range.<\/p>\n<p>A You Tube <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xaD9qNFNCpE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">video<\/a> (the Gerry DX channel) shows the decoding process and notes that it&#8217;s important to keep the filter setting at NARROW when attempting to use the decoding feature on the Malahit and also important to set the SNR at the right level.<\/p>\n<p>One would think that this could be easily rectified, but adding a CW indicator to the top row of small icons on the front display might not be as easy as one thinks, unless the display can be modified to also display \u201cCW\u201d in the icon spaces for AM, LSB, or USB.<\/p>\n<p>It turns out that CW decoding on the Malahit works quite well, at least in my attempts.\u00a0 I was able to decode fairly strong CW signals in 40 meters.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>LCD\/TOUCH SENSITIVITY<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>When I first got the Malahit, I was puzzled by what seemed to be a serious lack of sensitivity on the display when trying to use the touch icons to change configurations and modes.<\/p>\n<p>This was so bothersome that I raised it with Georgiy who responded that this is by design.\u00a0 The present capacitive touch method, he says, is preferable and more comfortable for users. \u00a0<em> \u201cIf [we were to] change the touch [enable faster response] then [some] people will demand to decrease it.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>With benefit of some time, I have concluded that a slightly firmer and longer press of about half a second to a second almost always brings up the menu selected.\u00a0 But this is definitely a characteristic of the DSP-2, so potential owners should be aware of it.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>ISSUE WITH CLOCK<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<p>Another issue that prospective purchasers should be aware of involves instances where the internal clock of the receiver does not retain the time, and the solution for this directly from Georgiy is not necessarily satisfactory.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cYes, they need to be removed from the PCB\u201d<\/em> he says, a reference to two capacitors on the main PCB, C29 and C30 which are next to each other below a larger M7 device on the PCB.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/PCB-Malahit.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-49677\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/PCB-Malahit.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"576\" height=\"820\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/PCB-Malahit.jpg 576w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/PCB-Malahit-211x300.jpg 211w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 576px) 100vw, 576px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>These are SMDs so anyone without good soldering skills will be hard pressed to want to mess around with that PCB.\u00a0 This is not a confidence-builder, nor a solution \u2013 clearly these receivers should come from the supplier without such an issue.<\/p>\n<p>This was upsetting enough for some users that the Malahit team faced some sharp criticisms.\u00a0 One user said the clock on his DSP-2 was working perfectly.\u00a0 Another said: <em>\u201cUnless I power off the unit the date stays good but the time is always 2 hrs and 10 minutes behind. As soon as I power off the unit the date defaults back to 15:08:2062.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>One user said:\u00a0 <em>\u201cProblem is voltage is very inaccurate causing the clock settings to be lost. I have tried several 18650 batteries (good Panasonics) and fully charged they are 4.2v, but the DSP-2 indicates 4.6v. When the battery runs down to 4.0v the clock settings are lost. Also, the battery indicator continues to show FULL. I think there is an internal problem with the DSP2. Perhaps the new design, or new internal parts are causing this. This is very disconcerting.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In exchanges on Telegram, Georgiy said he personally checks each outgoing Malahit for sensitivity on each band, and clock operation, among other things.\u00a0 In a later comment just before this article went to press, Georgiy said that C29\/C30 <b>should be replaced only if there is a problem with the clock<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>There is no mention by the Malahit team of any official return policy \u2013 which of course would be quite challenging and costly involving an additional round trip for a receiver back to Russia and then back again to the user.<\/p>\n<p>On my DSP-2, which I have used with an Anker 26800 USB battery, so far my clock\/date settings have maintained accuracy with no reset, even after the USB cable is unplugged from the receiver.\u00a0 I have not yet tested longer times to see if the clock\/date is reset when voltage drops below a certain point.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>[UPDATE: 22 July 2021]<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>In a message sent after publication, Georgiy says that the C29 and C30 capacitors will be deleted from the next series of the Malahit, and for now they are being removed from receivers that have not been sold yet.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>[UPDATE 23 July 2021]<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Further testing revealed that the observations of Malahit users are accurate. When voltage of a 18650B battery in my Malahit dropped below 3.7 v the receiver did indeed shut down \u2014 this is with the battery icon still showing 50%. So this is definitely an issue that needs to be addressed in future updates. That said, I got hours of operating time before the full 18650 dropped to the cutoff level &#8212; but obviously an inaccurate battery icon is something that the Malahit team will have to correct.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>THE BATTERY GAME<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<div id=\"attachment_49681\" style=\"width: 810px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/18650-batteries.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-49681\" class=\"wp-image-49681 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/18650-batteries.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"493\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/18650-batteries.jpeg 800w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/18650-batteries-300x185.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/18650-batteries-768x473.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/18650-batteries-624x385.jpeg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-49681\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Example of 18650 rechargeable batteries<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The Malahit DSP-2 uses a 18650 Li-on battery.\u00a0 Unfamiliar to many people, these are actually well known among professional-grade flashlight collectors\/users (flashlight collecting is another of my vices).<\/p>\n<p>One of the first things I realized when my Malahit arrived was that my existing button top 18650 cells were too long to comfortably fit in the battery tray.\u00a0 A bit of research on the Facebook Malahit group <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/groups\/malahitdsp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">page<\/a> revealed that some users have modified the receiver to take two 18650 cells, with a double tray replacing the single tray.<\/p>\n<p>The original Malahit tray requires shorter \u201cunprotected\u201d flat top 18650 cells.\u00a0 At the time I write this, there is a shortage of these cells at the major battery \/ flashlight suppliers (Battery Junction is one).\u00a0 <strong>DO NOT<\/strong> try to force a slightly larger 18650 in the stock Malahit battery tray!<\/p>\n<p>So, one recommendation I would make to the Malahit Team in Russia would be to make it possible for the receiver to use regular protected button top 18650s, of the type one would easily use in a Tecsun receiver such as the 909x and H-501x.<\/p>\n<p>However, in a message to me just before this article went to press, Georgiy said that the Malahit team has used \u201ctypical holders\u201d available to them and that they had been unable to obtain a sufficient number of alternative trays for protected 18650 button top batteries.\u00a0 So, for now at least the Malahit will require unprotected flat tops.<\/p>\n<p>My 18650B flat top batteries arrived just as I was completing this review \u2013 easily charged up in my Littokala charger, each then fit easily in the single battery tray and power the Malahit perfectly.<\/p>\n<h2><b><i>ENCODER KNOBS<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<div id=\"attachment_49675\" style=\"width: 1235px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-2.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-49675\" class=\"wp-image-49675 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-2.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1225\" height=\"1280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-2.jpeg 1225w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-2-287x300.jpeg 287w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-2-980x1024.jpeg 980w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-2-768x802.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-2-624x652.jpeg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1225px) 100vw, 1225px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-49675\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Higher quality replacement knobs<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The original encoder knobs on the Malahit can be replaced by higher quality, metal construction ones for the small and larger knobs.\u00a0 I got mine from Nikolay, a member in Russia of the Malahit Facebook group (he says he sources them from Switzerland, but I have not confirmed this). <a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-49676\" src=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1234\" height=\"1280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs.jpeg 1234w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-289x300.jpeg 289w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-987x1024.jpeg 987w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-768x797.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Replacement-encoder-knobs-624x647.jpeg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1234px) 100vw, 1234px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I am, however, not sure that the new knobs can simply be installed on the Malahit \u2013 there are no set screws on the original plastic Malahit knobs and I chose not to mess around to see whether the metal knobs can easily be installed, at least for now.\u00a0 Price for the higher quality metal knobs:\u00a0 $17<\/p>\n<h3><strong>[UPDATE 23 July 2021]<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Nikolay Vedeneev in Russia produces high quality encoder knobs for the Malahit, Afedri, and Belka SDR receivers. He can be reached at: <a href=\"mailto:nickstrannik@gmail.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">nickstrannik@gmail.com<\/a> and received a very positive review from Fernando Duarte who is known for his reviews of numerous receivers. Both of his knobs fit perfectly on the shafts of my Malahit DSP-2 and have a much better feel than the originals (NOTE: I used a 1.5 mm hex key to tighten the set screws) <a href=\"https:\/\/fenuradio.blogspot.com\/2020\/07\/custom-tuning-knopfe-fur-jedes-gerat.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/fenuradio.blogspot.com\/2020\/07\/custom-tuning-knopfe-fur-jedes-gerat.html<\/a><\/p>\n<h1>VIDEO<\/h1>\n<p><span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"625\" height=\"352\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/umM-ZO-GJDA?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/umM-ZO-GJDA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Click here to view on YouTube.<\/a><\/p>\n<h1><b>POISED ON THE EDGE OF GREATNESS<\/b><\/h1>\n<p>The subtitle of this article asks whether the Malahit is poised on the edge of greatness.\u00a0 I believe it is, but anyone&#8217;s choice to join the Malahit user\/fan club comes with some headaches.<\/p>\n<p>We can only hope that the Malahit team can work on the problem of noise spikes that permeate the lower frequency ranges from mediumwave on up.\u00a0 There&#8217;s no way to minimize this:\u00a0 at $263 (the price of a DSP-2 as of July 2021) buyers should not have to be shutting off the display to eliminate noise.<\/p>\n<p>As for the question of the clock on the DSP-2 not maintaining time\/date, etc it&#8217;s clear that Georgiy and the Malahit team are aware of this issue and one hopes this could be checked off the list of concerns that users have raised.<\/p>\n<p>Whether one needs all the bells and whistles that a Malahit offers is the major question, especially when the Belka DX offers excellent stepped (not continuously adjustable) audio filtering and a form of synchronous AM detection in what has to be the smallest high performance receiver ever available to the listener.<\/p>\n<p>More than a few Malahit owners have observed that between 1.5 MHz and 30 MHz <a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2020\/11\/belka-dx-a-pocket-sized-radio-for-pocket-change\/\">the Belka DX<\/a> seems to be the better shortwave receiver, with no display noise issues, superb battery life and an amazing small size that makes it the ultimate ultra-portable.<\/p>\n<p>In short, if you choose to step aboard the Malahit train you enter a world where there will be constant improvements in software and hardware, and bugs along the way, of which noise spikes issue is a perfect example.\u00a0 But if you&#8217;re someone who gets enjoyment from being on the leading edge of technology in radio development, the Malahit may be for you.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s impressive that the Malahit originated in Russia, not generally been known for innovations at this level.\u00a0 In recent years, Asia was the main source of advances from the likes of ICOM, Yaesu, AOR etc in the amateur radio area, and from Tecsun, Sangean, and Eton in the area of portable receivers for HF listeners.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, one has to wonder about the potential that the Malahit design holds for integration into the kind of portables seen over the past two years.\u00a0 Some observers have asked why the LCD display and other features on the Malahit could not be part of a future receiver that looks like a Tecsun 990x or Sangean 909&#215;2 with additional advances such as off-air microSD recording, and DRM.<\/p>\n<p><strong>FINAL ASSESSMENT:<\/strong>\u00a0 I boarded the Malahit bus fairly late, but I am definitely a fan.\u00a0 Owning one of these receivers is indeed a roller coaster \u2013 anyone climbing on should become a member of the Facebook and other discussion groups where users exchange views, suggestions, and their own experiences.<\/p>\n<p>For ultimate portability in 2021, the Belka DX wins the race.\u00a0 But the Malahit wins on the sheer number of advanced signal processing and other features it contains, though it is hobbled to an extent by the problem of display interference.<\/p>\n<p>If Georgiy and the Malahit team can continue to make steady progress in confronting the noise issue and fine tune the already amazing array of features, the Russia-made Malahit has a bright future ahead.<\/p>\n<h3>[UPDATE 24 July 2021]<\/h3>\n<p>In the latest firmware update to the Malahit DSP-2, Georgiy provides this<br \/>\nchangelog. Note that this is still described as &#8220;TEST&#8221; firmware, so it&#8217;s still unclear<br \/>\nwhether he intends to put out a non-TEST version of this particular upgrade:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Firmware 2.10 TEST:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>fixed battery voltage indication<\/li>\n<li>fixed behavior of encoder buttons at low supply voltage<\/li>\n<li>protection against false switching has been made &#8211; for switching on by three, set switch 2 to the On position.<\/li>\n<li>added test function &#8211; increased display frequency. This reduces noise and increases the number of frames per second; To enable this function, set switch 3 to On. The function may not work correctly, if so, please let me know<\/li>\n<li>the level of interference from the display is slightly reduced<\/li>\n<li>changed the distribution of frequencies to which the input high-pass filters are turned on<\/li>\n<li>when HiZ is turned on, the power supply of the external active antenna is automatically turned off;<\/li>\n<li>added indication of external antenna power on &#8211; now the ANT indicator is highlighted in red if this function is enabled<\/li>\n<li>the algorithm for displaying the picture on the display, slightly reduces the level of interference<\/li>\n<li>changed the panorama display mode from &#8220;Pan &amp; WTF Disabled \/ Enabled&#8221; to &#8220;Pan &amp; WTF Single \/ Always&#8221;, while the panorama image is now always present, but it is updated once (when the settings are changed) or always.<\/li>\n<li>fixed attenuators bugs<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>[UPDATE 2, 24 July 2021 ]<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2021\/07\/malahit-dsp-2-review-update-dan-recommends-holding-off-until-issues-resolved\/\">Please read this updated post<\/a> explaining why I believe you should hold off on making the DSP-2 purchase until software and hardware issues have been resolved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Many thanks to\u00a0SWLing Post\u00a0contributor,\u00a0Dan Robinson, for the following guest post: &nbsp; Test Driving The Russia-Made Malahit DSP-2 Poised on Edge of Greatness?\u00a0 (Some Challenges To Overcome) by Dan Robinson By now, the Malahit SDR is well known in listening hobby circles.\u00a0 We have the made-in-Russia original, and those manufactured in China with various firmware and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[373,8,8752,3194,433,836,3,3196,26,129,43,154,158,304],"tags":[2635,4342,9374,9372,9373,4085,157,4086,4087,4046],"class_list":["post-49653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-am","category-articles","category-field-radio","category-guest-posts","category-mediumwave","category-new-products","category-news","category-portable-radio","category-radios","category-reviews","category-shortwave-radio","category-shortwave-radio-reviews","category-software-defined-radio","category-videos","tag-dan-robinson","tag-guest-posts","tag-malahit","tag-malahit-dsp-2","tag-malahit-dsp-2-review","tag-reviews","tag-sdr","tag-shortwave-radio-reviews","tag-software-defined-radio","tag-wideband-receivers"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pn3uc-cUR","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":50302,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2021\/09\/dan-adds-updates-to-his-malahit-sdr-and-variant-reviews\/","url_meta":{"origin":49653,"position":0},"title":"Dan adds updates to his Malahit SDR and variant reviews","author":"Thomas","date":"September 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to\u00a0SWLing Post\u00a0contributor,\u00a0Dan Robinson, for the following update to his previous post regard the DSP-2 and HFDY Malahit SDRs: Malahit and HFDY Updates by Dan Robinson HFDY CLONE:\u00a0 As noted by a reader in comments, the Chinese-made HFDY leaves out a large portion of the military AIR band, with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/China-Clone.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/China-Clone.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/China-Clone.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/China-Clone.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":49694,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2021\/07\/malahit-dsp-2-review-update-dan-recommends-holding-off-until-issues-resolved\/","url_meta":{"origin":49653,"position":1},"title":"Malahit DSP-2 Review Update: Dan recommends holding off until issues resolved","author":"Thomas","date":"July 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to\u00a0SWLing Post\u00a0contributor,\u00a0Dan Robinson, for the following guest post: UPDATE: Malahit DSP-2 (July 24, 2021) RECOMMENDATION: Hold Off Until Issues Are Resolved I thought it important enough to write this update to my earlier extensive review of the Malahit DSP-2, the second version of the Russia-made receiver. Earlier incremental\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":42776,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2020\/04\/fenu-posts-a-malahit-dsp-afedri-lan-iq-head-to-head-comparison\/","url_meta":{"origin":49653,"position":2},"title":"Fenu posts a Malahit-DSP &#038; Afedri LAN-IQ &#8220;Head to Head&#8221; comparison","author":"Thomas","date":"April 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who shares the following video from Fernando Duarte, comparing the Malahit-DSP and the new Afedri LAN-IQ: https:\/\/youtu.be\/4n12C9qwzVo Click here to view on YouTube.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;New Products&quot;","block_context":{"text":"New Products","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/new-products\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Malahit-DSP-and-Afedri-LAN-IQ.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Malahit-DSP-and-Afedri-LAN-IQ.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Malahit-DSP-and-Afedri-LAN-IQ.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Malahit-DSP-and-Afedri-LAN-IQ.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":50089,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2021\/08\/malahit-dsp-2-dans-thoughts-on-external-antennas-firmware-and-purchase-decisions\/","url_meta":{"origin":49653,"position":3},"title":"Malahit DSP-2: Dan&#8217;s thoughts on external antennas, firmware, and purchase decisions","author":"Thomas","date":"August 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to\u00a0SWLing Post\u00a0contributor,\u00a0Dan Robinson, for the following guest post: Additional Thoughts on the Malahit DSP-2\u00a0 Potential for Noise Reduction Using Non-Whip Antennas Latest Firmware Changes by Dan Robinson After my last update on the Russia-made Malahit DSP-2, I thought it important to add something about the receiver, as it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Guest Posts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Guest Posts","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/guest-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":41940,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2020\/02\/the-malahit-dsp-a-potential-holy-grail-portable-sdr\/","url_meta":{"origin":49653,"position":4},"title":"The Malahit-DSP: A potential Holy Grail portable SDR?","author":"Thomas","date":"February 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who provides this update to his article on the Belka DSP receiver. Dan writes: One of the other DSP radios shown being demonstrated on YouTube is this one by Georgy Yatsuk, presumably from somewhere in Russia. In his comments posted on January\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;New Products&quot;","block_context":{"text":"New Products","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/new-products\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/edelstein-SDR-Feni.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/edelstein-SDR-Feni.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/edelstein-SDR-Feni.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":50013,"url":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/2021\/08\/malahit-dsp-2-review-update-3-dan-evaluates-the-latest-hardware-version\/","url_meta":{"origin":49653,"position":5},"title":"Malahit DSP-2 Review Update 3: Dan evaluates the latest hardware version","author":"Thomas","date":"August 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Many thanks to\u00a0SWLing Post\u00a0contributor,\u00a0Dan Robinson, for the following guest post: UPDATE NO 3: Malahit DSP-2 (August 18, 2021) A few weeks ago, I wrote about my experiences with the Russia-made Malahit DSP-2 receiver, and made a recommendation that potential purchasers of the receiver hold off until the design team in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;New Products&quot;","block_context":{"text":"New Products","link":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/category\/new-products\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Malahit-DSP-2-Teamalahit-1-1.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49653\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swling.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}