SBC pulls the plug on FM radio

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, David Iurescia, who shares the following news item via SwissInfo.ch:

Swiss Broadcasting Corporation pulls plug on FM radio (SwissInfo.ch)

The Swiss Broadcasting Corporation (SBC) switched off outdated analogue FM transmitters at 11:59pm on New Year’s Eve.

Connections to around 850 ultra-shortwave transmitters throughout Switzerland have come to an end.

Anyone wishing to continue listening to the radio stations SRF1, SRF2 Kultur und SRF3 in the new year, for example, will have to switch to the digital radio technology DAB+ or Internet radio. All other SBC programmes were previously only available via the Internet or DAB+.

SBC, SWI swissinfo.ch’s parent company, now only needs around 260 antennas for DAB+ broadcasting.

Around two dozen private radio stations in Switzerland will continue to broadcast via FM and will not discontinue the service until the end of 2026 at the latest. [Continue reading…]

Spread the radio love

7 thoughts on “SBC pulls the plug on FM radio

  1. qwertyamdx

    The results of forced FM shutdown in Switzerland are now visible. Swiss public radio has lost half a million of listeners (over 20% of their overall audience) that flocked to private stations that continue to broadcast in analogue. Google an article “Nach UKW-Aus verlieren SRF-Sender eine halbe Million Zuhörer” on the website tagesanzeiger.ch (Tagesanzeiger is one of the biggest dailies in Switzerland). Absolute disaster for a public service broadcaster. This could have been prevented if the decisionmakers did not believe bollock claims by DAB lobbyists who managed to convince them that no one actually listens to FM.

    Reply
  2. Fabrizio

    n the end, on our analogue radio receivers, only SW will be usable, as everyone is leaving FM, AM and long wave. I was planning to buy a new radio from Tecsun, but in view of what’s happening I’m hesitating.

    Reply
  3. mangosman

    Radio and television fee

    Anyone residing in Switzerland who receives radio and television programmes is obligated to pay licence fees, by virtue of the Federal Act on Radio and Television (RTVA), regardless of which stations they watch or listen to or by which means they do this (antenna, cable, satellite, telephone, mobile, internet).

    The only people exempt from the fees are AHV and IV entitled parties, who are in receipt of benefits according to the Federal Act on Benefits supplementary to the Old Age, Survivors’ and Invalidity Insurance.

    The government determines the figure to be paid in radio and television fees. Serafe AG ist responsible for the collection of the licence fee.

    For the most part, the revenue generated through fees serves to finance SRG’s public service radio and television programmes. 34 private radio and television operators also receive a share to fulfil concessionary services. Some of the revenue is used to promote new technology and audience research. The revenue also covers the costs for spectrum management (Bakom) and the collection of licence fees (Serafe).
    Since 1 January 2019, a new device-independent radio and tv fee is levied on households and companies. For households, the radio and tv contribution is 335 francs a year (since 2021). = USD 368.54
    https://www.srgssr.ch/en/who-we-are/funds/radio-and-tv-fee

    The TV viewers in the UK have to pay a licence fee which funds the BBC. The UK also has commercial TV.

    The USA uses advertising which pays for the broadcasters through the increased prices of goods that consumers buy. Unfortunately there is no direct connection in the consumers’ mind as to how much of that price is being fed to which broadcaster. Pay radio and Audio on Demand have subscription fees. Isn’t that like a licence fee except the company collects the money instead of a Government agency.

    Reply
  4. mangosman

    The USA is not a free market in broadcasting.
    The telcos through the Government forced the transition from the terrible NTSC to ATSC digital TV so they could get the 700 – 800 MHz band. The population was forced to buy new TVs or a set top box. No one wants to go back to NTSC now!
    The telcos also prevented the FM receiver chip in mobile phones from working in the USA where phones elsewhere can receive the broadcast FM signal not using the listeners’ data allowance. Apple owning itunes and iphones prevented FM reception for their own commercial reasons.

    Now there is pressure to make compulsory the 110 year old Amplitude Modulated transmission standard be installed in vehicles. AM has no high frequency audio, its noisy, distorted and has no stereo. It cannot transmit digital signals such as images and text. Even FM stereo is 64 years old.
    Contrast this with Europe which made the reception of the latest digital terrestrial compulsory which has reduced the costs to broadcasters and increases program choice where all programs can be stereo with images and test. The European broadcasters also transmit detailed traffic conditions which modify the navigation system routing. These systems are around 20 years old.

    Broadcast can only get technical improvements when a large proportion of the audience have capable receiving equipment. The manufacturers don’t wish to make improved receivers unless there are programs to listen to. ie. the chicken or the egg!

    Lastly the telcos are releasing a new generation of phone standards every 16 years and switch off their equipment when they have sold enough new phones, forcing the rest of the users to buy a new phone or do without.

    Reply
    1. qwertyamdx

      > Now there is pressure to make compulsory the 110 year old Amplitude Modulated transmission standard be installed in vehicles.
      It’s not about the age of the technology used, it’s about ensuring that the car manufacturers provide access to all stations that are licensed to operate in the US. If you support compulsory DAB+ in European cars, you should also support compulsory AM in American cars.

      > AM has no high frequency audio, its noisy, distorted and has no stereo.
      AM can have high frequency audio, is not noisy (provided the strength of the received signal is sufficient) and can have stereo.

      > Contrast this with Europe which made the reception of the latest digital terrestrial compulsory which has reduced the costs to broadcasters
      I don’t really think that the compulsory inclusion of DAB+ receivers in new cars sold in the EU has lowered the costs for the broadcasters. And we should also mention that “latest” in this case means “2 decades old”.

      > increases program choice where all programs can be stereo with images and test.
      Except they are often… not transmitted in stereo. On top of that, you can hardly find a DAB+ station that transmits with a quality that is comparable to analogue. If we’re talking of Norway, most of the stations are ~80kbps AAC+ which is considerably worse than analogue FM that does not have any digital compression reducing the audio quality.

      > Broadcast can only get technical improvements when a large proportion of the audience have capable receiving equipment.
      It’s precisely the other way around. The technological improvements have to be implemented and commenced before the general public will be able (and will want) to buy new receiving equipment. There’s just not that much of a “technical improvement” in digital radio.

      Reply
  5. mangosman

    In the early 2000s Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand and other countries converted from analog TV to digital TV. This required either the purchase of a new TV or a set top box. The telcos were pushing this conversion because their ultimate aim was the 700 – 800 MHz band. This was possible because every analog TV transmitter had to have an empty adjacent channel on either side of their transmissions to prevent interference. Digital TV did not have this problem. The benefit for the consumers was wide screen high definition images free of ghosted images and in NTSC countries (North America) the correct hue. In addition in DVB-T and DVB-T2 countries, more programs available.
    The winging about throwing out old TVs was virtually non existent.

    Back in 2017 Norway switched off FM for their government and commercial broadcasters only leaving low powered community broadcasters on FM.
    The reason they did this was that the network of government and commercial FM transmitters had reached their economic use by date. The cost of broadcasting is now 1/8th compared to FM. DAB+ increased the number of programs available. Some have proved very popular.
    On one transmitter per coverage area NRK transmit 15 programs and on a commercial transmitter 10 programs. To transmit 25 programs on FM they would have needed 25 transmitters on each transmitter site!
    Current audience ratings https://www.nielsen.com/news-center/2024/pr-new-nielsen-research-shows-norwegian-radio-remains-a-strong-force/

    Since December 2020 all new cars in the European Union must be capable of digital terrestrial radio.
    The power of DAB+ transmission is not limited by any existing radio broadcasts making automotive reception reliable.
    HD Radio is not installed in every new vehicle in North America despite being standardised 24 years ago.

    Swiss broadcaster SRG has 17 programs on their DAB+ transmitters. Remember that Switzerland has German, French and Italian as dominant languages.
    Once all listeners have DAB+ receivers, there will be no demand for FM broadcasts. DAB+ works well where there are multiple reflected signals. FM becomes distorted and the stereo separation is reduced. Switzerland is a mountainous country with many tunnels many of which have leaky cables radiating DAB+ programs. If there is a blockage in the tunnel, these leaky cables will transmit instructions to drivers.

    Reply
  6. qwertyamdx

    Since there’s no other use for 88-108 MHz band than FM broadcasting, there should not be fixed date set for the forced shutdown. By imposing it, the Swiss regulator has acted contrary to the free market competition rules and against the interests of the public. They aligned themselves with the DAB lobbyists who want to establish a monopoly for their own broadcasting standard. But the real action of an actual regulator should be to protect the citizens from the influence of corporate lobbying and do everything possible to foster competition. It should be a decision made individually by each of the stations after own assessment. If someone wants to broadcast in analog, why should the state refrain from issuing a license and collecting the necessary fees? Who benefits from that?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.