Dan adds updates to his Malahit SDR and variant reviews

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, for the following update to his previous post regard the DSP-2 and HFDY Malahit SDRs:

HFDY clone of the Russian-made Malahit SDR

Malahit and HFDY Updates

by Dan Robinson

HFDY CLONE:  As noted by a reader in comments, the Chinese-made HFDY leaves out a large portion of the military AIR band, with no coverage from 250MHz to 400MHz, or about 150MHz, whereas the Russian-made DSP2 only loses 20MHz from 380MHz to 400MHz.  This may be of concern for some readers, others not.

RUSSIAN DSP-2:  As users of the Russia-made DSP-2 may or may not have noticed, the current firmware shows SIX memory bank pages when there are only 5.  This appears not to have been discussed much on the Malahiteam Telegram group or elsewhere.  In response on this, Georgiy of Malahiteam says this “is normal and for our future features” so clearly there are future plans that we are not aware of.

CHINESE-MADE FIRE BROTHERS CLONE:  On September 21st, I took delivery of another China-manufactured clone, with a heavy metal cabinet, a vertical format with controls on top, and twin front-firing speakers.  Obtained via Alibaba, and branded as “Fire Brothers” this has a thick built-in telescopic antenna and a separate SMA jack which the maker describes as “[supporting] a better external shortwave antenna”

On Alibaba, prospective buyers of this receiver are given two options:  Type 1: 50KHz-2GHz without firmware updates supported, and Type 2 with support for updates.   The unit did arrive with 1.10c Malahit firmware with a 160 kHz bandscope width.

As noted above, this China-manufactured clone also blocks 200 mHz – 400 mHz and shows the Msi001 chip and STM32h743 and a claimed blocking figure of 85dB and  sensitivity up to 250MHz of 0.3?V = 10dB.  The battery is described as 5000 mAh and presumed to be flat type Lithium Ion.

The only thing included with this clone, which arrives in a plain black box marked “Fire Bros.Radio” is a USB-C cable.  That’s in stark contrast with the HFDY clone which comes in a high quality fabric zipper case, flexible whip antenna, USB-C cable, and a small metal stand.

The Fire Brothers manufacturer highlights the “high quality speakers” which not only fire out the front of the receiver, but also wrap around with openings on left and right sides of the radio.  My first tests show that audio is indeed quite nice, certainly equal to the Russia-made DSP-2, possibly an improvement on the HFDY clone which has a single front-firing speaker.

I’ll have more on this Chinese clone and some comparisons with the DSP-2, HFDY, and Afedri SDRs, in future articles here on SWLing Post.

Spread the radio love

2 thoughts on “Dan adds updates to his Malahit SDR and variant reviews

  1. Dan

    I’ve seen several versions of this and came to the following conclusion from club members.

    The beige metal version processor overheats-avoid as some Chinese boards have heatsink on them so must be an issue and build quality issues, have one to try and repair that encoder wires fell off and screen pinched previously – now cpu red hot.
    Weird power issue where green light permanently on.

    Black duel grill version poor assembly design and had to epoxy screen in carefully as hot snot and no support – works ok and returned to club member.

    The dip switches force DFu mode on arm processor at factory or if it won’t enter dfu.
    The HDFY with code you talk of if registered with Russian developer and better shielded-sounds like the one to buy-hopefully i won’t regret it as couldn’t find internal construction pictures.

  2. Barry Felstein

    I bit on one of the HFDY clones on Alibaba. I don’t care about military air, I have plenty of radios that cover it . I had one of the early Chinese clones and it was just a major disaster, all kinds of touch screen issues along with the limited firmware that needed updating, and about the time I finally got it updated, the radio bricked and so far has refused to come back from the dead. This type of receiver is such a great idea, I don’t know why one of the “usual” companies hasn’t made one.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.