The Sangean ATS-909X: Marty’s bedside radio review

Sangean-ATS-909X-Marty

SWLing Post reader, Marty (W5MRM), comments:

I recently picked up a Sangean ATS-909X to use as a bedside radio.

This blog post inspired me to put together a video review of the ATS-909X as a bedside radio. The video review can be found on my youtube page [or via the embedded player below]:

Great video, Marty, and thanks for the thorough review!

You can follow all of Marty’s videos on YouTube by visiting this page.

Spread the radio love

9 thoughts on “The Sangean ATS-909X: Marty’s bedside radio review

  1. Pingback: Recommending the Tecsun PL-880 over the Sangean ATS-909X | The SWLing Post

  2. Dan

    Nice review regarding the 909X as a bedside radio. I’ve had the radio for six months now but haven’t used the timer or alarm functions. I keep another old Sony bedside radio in the bathroom as an alarm clock: which forces me to get out of bed for a shower if I want to turn off the loud radio. I’m very good at turning off bedside alarms in my sleep. Luckily, I don’t sleep walk.

    I use the 909X away from the bedside and do a lot of SWLing with the Sangean ATS-909X, mostly late afternoons and evenings with a 106′ random/long wire antenna.

    You mentioned that the 909X does not have a sync detector for SW. This is a true statement. However, you may like to try using ECR (exalted carrier reception) which is also called ECSS (exalted carrier selectable sideband) with the 909X. This tuning method reduces the effect of fading, noise and blasting on weaker signals rendering the station more readable. I find ECR to work better than sync functions found on portable SW receivers. Tune your SW station using AM and the wide IF filter (6 kHz). Now switch to USB (the 909X will automatically switch to the 4 kHz narrow IF filter for SSB), turn up audio gain a quarter to a third turn, switch to slow tuning and zero beat the station. Voices will sound close to normal when correctly tuned. You may further clarify the signal by using the audio filter settings or switching from USB to LSB and re-tuning to make use of the other side band. You might be amazed at the audio quality and quiet signal the rock solid 909X provides with ECR.

    I’m having fun with the 909X and leaving now to listen to BBC in English via the relay at Ascension Island. It’s coming in great here in California at 7445 kHz from 0500-0600 UTC.

    Reply
  3. Chris Freitas

    Good analysis, Marty! I use a Sangean WR-22 receiver as my bedside radio. It doesn’t have shortwave and nowhere as portable as the ATS 909X, but it does have a ton of features.

    In addition to AM and FM RDS reception, there is aux audio (like the 909X) and Bluetooth. You have a smartphone, tablet, or similar devices, you can stream content from a variety of apps.

    I primarily use it to hear podcasts and stations streaming on TuneIn Radio and other apps as I go to bed. Audio quality is superb as well.

    Reply
  4. Steve

    Thanks for the great review Marty.

    I have had my eye on the Sangean ATS-909x for a while but there are too many reviews claiming the radio is deaf using the whip. I’ve considered buying a modified ATS-909x from Radiolabs (ClearMod) but at $289.95 I have to think twice given I have several radios already. I would be interested if you have the time in your thoughts on sensitivity between the Sangean ATS-909x and the Tecsun PL-880. Have you noticed any sensitivity issues using the Sangean ATS-909x?

    Reply
    1. Direwolf131

      I’m a few years after Steve’s comments but I will have a go at it, at least anecdotally speaking. I’ve owned a half dozen Sangean ATS-909’s, which includes two of the 909X’s, and one super-909 from radiolabs. The 909X is the finest looking portable I have ever seen or lain hands upon, and that includes several Sony’s that I still think of as neat looking, I had the white cabinet 909X first and then the much more striking(to my eyes)black cabinet 909X after returning the first one due to rock hard buttons. They are both extremely attractive, and exceptionally well made, especially by today’s cheap Chinese standards. I must confess that I also still find the original 909’s almost equally neat looking, though not quite sporting the same robustness of build.

      The 909x’s sound wonderful on MW & FM, and its a decent performer reaching out to fairly distant FM stations. Unfortunately that is largely the best of the radio, its performance on MW & SW is best described as pathetic, and not just due to being deaf, it has a lot of noise, even when attached to the superb RF systems tuned EMF antenna. The older 909 is also to my experience substantially better then the 909X when matched up to a serious outboard antenna, such as the above EMF, I found this difference especially surprising, its not even close.

      The PL-880 from Tecsun blows it away on SW and MW sensitivity, while also offering the superb advantage of genuinely ECSS tuning anything on MW & SW, you cannot decently receive any MW or SW signal via ECSS with the 909X as its SSB can only be fine tuned to 40 hz, which is terribly disappointing, you can zero beat the little Tecsun easily. serious ECSS capability is to my mind a much more attractive option then a sync circuit, and unfortunately with the beautiful little Sangean 909X you get neither.

      I do hope anyone who happens upon this pays attention, because for the money the PL-880 is far and away the better performer, in fact my little 1103 from Degen/Kaito out performs the 909X, as does my Grundig Yacht Boy-400, and my Sangean ATS-803A. Its my great hope that Sangean seriously upgrades these deficiencies in the otherwise gorgeous 909X, its circuitry is noisier than the old 909 and its not nearly not as sterling a performer hooked up to household current and a decent outboard antenna as the old 909, its 40 hz tuning SSB once a great reason to buy a 909, is no longer competitive, especially against the superb PL-880 which again is capable of excellent ECSS even by Icom R75 standards, Sangean would do well to drastically improve the SSB performance of the 909X.

      I hope this helps, I liked the original review up top, but again its several years old, and the 909X is now known to be clearly outclassed by the more affordable Tecsun, actually by the PL-660 to boot, I really hope Sangean addresses the issues, its such a beautiful receiver, you just want it to be as good as it looks, unfortunately its not.!

      Reply
  5. Marty

    Hello Moshe,

    The sleep timer can definitely be changed on the ATS-909X. It can be changed in 10 minute increments from 90 minutes down to 10 minutes. The issue I mentioned is that the setting isn’t “sticky.” For instance on the Tecsun PL-660 radio once you set the sleep timer to 30 minutes the radio will only stay on for 30 minutes each time you turn it on until you turn off the sleep timer. On the ATS-909X you have to reset the sleep timer to your desired time each time you want to use the sleep timer.

    Reply
    1. Moshe Ze'ev Zaharia

      Hi Marty,
      Correct on this one.
      I don’t go on vacations so often, so it was no big deal for me. beside this, the Sangean serves me very well, and I find it to be very comfortable to use outdoor.
      Take Care and enjoy your radio.
      Moshe.

      Reply
  6. Moshe Ze'ev Zaharia

    Very interesting review.
    I use the ATS909 on vacations, as a radio alarm (and for SWLing on the balcony of the hotel room…).
    The sleep timer can be change (as long as it flashes) with the tuning wheel or buttons, down to 10 minutes. I think that the 909X version should be the same.

    Best Regards,
    Moshe.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.