NIST FY2019 budget includes request to shutdown WWV, WWVH, and WWVB

WWV Time Code Generator – photo taken at WWV in 2014

Many thanks to a number of SWLing Post readers who have pointed out the NIST 2019 Presidential Budget request which has now been posted online and includes a desired reduction of:

“$6.3 million supporting fundamental measurement dissemination, including the shutdown of NIST radio stations in Colorado and Hawaii

WWV’s transmitter building in Fort Collins, Colorado (2014)

I’ve always considered WWV and WWVH to be the heartbeat of the shortwaves here in North America–a constant, timely companion and brilliant gauge of HF propagation. Indeed, on a personal note, WWV was actually the first station I ever remember hearing on shortwave.

I assumed both stations would be some of the last to go silent on the shortwaves.

No doubt, I find this budget request very disappointing. Let’s hope, somehow, this does not come to fruition. We will certainly post any/all updates here on the SWLing Post. Follow the tag: NIST

UPDATE: I’ve received a number of questions about Fort Collins-based station WWVB and if it would also be included in the closures. As the budget states, it includes: “the shutdown of NIST radio stations in Colorado and Hawaii.” At the budget’s current iteration, this implies all NIST radios stations including WWVB.

I’ve pointed out WWV and WWVH in particular as they’re the shortwave time stations of the NIST. WWVB, on the other hand, provides a continuous 60 kHz carrier wave that, among other things, is used by self-setting “atomic” clocks used by consumers and industry.

I’ve amended the title of this article to reflect WWVB’s inclusion in the budget cuts.

Click here to read about my visit to WWV Fort Collins in 2014.

Spread the radio love

75 thoughts on “NIST FY2019 budget includes request to shutdown WWV, WWVH, and WWVB

  1. K wilsom

    About 5 years ago the Canadian Government was set to shut down All the CHU Shortwave time stations. A big letter wRiting campaign by Radio ,Electronics And Astronomers was enough to get the decision reversed.

    Unfortunatly, there is no Government motive to keep the RF spectrum usable to the public (in my opinion). The lack of RFI enforcement ( SMPS, unfiltered devises etc) and anything that makes the spectrum useless to “free” users is all part of the long range plan to auction off the complete spectrum.

    Only digital encrypted communications will eventually be allowed- want to communicate? You better have a good “ social credit score”, be willing to pay a fee and be prepared to be monitored.

    The communist dream that’s now brainwashed into American youth could become a reality and you’ve seen how an elected President who is still pro-personal freedom and anti-UN Agenda 21 and NWO has almost insurmountable enemies. How will Americans chose to live in the not so distant future?

    Short wave spectrum is just another brick in the “freedom” wall. Communication will be controlled as we are now seeing with internet social media “thought blockades” by the technocracy.

    Reply
  2. Nona

    And THIS ahead of the FEMA-FCC Nation wide Drill, on Sept 20, wherein, they will take over ALL the airwaves!

    THis way, there will be no way to communicate or inform others of any chicanery!

    What are the Elite planning to do Sept. 20? Whatever it is, we wont be able to communicate, even via shortwave.

    Oh, yes, the Feds are up to something!!!

    Reply
  3. Scott

    Well my American friends, stop posting here and start posting to your Senators and Reps email inboxes. This budget amount is microscopic, Trump’s tanning bed costs would be comparable.

    Reply
  4. Bob

    Maybe a solution might be to turn the entire WWV-WWVB Ft.Collins station over to the private sector, I’m certain there would be no end of amateur radio ops who would happily volunteer to operate and maintain the station! I know I would leap at that opportunity, even the grave yard shift!

    Reply
  5. Phil Cornell

    This is just another attack of the science deniers in our government. “If it is science related, kill it.”

    Reply
  6. P.D. Asilomar

    Petition signed.

    Ever hear of “Fallback Measures?” When the Internet falls down and goes BOOM, (and someday it will), we’re going to do some serious wailing over our lost resources. 6 mil? They spent 33 MILLION upgrading Orange Tiberius’s Airplane!

    The GOP and Two Scoops Donnie are driving this country into the ground.

    Reply
  7. Thomas F. Giella

    If they shut down WWVB it will make millions of auto set clocks useless, probably a waste of more than $6 million. Since the advent of atomic clocks so to speak, clocks have become more inaccurate when not syncing with WWVB.

    Reply
    1. Joni Zornes

      I signed, but you left off any specific reference to the stations being a frequency standard, which is more important to me than just the time. Sure we can get the time off the internet, but I don’t know any way, short of installing a GPS 10Mhz reference to calibrate transmitters (like we do in the 2-way radio business), off of a computer or Iphone. For the general public, the frequency calibration from WWV is still an important tool.

      Reply
  8. Richard Cochran

    Some people here seem to be under the impression that WWVB will continue, allowing all those consumer radio controlled clocks to continue keeping time automatically synchronized to the standard.

    But the actual text from the NIST FY2019 budget proposal says:

    NIST will discontinue the dissemination of the U.S. time and frequency via the NIST radio stations in Hawaii and Ft. Collins, CO. These radio stations transmit signals that are used to synchronize consumer electronic products like wall clocks, clock radios, and wristwatches, and may be used in other applications like appliances, cameras, and irrigation controllers.

    Source: http://www.osec.doc.gov/bmi/budget/FY19CBJ/NIST_and_NTIS_FY2019_President's_Budget_for_508_comp.pdf

    It doesn’t mention any call signs, but it doesn’t exclude any, either. It does say it will shut down the broadcasts from Ft. Collins, and that those broadcasts are used to synchronize consumer clocks and wristwatches. To me, those words sure sound like WWVB is in jeopardy, along with WWV and WWVH.

    Reply
    1. Thomas Post author

      Agreed, Richard. I can’t imagine them keeping WWVB yet shutting down WWV. The wording, as I read it, sounded like the entire site would be shut down.

      Reply
  9. William L. Fuqua

    A couple of years ago I designed and built a special receiver to monitor all the WWV stations from 2.5 MHz to 20 MHz to observe ionospheric Doppler shift and propagation. It was easy since they are harmonically related. I got some great data during the eclipse this past year. You could observe the “S” curve in the Doppler shift and the Bow wave was also observed on the higher frequencies as fast ripples in the Doppler shift.
    Sure, a bunch of hams could set up beacons with GPS disciplined oscillators, but there are some rules would have to change to allow that.
    I was working on a receiving system for educational purposes to monitor the space radar fence signals so that we could observe the international space station and other space craft. But as I got started they shut it down.
    As far as frequency and time, GPS still relies on NIST as the standard as they continually produce more and more accurate standards. It looks like they may cut over 12 million having to do with environmental measurements and study to please the White House, I guess.
    It was not that long ago that their researchers produced a new state of matter, that was only theorized for many decades, Bose Einstein Condensate.
    Isolated and poor populations in third world countries, particularly in Central and South America use WWV to synchronize their clocks. HF frequencies are particularly good at penetrating jungle growth and shortwave receivers are very inexpensive, some new only a few dollars.
    This WH is so short sighted.

    Reply
  10. Nigel Holmes

    I meant to say
    * it’s always prudent to have a back-up. Or three. No plan A ever survived WTSHTF. Your Plan B will run home to its mother and not speak to you for 3 weeks. You need Plan C.

    Reply
  11. Nigel Holmes

    Random Observations
    * it’s always prudent to have a back-up.
    * US$6.3 mill would buy you a military toilet, but only the basic titanium tub model recycled from a Warthog.
    * do not underestimate the probability of a Carrington event, we missed one in June 2012 by nine days of solar rotation (read Koppel, Lights Out & replace cyber attack with Carrington event)
    * satellites are susceptible to a range of space weather effects (deep dielectric charging, enhanced orbital retardation) and can be easily shot down (the Big 3 demonstrated this years back, China most recently in 2007).
    * GNSS are pretty tough creatures as they operate in/around the Van Allen Belts at 19-24,000 km asl, but still have major issues e.g. SVN23 http://www.gps.gov/cgsic/meetings/2016/curry.pdf
    * all mobile cell bases have 2ndary references (which is why Rb stds are so cheap)

    HF ST&F tx can be more accurate than you might think. You can make frequency determinations down to 1 hertz in 10 GHz from WWV/WWVH by using the 1 kHz tone as a reference.
    See Burhans, Radio-Electronics 1983 September pp61-62 “Frequency Calibration Using WWV”

    Reply
  12. WA6RIK

    In my view, I believe the intention to shut down WWV and WWVH is ill advised. Even the US military has decided to maintain a HF communications capability. Our space based communication assets are WAY too vulnerable to depend on exclusively so we need a terrestrial based ‘Plan B’ to back them up.

    Reply
  13. Floyd Fox

    This burns me up as much money as the U.S. government gives away to foreign countries and as much as they spend to rebuild countries they’ve blown up! I zero beat WWV on CW = Morse Code to calibrate my transmitter so it is dead on the frequency with the industry standard. Amateur (ham) radio operators use WWV frequently for this purpose, especially when building a homemade transmitter or transceiver and the U.S. government needs to find the funding to keep it going. They never have any problem finding the funding they need to pay for things their respective political parties want to be funded!

    Reply
  14. Nick Gurr

    I think most of you dislike change. I understand this, but unlike most of us old guys my VCR no longer blinks 12 all day. Hams accept change.

    Reply
  15. CapnJb

    WWV should not be eliminated… Basic radio is far more reliable than high tech solutions such as Satellite/GPS/Internet. Ships at sea use high tech (GPS/OMEGA/DECCA/LORAN) navigation systems, some of which have been shutdown in favor of GPS. However, the back up low tech navigation systems require accurate time to navigate using celestial navigation. The only source of accurate time when all else fails is WWV and the ships chronometers. One uh oh… costs far more than $6.3 million. Not a wise proposal…

    Reply
  16. Dana Whitlow

    If what I’ve been reading from time to time is not an exaggeration, a “Carrington event” has the potential to irreversibly incapacitate existing satellites.

    So we should think twice about depending on GPS (etc) to provide backup services.

    Reply
  17. DL4NO

    I understand your nostalgic feelings. But lets face the facts:

    * A shortwave transmission cannot be more exact than a few ms due to ionospheric fluctuations. If you need really exact time, you need to use any of the four navigational sattelite systems like GPS (USA), GLONASS (Russia), Galileo (EU) or the Chinese system I do not know the name. That should be redundancy enough.

    * Small, autonomous devices like wrist watches normally rely on longwave signals – 60 kHz in the US, 77,5 kHz here in Germany. Longwave can be received within buildings, even in most cellars. Remember how long many people are outside where their devices could receive shortwave signals.

    * Propagation tests on shortwave can be done much better and cheaply using the the International Beacon Network, Reverse Beacon Network or WSPR – to name only a few of the Ham Radio systems.

    * In the majority of cases you can use a time server on the Internet.

    Conclusion: Those shortwave time signals are less important than medium-sized shortwave broadcast stations that send information into countries without a free press and censored Internt access like China, North Korea and many others.

    Reply
    1. SteveV

      You know, tovarich, if you’re going to troll the list here, you need to change your name to something less Russian. It’s a fact that untold numbers of timepieces use WWVB to synchronize their oscillators with reality. GPS doesn’t work on wristwatches – especially the sealed, solar-powered types, because the power budget just doesn’t work – GPS is an energy hog compared to a once-per-24 hours reception of the WWVB beacon at 60 kHz. And, to the other writer, no, $10 tcxos don’t solve the problem – they drift, as every oscillator does.

      Reply
      1. Joni Zornes

        Absolutely! TCXO’s need to be calibrated against a standard. Good luck on finding an app for that on your Iphone!

        Reply
  18. Ian Baines, P Eng.

    If we were to have another Carrington event as in 1859, satellite communication would disappear, as would most short wave. Time coordination for utilities, network communication, navigation would fall back on fiber optic cables. If you are not on a cable node, you would need WWV to establish accurate time. Dominoes failure of communications would imperil most modern systems. Without WWV, good luck getting systems running again. It will be a hard lesson

    Reply
  19. Clint Gilliland

    I grew up with WWV. My father worked for the National Bureau of Standards from the 1930s. He was involved with ionospheric research, shortwave propagation, and vertical iono sounders. When I was in high school he ran a field station in Puerto Rico. He usually had a speaker on WWV on all the time. Earlier, when I was very small, I remember when WWV only had a voice announcement on the hour (and half hour?),
    I don’t trust the internet time as latency, mentioned above, is unknown. There are three WWVB clocks in the house.
    I recorded the last leap second adjustment.

    Reply
  20. J Case

    I have to assume most of the comments posted here are based on the fact that fact the posters have never been involved in the budgeting process.
    This is not Trump or Congress shutting down WWV & WWVH this is NIST shutting it down.
    NIST was asked to submit a budget telling Congress how much money they need and where they are going to spend it. If you go to https://www.nist.gov/director/fy-2019-presidential-budget-request-summary/fundamental-measurement-quantum-science-and
    It shows you the line items NIST says it no longer needs and Radio Time Service does not seem to be needed anymore as you can get it from GPS or over the Internet and a $10 OCXO will provide a more accurate frequency reference than WWV or WWVH can.

    Reply
    1. Nigel Holmes

      Dear J Case,

      I have been involved in budget management. Budgets covering every mode of broadcast delivery you can imagine (satellite, MF, VHF, online, HF, transcription, partner re-broadcasts).

      Let’s look at a certain HF site of 610 acres (privately owned) in a rural environment: 7 x 100 kW HF tx, 13 big arrays & associated masts (to 60 m agl). Substantial auxilliary equipment (inc. Rb stds!!), air con., fire protection, multiple MVA trannies & 22 kV switchyard. 6×100 kW run 24/7
      Staff costs $1.2m
      Electricity $1.5m
      O&M $1.1m (Operation & Maintenance)
      Commercial margin $0.9m
      Total $4.7m p.a.

      I’d like to see the breakdown for NISTs costs associated with WWV/WWVH. US$6.3m seems high, but perhaps the sites are maintenance intensive due to aging infrastructure & environmental impacts.

      Reply
  21. John Adkins

    Somehow the railroads got along pretty well before WWV began broadcasting time signals in 1922. The general public has never used the broadcast directly, though I remember the thrill of hearing the metronome the first time when I was about 10. I’m unconvinced that broadcast of a time standard is a required governmental function. Regarding GPS function, for example, companies using or selling GPS products could give support. Those of us with “atomic clocks”–I have 3–will probably just have to go back to correcting the time once weekly, as we used to do.
    On the other hand, it seems that with the amount of waste in the budget, the measly amount in the appropriation seems affordable. Perhaps this could be the first step in some governmental fiscal sanity. Well–probably it won’t.

    Reply
    1. SteveV

      The general public has been using the WWVB signals directly for more than 10 years, perhaps 20 for me – I’m trying to temember how long I’ve had my 1st Lacross Technology watch, which uses WWVB. On addition to the watches, there are untold numbers of wall clocks that “sync” to WWVB, as well as remote weather monitoring stations. So, contrary to some commenters here, there is and has been direct public benefit from NIST’s time and frequency services.

      Reply
  22. William V Jones

    Trump had nothing to do with it. Many shortwave services are going to the wayside. Shortwave is highly inefficient compared to other means of transmission.

    Reply
  23. Scott Todd

    I know it’s not technically the most accurate way to calibrate a frequency counter, but I have one that I zero-beat with WWV on 10MHz. Would hate like crazy to see that go away.

    Reply
  24. Bob LaRose W6ACU

    I think that the hidden agenda is actually to try to stop time from going forward and find a way to turn it back a couple of decades!

    Reply
  25. Tom Reitzel

    Complete craziness. WWV is one of a FEW viable governmental functions. I’m wondering when automatic pay decreases will be implemented by the US Congress so WWV can continue. 😉 Nearly unbelievable.

    Reply
  26. Hue Miller

    The comment that cellphone systems rely on the WWVB LF signal, is that accurate ? I worked in telco central
    offices, where all the timing came from GPS. The modern GPS is very small and inexpensive compared to earlier systems. As for the LF signal timing clocks and so on, it’s near bulletproof, but not totally, depending on local shielding and local noise.

    Reply
  27. Christopher Ness

    Article 1, section 8 of the U. S. Constitution:
    “To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;”

    Yet another Constitutional duty of the U.S. Government being cast off so they can afford to do the unconstitutional duties they have taken on.

    Reply
    1. Richard Weil

      Sure, got to support another few hours of pointless lost wars based on lies. Meanwhile our schools, roads, and bridges, fall apart, medical costs become impossible and soon almost no one will be able to afford college. At bottom is a Congress corrupted by special interests and their money, but destroying good public services like WWV makes no sense. (Dare I say it is things like this that make America “great”?) I think a lot of the problem is that most bureaucrats have no idea what over-the-air radio (let alone shortwave) still does today. And maybe others just don’t care.

      Reply
  28. Nigel Gunn

    J,D, Weisenburger…
    “a time standard unequaled elsewhere in the world”
    Please tell me where your system is superior to the British, German, Russian, Canadian et al systems?

    Reply
  29. Jake Brodsky

    Many things depend on WWVB that most do not even know is in service. For example, if you’re in an underground vault (as with a utility, instead of running a cable to a GPS receiver above, you could purchase a WWVB receiver and it would just work.

    As far as WWV is concerned, I consider it a cheap convenience. It’s a lot nicer than a GPS receiver with a slaved oscillator. Furthermore, GPS is often spoofed and jammed, so having another time source on the air like that is very useful.

    For what it costs to keep this thing going, I think it would be a mistake to kill the program.

    Reply
  30. Dale Putnam - WC7S

    This is arguably the absolute best, most efficient and cost effective spending of Federal Tax monies that we have. The folks that work at WWV are shining examples of selfless pride in their work and their country.
    To end that program is shameful, especially when what is to be paid for with the “saved” money is shown for what it really is. Shameful. Another instance of no one listening to the folks paying the bills.

    Reply
  31. Dale Putnam

    This is arguably the absolute best, most efficient and cost effective spending of Federal Tax monies that we have. The folks that work at WWV are shining examples of selfless pride in their work and their country.
    To end that program is shameful, especially when what is to be paid for with the “saved” money is shown for what it really is. Shameful. Another instance of no one listening to the folks paying the bills.

    Reply
  32. Stan Edwards

    Years ago I used WWV for time and frequency calibration. Most computers now use the Internet for setting its time. As stated earlier, WWVB is used for those “atomic” clock settings and it doesn’t seem to be included in the budget cuts. I now use GPS for setting the clock on my computer. The one thing I would miss from ceasing operations on WWV would be the solar predictions used for radio propagation forecasting when I don’t have Internet access when traveling. I don’t do much radio frequency calibration work anymore, but I’m not sure how that would be accomplished without WWV.

    Reply
  33. TomL

    It is Conspiracy Theory that says GPS depends on WWV and all chaos will ensue (reminds me of Y2K madness when the world was going to end; not so much except that Taiwanese parking meters went offline).

    How GPS gets its time calcs: https://electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/travel/gps3.htm
    Using Differential GPS, I think 8 nanoseconds accuracy is good enough for consumers, hobbyists, and industrial users.

    For computers you can use tick.usno.navy.mil or tock.usno.navy.mil
    Or lookup using NIST’s own time page: https://time.gov

    I would miss WWV/WWVH but it is not the end of the world….

    Reply
  34. John Callari

    Well, it’s the Presidential budget request, so yes, it is the President’s fault that the request is being made.

    Reply
    1. Tom

      We can check CHU in Canada, or Greenwich, or Berlin, or Biejing. Oh, maybe not since they don’t propagate to US (except CHU). How’s that for MAGA?

      Reply
      1. N7MSD

        Scary thing pointed out elsewhere is that they said “the radio stations” (plural) and “that synchronize clocks, watches, [etc]” which implies WWVB is on the block, too!

        However it’s also been pointed out this is probably an example of Washington Monument Syndrome (see the relevant Wikipedia entry) so it’s unlikely anything will actually happen.

        Reply
      2. Gene Katz , KI7KOH

        Should this system be considered part of our national security assets and be kept as a backup communications system in the event of a national communication crises ? It will be the only way to get information out to key resources and part of the ARES system ? It seems very cost effective over any alternative systems we have and their locations strategically sound. They have continue to be upgraded and kept technologically current. Why throw all that away when it does serve such a vital purpose.

        Reply
  35. Mack

    I don’t know who put this proposal in, but WWV and WWVH provide more than just time services essential to so many people and products. These include:

    – Providing a precision frequency reference by which radio receivers and transmitters may calibrate their equipment
    – Marine storm warnings critical especially to smaller craft outside coastal VHF range
    – Solar activity for radio propagation conditions, which is critical to emergency operations using HF

    Of all the things to get rid of, this is not one of them. Someone needs to start a petition to the WH to continue support of WWV and WWVH

    Reply
  36. Mark, MW1MDH

    This is stupid..given how small an amount of money they’re talking, all those clocks and other systems will stop working – But they will need to be converted to GPS/NTP in order to keep working, and that’ll probably cost way more than a paltry $6.3 million!

    Reply
  37. Toby Cobb

    Luke Perry, they use WWVB at 60khz. That being said, many people do use WWV and WWVH for their time and frequency services. For many, this is the closest that the taxpayer can get to a traceable standard for use in time domain measurements

    To terminate these valuable public services would not be in the public interest.

    Reply
  38. Luke Perry

    Don’t a lot of electronics and watches use those signals to sync the precise time? Seems to be a very bad idea to save $6 million a year which is peanuts in the overall budget.

    Reply
  39. J,D, Weisenburger

    WWV and WWVH provide a time standard unequaled elsewhere in the world. Many of us regular citizens have, over the years, invested in automatic clocks that use the time signals of these stations. Our Cellular telephone system syncs to these signals making digital communications possible. The GPS system also relies on a base time reference which is WWV or WWVH. To take away these signals would be paramount to throwing out the standards for weights and measures.

    Although the internet has supplanted, International Broadcasters on the Shortwave bands, the internet cannot replace standard time reference mostly because of IP latency issues.

    Keep the time signals lest chaos will reign again.

    Reply
    1. Tom Adams

      Those automatic “atomic” clocks do use radio signals. Cell systems and GPS require much more precise clocking and do not use WWV, though WWV and Tier 1 clocking use by cell system both trace sources from the same NIST standard. GPS is independent and can itself serve as a high precision distributed clock.

      Reply
    2. Dick Pache

      GPS timing comes from the Navy, There are 2 Naval Master clocks used to control GPS timing, one in Md and the other one at Schriever AFB Colorado, Satellite time transfer is used to compare each clock.

      Reply
    3. Mike

      I don’t really want these stations to go either but their services are dinosaurs. I don’t want to be mean, J.D., but to quote Luke Skywalker, “It’s amazing, but everything you said was exactly wrong.”

      TL;DR read the following: https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/85.pdf This is the 1990 NIST Special Publication 432 which I used to have in actual paper format. Unlike the 2002 version this one still has info on OMEGA, GOES Time Service, and LORAN-C for time. All 3 are now gone and the 2002 version (the current one as I write this) concentrates on GPS and the WWV[H|B] stations as was done after the WWVB upgrade.

      Also there is SP 559 which is old (1979) but still somewhat relevant; here’s a link:

      https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nbsspecialpublication559.pdf

      GPS (and the other satellite systems) are the most accurate time-transfer systems available today. Each bird carries 2 cesium (that’s caesium in the Queen’s English) and 2 rubidium clocks for reliability and those signals are transferred to the ground. When you receive a signal from them you are NOT receiving anything re-transmitted from the ground (though non-time messages like constellation health and the almanac DO come from system controllers). Time-transfer (comparison) between labs like NIST, NPL, BIPM, etc are done by both recording the transmission from the same bird simultaneously; what’s more, this trick can be done even with Selective Availability enabled. I think the newest ones may have fountain clocks aboard…

      GPS and friends give an accuracy of a picosecond (1X10!-12) or better. As transmitted, the signals from the WWV* stations are in the same category, but *AS RECEIVED* they aren’t remotely close, mostly due to noise and ionospheric effects. Unless you’re in ground wave coverage, the best you can get from WWVB is a nanosecond or so (1×10!-9) and on HF you’re lucky to get a millisecond (.001 second). This is for frequency; time code error is worse.

      Bottom line, the stations are sync’d from the labs’ clocks and those clocks are sync’d with other clocks via GPS. Power, phone, etc are all synchronized to GPS, not some HF or LF system. This is why people are finally waking up from shutting down LORAN-C, the only thing that provided synchronization even close.
      As for the other messages (high seas, GPS health, solar) they are all distributed more commonly through other means so this is redundant. Sorry, but true. As I said, WWV[H] is a dinosaur, but for hams and SWL it makes a good beacon. Unfortunately for 99.9999% of people that’s all it’s good for.

      Reply
      1. Save WWV

        As an average consumer, I am more concerned about my radio clocks and wristwatches being obsolete. (There’s many millions of such clocks inside the U.S. today). I don’t want to have to rely only on time.gov for an accurate time reference. For one thing, the Internet is not as reliable as radio (power outages and the like) and, secondly, it is a pain to use it to synchronize clocks.

        And cell phones aren’t reliable either. I can check my phone right now and I will bet it’s several seconds off from NIST’s official time. It might depend on the specific phone and the service provider used, but my phone does not sync time with the provider unless I reboot the phone. And on Android, you cannot sync your phone’s clock with NIST unless you root the phone (no thanks). So, if you want up to the second accurate time on your phone, you have to reboot it. You can’t rely on the GPS receiver of your nearest cell tower. It doesn’t appear to sync with those towers very often.

        As for the accuracy of GPS, the clocks on board those satellites drift by about 10ns per day (even after adjusted for relativistic effects). 10ns doesn’t sound like much, but it’s enough to throw off GPS coordinate calculations by several feet per day if not corrected for. And how do they correct it? By using the UNSO atomic clocks as a master clock reference.

        So what will be the replacement for radio controlled clocks and watches? Any ideas? GPS signals don’t penetrate walls and ceilings.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.