A detailed review of the Tecsun S-8800 and comparison with the Tecsun PL-660 & XHDATA D-808

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, 13dka, for the following guest post:

Tecsun S-8800 Review

by 13dka

Looking for a new toy again I recently revisited the Tecsun S-8800, which looked like it could replace both my battered old Grundig Satellit and my Tecsun PL-660.  Being in production for a few years now, and with the “birdies” situation ironed out long ago, the S-8800 has gathered much acclaim by now but also a few somewhat contradicting reviews.  For example, one review reports that the S-8800 can cope with larger antennas, another one states the exact opposite, one praises the MW performance, another one attests only average sensitivity, and only one mentioned an unpleasant detail I’m going to emphasize on in a bit.

All reviews touted the improved SW performance in AM and SSB though, and that was reason enough to make my own experiences.  Testing it turned out to be a bit of an emotional rollercoaster though.

I hope I can share more than only redundant bits of information about the radio, and I’ll skip most of the general information you can read in most other reviews.

Off to the 13dka radio test site at the dike!

13dka’s SWL Happy Place


Like the technically somewhat similar Tecsun PL-880, the S-8800 is a triple conversion receiver and has 2 conventional IF stages, the third IF stage is using a Si4735 DSP chip again, providing the  filters and all that jazz.

Tecsun seems to have thrown a lot more parts into it than in previous radios, plus a pretty big ferrite rod (covering 8-9/10th of the radio’s width) with individual LW and MW coils (most of the smaller receivers have only one coil), a 108mm telescopic whip and of course the “gun metal” knobs.  Designing a radio with a rather simple front panel and making a remote control an integral part of the operation concept (like it is reality with TVs for a long time) is a charming oddball approach, in a way reviving an utmost luxurious feature of 1930s high-end radios.  So let’s cut to the chase and talk performance:

Longwave and Mediumwave

On LW and MW, I first compared the S-8800 with my old Grundig Satellit 400 at home.  The old clunker has similar dimensions, a big old speaker bass/treble controls and it was known to have an average sensitivity on the AMBC band in its time, when all the great, now vintage AM performers were still ubiquitous, so that’s rather a “Jay Allen average” than an “average of the mediocre AM radios of this millenium”.  I think Jay Allen might rate it 3 stars.


The first station I tuned in was the BBC LW transmitter network on 198kHz and it turned out a tad more noisy on the Satellit.  Great!  I could also pick up Medi1 and Kalundborg a smidge better than on the Grundig, and in the early evening, out at the beach I was picking up stations on all still populated channels on LW (minus 180kHz where it has one of the remaining birdies).  The other new portables I currently own (PL-660, D-808) are far away (PL-660) and far, far, far away (D-808) from that kind of performance.


Unfortunately that good impression vanishes gradually when leaving the long wave for the NDB band (still good) and finally medium wave.  Before I left the house to test the radios on the electrically quiet beach again, I was checking out one of my favorite border case stations (low power station from The Netherlands on 1602kHz, whatever their name is this week) and that made very clear already that the S-8800 can’t hold a candle to the Satellit, at least not on the top end of the MW band.  Despite all the noise indoors, on the Satellit I could easily recognize the song being played while the S-8800 didn’t pick up anything at all.

On the beach it turned out that – despite the ferrite rod being twice the size – I find it only marginally better than the PL-660, and not close enough to the little XHDATA D-808 (if you’ve read my D-808 review you already know that this little radio is almost on par with the Grundig on MW):

Timeline: 0:00: D-808 0:07: S-8800 0:11: D-808

Click here to download audio.

Of course I have read Thomas’ assessment of the AM performance so I was prepared to be underwhelmed.  But at least you can connect some high gain MW antenna to make up for the missing sensitivity and be happy again, or can you?

A not so nice surprise

The unpleasant detail I mentioned before is:  the Int/Ext Antenna switch does not turn off the internal ferrite bar antenna.  Jay Allen mentioned it in his review, it was the only review with that detail and unfortunately I overlooked it.  How does that matter?

The main issue is this: if you’re (like me) forced to use outdoor antennas to escape high indoor noise levels, the internal loopstick just won’t let you.  The external antenna will just increase the SNR a bit when the station is strong enough anyway.  Even in a low noise environment, the internal loopstick will needlessly add noise to the signal received from a high-performance active loop or FSL antenna.

That also explains a paragraph in Thomas’ S-8800 review:

“I also hooked up the S-8800 to my large horizontal loop antenna. This certainly did improve MW reception, but not as dramatically as I hoped. Additionally, it seemed to be very sensitive to RFI in my shack even when hooked up to the external antenna.”

There’s more external antenna idiosyncrasy:  only the BNC jack is wired to the “Ext” position of the antenna switch,  the “hot” (red) Hi-Z terminal is active when the switch is in the “Int”-position, it just seems to save you an alligator clip on the whip.

The dedicated “AM antenna” terminal was in part what sold the S-8800 to me.  The label made me assume this would be specifically wired to the AM circuit but as it turns out it’s just a generic high impedance input and I really didn’t anticipate that the internal loopstick remains always active (or in case of the Hi-Z terminals, the retracted whip).  Yes, technically you can connect an external antenna for MW, practically…YMMV.

To conclude this section, the final outcome of this antenna connector issue plus the not so brilliant MW sensitivity was that not even my active ML-200 loop (connected to the BNC-jack) could improve reception on 1602kHz enough to make the S-8800 get at least a bit into the ballpark of the Grundig with its loopstick antenna.  The currently mounted small 80cm rigid loop on the ML-200 just couldn’t produce enough signal to lift the station over the noise that much.

Shortwave SSB

As the other reviews reported already, Tecsun has obviously worked on the AGC issues their former products had.  I can confirm this so far, the AGC does not show the distorted onset of leveling anymore – unless the signal is very strong.  But the leveling happens much faster than e.g. on the PL-880 so the remaining blasts of distortion are quite short:

Click here to download audio.

A more relaxed AGC release time would save us most of those too.  I noticed AGC pumping effects from strong signals in the spectrum neighborhood only with a big antenna connected.  But unfortunately there is more…

Stuff you have to live with:

In his great review, Thomas mentioned the auto mute sometimes interfering with reception. I noticed this too (with all bandwidths on SSB) and I credited this to very low noise figures. When the bandwidth is narrow (=less noise) or if you have a very low noise floor anyway like when tuning through 25-30MHz, the receiver gets muted over the entire chunk of spectrum, just to intermittently and pretty suddenly pass the noise again.  Sounds like a broken antenna cable and has some potential to confuse people:

Click here to download audio.

Then I made some experiments with ECSS, destroying my “noise floor” theory.  It doesn’t always happen but under circumstances that may sound like this:

Click here to download audio.

Too bad that setting auto mute to ’00’ doesn’t actually turn it off in SSB mode so there’s likely no remedy for that.

On my example, there is absolutely no difference between the 3kHz and 4kHz SSB filters.  A working 4kHz filter would have been a good choice for ECSS reception.

Another remaining quirk at least on my specimen of the S-8800 is a slight FM modulation of an oscillator in SSB, particularly with strong signals.  You can hear it best if you create a heterodyne or listen to CW, the tone sounds a bit hoarse, so do voices and I’m not sure whether or not this could affect narrow-bandwidth digimiode decoding.  The front panel (namely the bandwidth knob area) is quite susceptible for “hand capacity”, the frequency varies a bit when you move your hand in front of the S-8800.  This is not uncommon with portables of course, but my D-808 for example has its “Theremin playing area” on the back of the radio.

In this clip you can hear both the “hoarse” modulation and my hand waving  to you.

This leads me to calibration and frequency drift.  The S-8800 can be calibrated on SSB (see the “Hidden features” section below), however this turned out to be a (too) fast moving target.  I don’t know if it’s the VFO or the BFO but it is so temperature-dependent that 6°C temperature difference equates to a quite substantial (for SSB) drift of 150Hz.  Whatever oscillator it is, it seems to lack any temperature compensation measures, with all the implications that may have on relaxed SSB listening, digimode decoding and ECSS reception when the temperature isn’t quite stable where you want to use it.  After calibrating it, it’s often slightly off again within the same minute.  My cheap little D-808 won’t drift even when I take it from an overheated apartment into a -5°C cold winter storm.

The good stuff

Now to the fun part!  When I compared the SSB performance of the S-8800 with my PL-660 the first time, I found them very close for some reason.  I could find only one weak station that came in noticeably better on the S-8800 and while I was happy that it wasn’t worse than the PL-660 I was also a bit disappointed.

Timeline: 0:00: PL-660, 0:10: S-8800 receiving the “Gander Radio” VOLMET.

Click here to download audio.

Then I repeated the test a few days later, this time a bit more into the evening and the outcome was very, very different.  The S-8800 won every single weak signal comparison with ease and sometimes in a way that made me think my PL-660 must be broken.

But then I could help the PL getting a lot closer by simply holding it in my hand, the difference was that I had placed the PL-660 differently so I could record both radios easier.  The factor I forgot to put in the equation was that the S-8800 is absolutely not depending on anyone holding it to give it some counterpoise – that and the long whip is certainly a part of its advantage, and the receivers would be much closer when used with the same external antenna.  With the radios just standing there tho (and that’s what most people will do with their radio instead of holding it in their hand), the difference is remarkable nonetheless and I also learned that you should always look and listen twice when testing radios!

Timeline: 0:00 D-808, 0:03: S-8800, 0:08: D-808, 0:10: S-8800

Click here to download audio.

Timeline: 0:00: PL-660, 0:05: S-8800, 0:10: PL-660, 0:16: S-8800

Click here to download audio.

When I repeated the test yet again but granted the PL-660/D-808 the litte bit of counterpoise they seem to need (I let them rest on the car door instead of holding them), the results were not that unequivocal anymore.  However, the receivers were 50% on par, the S-8800 was clearly better the other 50% and overall the other two receivers could not score a single point for them.  I think that shows that the S-8800 really is a hair or three better.  Beyond the increased sensitivity and minus the frequency drift, SSB reception feels more mature, the the S-8800 behaves more like a regular communications receiver now and the big speaker is a big plus.  Of course that means there should be also an improved reception of…

Shortwave Broadcasts

I know that the S-8800 has inherited the “Enjoy broadcasting” and “BCL RECEIVER” lettering from the cheap S350, but after stepping the PL-660 and the S-8800 through all shortwave broadcast bands, I felt that’s exactly hat it was made for, and it shows!

There is no doubt that a big speaker can create the illusion of better reception, but I think I don’t fall for that easily and rather listen to the background noise and how intelligible the “content” is.  While the comparison with the PL-660 often ended up in a tie when I subtracted the impact of the speaker in my mind, there were indeed some stations where the S-8800 had remarkably less noise than the PL-660.  But of course the big speaker is giving the S-8800 a permanent edge on all reception cases, and it’s a real joy to listen!  Combined with lower noise and a generally more stable signal (through better AGC) this made quite a difference between the two.

Bottom line is that when listening to shortwave broadcasts, the S-8800 gives you the warm and lush sound of yesterday’s famous receivers while it technically delivers the best performance of all Tecsun portables so far.  If you fancy music programs on shortwave and if you don’t mind the price for the luxury and performance, you’ll enjoy this radio a lot.


Short story: my specimen of the S-8800 lacks the very good FM band sensitivity of the PL-660 or the XHDATA D-808.  While the latter radios present my favorite marginal case station 100km away  fairly with some noise at sea level, the S-8800 just doesn’t receive that station at all, no matter how I position the whip.  It’s not exactly worlds between them but considering that (assumedly) most of the FM receiver is in the Si4735 chip that it shares with a couple of great FM performers from the same company, this is a bit surprising.

Signal handling capabilities

The S-8800 is said to have a pretty robust frontend, which I found true but I want to put that a bit into relation.  My “lonely beach/dike listening post” sports 2 abandoned steel flag poles of 6 and 8m height.  They can serve as support for wire antennas, or easily be used as an antenna themselves by inductively coupling them to the receiver – IOW by winding a wire 2-4 times around the pole (you could use the Eiffel tower as an antenna this way) and connecting the other end to the radio.

For some reason this contraption produces quite massive output voltages, but I could always use it for a quick and thorough (and due to the location QRM-free!) reception improvement with my PL-660 anyway.  Why?

The PL-660/880 have a 3-position (DX, Normal, Local) switch. I think it turns off the input preamp in the “Normal” postion and adds a simple attenuator circuit in the “Local” setting.  The latter is sufficient to tame the output of all sorts of antennas (including the flag pole) enough to make my PL-660 work just fine with that on all bands.

The S-8800’s sensitivity switch on the other hand has only 2 positions and telling from the results it really only turns off the preamp.  Now it actually acts up much less on the flag pole than the PL-660 in its comparable “DX” and “Normal” positions, so obviously Tecsun has put some effort into making the frontend more robust indeed.  But it seems they thought “that should do, let’s ditch the 3rd (attenuator) position and save 3 resistors” and that left me with many (but tolerable) images across the entire shortwave above 3 MHz, and a heavily image-infested 160m band.  BTW, a few soft images from (I guess) 49/41m blowtorches could be heard around 29MHz with only the whip.

A word on the audio

I believe that the “legendary” status of the Grundig and Zenith lines of world band receivers is partly owed to their big sound.  They had their music loving and program listening audience in mind, and Tecsun’s choice of casing, big speaker, the bass and treble controls are certainly taking the same line.

Compared to my Satellit 400 (80s model, but still has much of that “legendary” sound), the Tecsun sounds a bit more boomy in the lower mids while having a less super-deep bass response than the Grundig, which also sounds more neutral.  Besides these very unimportant distinctions, the S-8800 does sound big and that also helps reception – lacking low mid/bass content can impair intelligibility as well, and it causes more fatique on long DXing sessions.

The bass/treble shelving EQ is certainly more sophisticated than the Grundig’s, it has quite sharp cutoffs at very sensibly chosen frequencies, so turning the knobs down will leave the main chunk of the mid range completely unaffected and just helps removing rumble or the 5kHz beat frequency from a band neighbor, or add some nice hifi-highs and beefy low end when you turn them all the way up.  In other words you can continuously blend the speaker sound from perfect “voice communications” style to “dad’s big old radio”.

Hidden functions

Of course the S-8800 has some unofficial “power off” and “power on” extra functions assigned to the number keypad on the remote (they all work by pressing and holding a number key for up to 10 seconds).  Some are identical to the PL-880, some are different:

0.) I found calibrating the S-8800 on SSB works with the same method used on the PL-880:  Tune to a station with a known frequency, switch to USB or LSB and use the fine tuning knob to tune for best audio/music playback. An alternative way of doing this is downloading a free spectrum analyzer app for your smartphone (“SpecScope”), tuning the radio 1kHz off frequency so you get a nice heterodyne tone on USB or LSB, then using the fine tuning knob to tune the tone to hit exactly the 1kHz mark on the analyzer display.  Your last 2 (Hz) frequency digits will now show an offset frequency.

1.) Then press and hold the ‘0’ button until a ’00’ appears in the top right corner of the display and the last 2 digits of the frequency readout start flashing.  Release the button and quickly use the fine tuning knob to reset the last frequency digits to ’00’ (the number on the top right corner should be changing while doing that), then immediately hold the ‘0’ key again to confirm – tadaa, the offset should be gone while the last 2 frequency digits show ’00’ now.  This all needs to happen pretty quickly and with the right timing, so it may take a few attempts to get it right.

2.) With the radio off, button ‘2’ turns the LW band on/off.

3.) Press and hold the ‘3’ button while the radio is off to toggle between permanent and “intelligent” display illumination.

4.) When the radio is turned on, this button enables access to the extra functions of the number 6 and number 9 keys.  The display will read “On” when you perform this the first time, doing it again will turn it off again.

5.) Radio on, set to FM band: this toggles between 75 (US) and 50 (anywhere else) microseconds deemphasis on FM.

6.) Radio on: When enabled using the ‘4’-button as described before, holding the ‘6’ will toggle the (annoying) dynamic bandwidth feature off and on.  You can set this independently for AM and SSB.  Ideally to zero, because it automatically resets your bandwidth setting and since this is happening in steps, it sounds quite strange.  The PL-660 uses a stepless dynamic envelope following low pass filter (which is I believe what they called “DNR).

7.) This is still a mystery to me.  On the PL-880, this button apparently controls the line out level on FM.  On the S-8800 it (ostensibly) seems to control the S-meter bias with numbers running from ’00’ to ‘+99’ and ‘-99′ for all bands.  Positive values reduces the S-meter display which made me curious if it rather controls AGC level or gain at some stage, but it really seems to affect the S-meter display only.

8.) Radio off: Toggles the seconds display on the main clock (when the clock is displayed instead of frequency).

9.) Another important one: this controls the threshold of auto squelch/soft mute.  If you want to turn that off, turn it down to ’00’ with the main tuning knob, then hit the ‘9’ key again.  You need to do this for AM, FM and SSB separately.

Random stuff

  • The S-meter was indicating a permanent base level of 2 bars even at my remote beach listening post.  But even though it can apparently be “calibrated”, a 5-bar indicator is quite a step backwards from the 99-step RSSI meter of the PL-880.
  • After an initial discharge and recharge cycle, the 2x2000mAh “18650” batteries gave me a continuous runtime of 21 hours.  When you connect the charger and then turn on the radio, it stops charging unless – and this seems odd – you are in FM mode.  A full charge while listening to FM radio took 4:41.


I had a pretty hard time making my mind up about this radio.  It has so elaborate details, so much design improvement and costly parts went into it but I feel like it doesn’t quite meet the expectations Tecsun created with this radio.   Sadly, it has a few things that were started ambitious and ended underwhelming.

It got a huge 2-coil loopstick and somehow they managed to make it perform slightly worse than a 70€-radio with not even half of that loopstick size, they gave it 2 external antenna ports but they disappoint MW enthusiasts right again by keeping the loopstick always active, and how FM could turn out less sensitive than many radios with the same Silicon Labs chip (including their own models) is beyond me.

They improved the front end but then they dropped the attenuator, which costs the overall flexibility and better overloading-resilience their other radios have, they fixed the SSB issues of the predecessors and introduced a free-floating BFO with a mind of its own.

The price tag is making these downers certainly weigh heavier, and I think without them this radio may have turned out to be a real classic.

On the plus side I found a radio that really excels on shortwave. Shortwave program listeners can feast on a most sensitive, selective, luxurious and well-behaved portable with a big sound and I think there’s probably no current portable that could compete with that.

Ham radio aficionados get improved SSB reception and if there wouldn’t be this “cheap 70s receiver trademark” unstable oscillator, it would come close to communications receiver performance levels (minus the frontend needed for big antenna voltages).

That the price reaches into the ballpark of pre-loved high-end(-ish) JRC/Icom/Yaesu communication receivers or buys you a mint-condition ICF-2010/2001D may seem like a problem too.  But then again, none of those radios is perfect either, and only the Sony is a portable.

Despite the quirks, the S-8800 is still a great, valuable radio that revives an out-of-fashion style of radios in a pretty unique and modern way.

What a brilliant, critical review of the Tecsun S-8800!  Thank you so much for taking the time to properly test and compare the S-8800 with the venerable PL-660 and the XHDATA D-808 (readers, also check out his review of the D-808).

You’re right, too, in that I’ve noticed some contradictions in reviews–I do wonder if part of this might be variations between US and EU versions of the radio, or perhaps small quirks in production runs.

No doubt, however, that the Tecsun S-8800 is a champion of the shortwave broadcast bands and its audio fidelity is in a class of its own.

Click here to view the Tecsun S-8800 at Anon-Co or here to search eBay.

Do you enjoy the SWLing Post?

Consider supporting us via Patreon or our Coffee Fund! Thank you!

Spread the radio love

25 thoughts on “A detailed review of the Tecsun S-8800 and comparison with the Tecsun PL-660 & XHDATA D-808

  1. 13dka

    An update on the update: As of today, ~5 years after purchase my S-8800 has died. FM is still working but it ceased reception completely on all other bands. Between its last usage months ago and today it was merely sitting on the shelf and died of either boredom or planned obsolescence. R.I.P.

  2. 13dka

    A little update after 3 years:

    – The radio hasn’t seen much action in these years, yet every pot and the switches on the side are scratchy and crackling and working them doesn’t really improve the situation, so maybe it’s not just some contact corrosion causing this. Needless to say that the radio lives in my dry, warm and nicotine-free shack, so there should be no external reason for this.

    – The fine tuning encoder wasn’t an example of precision in the beginning but meanwhile it’s rather jumpy and erratic.

    – After a few months of very occasional usage the VFO knob seized up completely for the first time, it seems the lubricant they used is subject to severe resinification as several reports about this indicate. A drop of Krytox -based ultra-low viscosity oil on the shaft fixed that for a while. but now it needs another one.

    – Doing some tests for a review I noticed that the strange quirk with trying to mute the audio (depending on bandwidth and mode), despite soft-/automute is being turned off in the “hidden” settings had become worse. Unless stations are strong or the noise level high, LSB reception is now broken.

    In other words, after 3 years and a total of maybe 30 hours of usage, the radio is in need of deoxit, repair and possibly alignment. Of course these radios are not made to last forever but this pace of decomposition is rather disappointing, particularly when considering the price tag and all the much cheaper and older radios left and right on the shelf not having such issues.

    1. Chris

      I’m pleased I came upon this review because I was gonna buy the S8800 with remote, but you have illustrated the same exact serious issues with this, as I have encountered with H501x radio, specifically the awful SSB calibration issues, along with really under-whelming sound from dual speaker set, also to include the worst battery drain I have ever seen in any radio in my life, where 18650’s are drained to empty in just a few hours time. I also observed the strange lack of symmetry in the reviews from various sources, all which failed to alert to a single one of the serious issues I have seen in three different samples of the H501x.

      I will not be anteing up the $258.00 for the S8800……

  3. J Chappelear

    Hello, you found something here with the #7 key that I have found nowhere else on the entire web & even though you ( nor could I ) find any other thing that it does beside ” calibrate the S-Meter ” . I am quite certian that this would be of interest to all whom Own the s8000 with an always maxed out s-meter ( as mine was ) & I never could understand why, So Thank You for the Fix.

  4. Balazs Benko

    Great review 🙂
    “the Int/Ext Antenna switch does not turn off the internal ferrite bar antenna.”
    Has been any solution founded for this issue ?
    Best regards, Balazs

    1. 13dka

      Thanks! Alas I couldn’t find any hardware mods for the S-8800 so far. Maybe there are some but unfortunately some of the forums where you might find those decided to opt out on being crawled by search engines.

    2. Richard

      I have an S-8800 and got around the issue pby connecting my 144’ long wire antenna to an external, passive AM loop antenna (the kind you would typically see on quality audio receivers,) and placing the loop to rest at the back of the receiver. The loop passes the signal onto the internal ferrite bar antenna through inductance. It made an unbelievable difference in reception: from just hissing and noise, to clear signal. I live in Connecticut, and am pulling in stations from hundred’s of miles away: Hamilton Ontario, Cleveland, Pittsburg and Atlanta.

      You can buy a loop antenna at Amazon for under $10. Mine had two leads. Connect one to the antenna and the other to your RF ground. Please note it can’t be any loop; it has to be tuned to the AM band.

      Finally, the arrangement is so powerful in picking up signals that sometimes, we can hear other distant stations (co-channels) in the background. I connected 3, 6 and 10 DB attenuators to a rotary switch to include a 0 DB bypass, which usually removes the interfering weaker station without severely limiting the signal strength of the desired channel.

  5. Mark

    After more use I discovered that while connecting a random wire to the so called AM input didn’t make a bid difference , connecting my external Bonito MA305 to the “SW/FM” input certainly did, a big difference.

    It still leaves the internal Ferrite connected and rotating the radio can also improve performance.

    This truly made a huge difference to MW/LW.

    I didn’t try connect the Bonito to the AM input, there’s no need.

    I did detect some overloading on LW and on 160/80 meter ham bands. The Bonito is a wee bit hot but I’m not sure I noticed this on the PL-660 , It is only noticeable at night but I need to compare it a little more to the 660.

  6. Mark

    I haven’t had much time to listen but so far but got some time earlier today, the S-8800 is pulling in signals clearer that are not legible or audible at all on the PL-660 with Telescopic Antenna.

    On 20 Meter ham the S-8800 wins hands down over the PL-660, I could hear A guy here in Ireland from New York that I could hardly hear on the PL-660 never mind actually know what he was saying.

    On 40 Meters the S-8800 wins again but this time not by a lot to be honest but I could still copy some stations clearer on the 8800. I have not had much time to compare 160 and 80 meters.

    I would say SSB on the 8800 is a little bit noisier than the PL-660 but that could be that the 8800 sound on SSB is slightly harsher on the ears, the 660 audio on SSB seems quieter but this could be due to the wider filter but I’m still able to copy signals better to a lot better on the 8800.

    SW is the same, the S8800 pulls in signals better to a lot better than the 660, on SW that harshness in the audio isn’t there and it’s very pleasant to listen to.

    The filters definitely help the S8800 and this is apparent when there’s another Ham close by or another station on SW which greatly helps compared to the 660.

    I wish SSB had a wider filter on SSB on the 8800 because 3 Khz is the max, as with the S8800 there is 0 difference between 3 and 4 khz filters on SSB.

    On LW and MW the S-8800 absolutely trashes the PL-660 even the PL-880 leaves the 660 in the dust on LW/MW.

    Next to compare to the PL-880 and S-2000.

  7. Mark

    I actually got to play with it for a little while before I went to work.

    I like it a lot, SSB is better than the PL-880 , none of the distortion though on my 880 it was slight but I can see where it would bother some people. SSB is actually way better than on the S-8800 due to the lower noise better sound and also SSB frequency is way off on the D-808 and tuning it in on the BFO is a pain.

    I only got time to compare it to the XHData D-808 and yes indeed it pulls in weak signals a lot better and the S-8800 is a good bit quieter.

    SW again wins on the S-8800 V D-808, the S-8800 is quieter and pulls in signals I could not hear on the D-808 which is the same on SSB. But have not had time to see if it had the same AGC issues.

    MW/LW are actually pretty good , I can clearly hear some U.K stations on MW and 198 Khz BBC R4 LW. I did not do a direct comparison to the D-808 on MW.

    Indeed the antenna switch does not eliminate the internal ferrite but I found connecting a random long wire does help improve MW/LW, the S-2000 has an MW/LW external antenna input which I must compare to.

    I found FM to be very good, I could hear BBC R 4 and BBC R 1 on 98.8 intermittently here in Ireland probably from wales which I could also hear on the D-808 but it was noisier.

    I noticed some Birdies outside the broadcast bands but have not spent nearly enough time with it yet to know if there are many in places they shouldn’t.

    Ergonomics are very good, it’s a joy to use this radio and the remote will be very useful because it will allow me to use the radio when my two sons are around, they are 2.5 and 4 and they always want to whip my radios out of my hand 🙂 so yeah, remote will be very useful for me, when they’re bored of me and want to play on their own I can whip out the remote and still tune around with the radio up high on the shelf and not fear them running into the room messing with ( breaking ) the radio, nice one Tecsun ! 🙂

  8. Mark

    HI 13dka, and thanks a lot, yes I hope I do enjoy it , it should arrive today sometime while I’m asleep before night shift ( typical ) but anyway , I hope to test it out a bit in the morning when I get home.

    I am quite lucky here at my QTH , it’s a pretty electrically quiet area apart from some intermittent noise from an electric pole.

    I’ll share my first impressions of it sometime tomorrow.



    1. 13dka

      Re the loopstick antenna – to be honest, I just checked the interior images in Jay Allen’s review as I wasn’t sure if I want to keep the S-8800 so I didn’t dare to take it apart. 🙂 You’re right, I missed the left side wires. So yes, with the wire ending there near the BNC that looks a coupling coil rather than a 2nd coil or coil tap for the upper MW.

      The shop where I ordered it even threw a BNC connector into the box. 🙂 Yes indeed, dabbling with 3,5mm phonewhatever adapters or pigtails is not exactly fun, adapters can even help breaking the jack pretty quickly.

      1. 13dka

        Sorry, this should’ve gone one post higher Mark!

        What I wanted to tell you is – now that I’ve convinced you – I hope you really enjoy this radio! After all the testing and comparing business, I took the S-8800 alone to the dike yesterday in order to simply enjoy it. I headed home like 4 hours later than planned – despite the weak condx it was pure fun and quite a blast from the past to tune that big radio through all the bands. While I was turning the dial, I thought a couple of times “what a nice, quiet receiver!” and it really feels more like a tabletop receiver than any of the portables (vintage or not) I could lay my hands on so far.

  9. Guy Atkins

    Wow, great review 13dka! I love the in-depth comparisons you’ve given us.

    You mentioned two coils on the ferrite rod, but I’ve noted three coils. Perhaps you weren’t counting the third coil which connects to the left of the “AM First Mixer Unit 2” shielding cover. I think this one is the inductive coupling coil for the external antenna.

    One additional bravo for Tecsun: the use of a BNC jack on the radio for coaxial cable lead-ins, rather than a RCA (cinch) jack or 3.5mm mini jack. BNC is a standard on many pieces of communications gear and far sturdier than the other types commonly found on portable receivers.

    1. 13dka

      Re the loopstick antenna – to be honest, I just checked the interior images in Jay Allen’s review as I wasn’t sure if I want to keep the S-8800 so I didn’t dare to take it apart. 🙂 You’re right, I missed the left side wires. So yes, with the wire ending there near the BNC that looks a coupling coil rather than a 2nd coil or coil tap for the upper MW.

      The shop where I ordered it even threw a BNC connector into the box. 🙂 Yes indeed, dabbling with 3,5mm phonewhatever adapters or pigtails is not exactly fun, adapters can even help breaking the jack pretty quickly.

    1. 13dka

      Thank you Mike! I know you asked yesterday but I’m sure you can imagine now why I was a bit short on answers (not only because I struggled with the new cellphone keyboard anyway) – it’s a big radio with a lot to talk about inside. 🙂

  10. Peat

    Another great review. The S-8800 seems to be getting a lot of press as of late. I really like it’s form factor and highly-touted SW performance, but any itch to purchase is quickly remedied by it’s price point.

    1. Dan

      Peat –
      I too was hesitant on pulling the trigger on this one – primarily because I get buyers remorse VERY easily when I buy the latest SW receiver to hit the market. That buyers remorse is usually followed by selling the device for a loss on ebay. I can tell you that I’ve had my S-8800 for a year now. It’s not going anywhere.

  11. 13dka

    An important bit is missing in the “Hidden features” section of my review:

    Lennart Benschop reported here


    that using the ‘4’ key to turn on the automatic bandwidth (6) and auto-mute (9) controls results in a much less responsive remote. So you can set these functions as desired but then you should turn off the “master switch” (4) for them again, or the (indeed excellent!) remote will act like the batteries are empty.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.