Category Archives: Mediumwave

Bob’s Radio Corner: Where it Began – The AM Medium Wave Broadcast Band

Copilot Radio, Model Unknown
The dial certainly has some problems, but the rich, Bakelite, art deco cabinet is superb.

By Bob Colegrove

One of the great attractions of the radio hobby is that it has so many different areas on which to specialize.  As examples, one can focus on a particular band, collect or restore radios, DX or just listen.  With so much to choose from, one can impulsively skip from one area to another.  I have tuned the shortwave bands for many years, but I also like the AM medium wave band.  If there is a purpose to this post, it is simply to bring some occasional attention to AM listening and DXing.  There is nothing new in what follows.

What’s in a Name?

To start with, this subject is somewhat confusing by calling it what we do.  There are at least three common terms for the electromagnetic spectrum between 530 kHz and 1700 kHz: 1) AM, 2) broadcast band, and 3) medium wave.  This poses an identity dilemma; that is, none of these names are exclusive.  AM defines a form of modulation, amplitude modulation, which is used in other portions of the spectrum.  The same may be said of broadcast band.  There are several international broadcast bands within the shortwave spectrum.  That leaves us with medium wave.  But that term lacks precision.  What exactly are the boundaries of medium wave?  Shortwave bands have relatively precise names related to their wavelength, 80 meters, 31 meters, etc.  Should we call medium wave the 176-thru-943-meter band, instead?  Let’s just stick with any of the old familiar terms.

In the Beginning

I’m sure many readers share the experience related here.  Even before shortwave there was medium wave.  Our initial encounter may have been with the monolithic, multi-band console radio in the parlor.  However, the house was likely home to one or more less pretentious table radios, which were limited to the medium wave broadcast band.  It all began with curiosity about what lurked in the relative space between the few local stations that played so clearly along the dial.  We likely found less listenable stations poking through in the inter-station space.  These were stations like our own in neighboring communities.  Then, at night, a strange thing happened.  Like stars in the sky, more stations appeared, some hundreds of miles away.  At the same time, some of the stations we heard during the day disappeared, maybe even a local station or two.

Well, one thing led to another, and soon we were keeping track of stations that we heard.  We took note of where they were located and their position on the dial using a new term called kilocycles.  The fastidious among us kept daily logs with dates, times, and reception conditions.  So, our DXing career began.

I came along a full generation after the advent of AM radio broadcasting.  In my early years, it was still the mainstay of public information and entertainment.  Television stations were beginning to pop up across the country one by one, and FM radio’s popularity was still a decade away.  Like any imposing distraction, there was curiosity in what was being heard and, in the case of radio, where it was coming from.

Our house was home to perhaps three or four AM radios.  At the age of seven, I was gifted of a 4-tube Sears Silvertone – mine to keep in my own room.  But the radio that really got me going came along several years later and belonged to my father.  This was a General Electric Model P755A, five-transistor portable.  Shaped somewhat like a lunchbox, including the handle, it was the quintessential portable radio that the world had been waiting for.  It ran for many hours off a single, but pricey 9-volt carbon-zinc battery.  There was purposely no provision to run it from AC power.  Also, it used an internal ferrite core antenna.  There was no jack or terminal for an external antenna.  Besides the tuning knob and volume control, it had a jack for a single earplug.  It was truly portable in all respects.  For all its simplicity, it did its job very well, and I borrowed it whenever the occasion presented itself.

Left: Silvertone Model 132.818-1, Sears, Roebuck & Co (1949, $11.95)
Right: General Electric Model P755A Transistor Portable (1957, $19.95)

As an only child, I was the sole recipient of any goodies that came along, and it wasn’t too long before I had my own comparable Westinghouse portable.  But the GE was really the one that got things started.

A Plethora of Stations

I have recently wondered whether shortwave use has contracted about as far as it can go.  This is not the case with AM, at least not yet.  The graph below shows the total number of AM radio stations in the US throughout history, 100 years.  The total has remained relatively stable since 1960, albeit with a slight downward trend from the peak around 1990.  Stations occasionally come and go.  Some rebrand with a different format or fresh call letters.  Note that the steepest rate of decline, 217 stations, occurred over the past five years, amounting to 4.7%.  Whether this rate of attrition will continue is a matter of speculation.

Medium wave DXing is a lot different than shortwave.  The density of stations will vary depending on what part of the world you live in.  Here on the East Coast of North America, the AM band is saturated with signals.  That is, with a suitable antenna, one can at least detect a station on each of the 118 available channels – certainly at night and possibly even during the day.  On the other hand, some years ago, I had an opportunity to visit Honolulu, Hawaii.  With little time to listen, I only heard a few of the islands’ stations but imagined what possibilities nighttime Dxing held.

Despite the density of stations on the East Coast, there will still be limits on the number of stations logged.  My experience is that initially the log grows quickly, then tapers off steadily as you go along.  Your time is eventually spent locked in on a local or regional frequency, waiting for something you’ve heard to fade out and something you haven’t heard to fade in.  In a previous posting, I worked the lower end of the band rigorously for some time, coming up with a fair number of catches.

Ten-kHz channel separation is the convention in Region 2, the Americas.  There have been some occasional anomalies.  Several years ago, there was a handful of so-called “split-channel” nonconformists, who placed their carriers midway between channels and presented an opportunity to log some hard-to-hear countries.  It was also possible to pull in a few very high-power European and North African stations.  This took advantage of the 9 kHz vs. 10 kHz channel spacings between Region 1 (east) and Region 2 (west).

Seasonal changes are also important.  Winter is the best.  Propagation is generally better and more consistent.  Atmospheric noise is minimal.  Local stations limited to daylight operation have shorter hours.  The gray hours around sunup and sundown can produce unusual DX conditions.

Programming

Programming has changed since the 1950s.  As the go-to medium for public information and entertainment, content was original and competitive.  Mornings were often filled with local DJs playing occasional songs and generally keeping listeners apprised of news and weather.  Traffic helicopters were still in the future.  The genre of soap operas was born and consisted of 15-minute, serialized dramas one after the other during the middle of the day.  Faithful audiences followed these melodramas for many years.  DJs took over the airwaves again in mid-afternoon and continued through dinner time.  Prime time lasted throughout the evening hours with regular drama, comedy and variety shows which were networked throughout the country. Continue reading

NHK Closes Radio 2 After 95 Years on the Air

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Fred Waterer, who shares the following article from RadioInfo Asia that notes NHK has officially closed its long-running Radio 2 service as part of a broader plan to consolidate its radio operations and adapt to shifting audio consumption trends. While the AM-based service ends, much of its educational content will continue on NHK FM and digital platforms.

Read the full article here:
https://radioinfo.asia/news/nhk-shuts-radio-2-after-95-years-on-air/

After 102 Years on AM, ABC Perth Moves to FM

Image Source: ABC

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributors Alan and Tracy Wood for sharing the following news. Tracy writes:

Thomas –
This has an SWL connection as VLW9 and VLW15 ABC-Perth were widely heard in the glory days of shortwave.

The article has several other stories linked to radio, the tower one being the most interesting.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-23/abc-radio-perth-switches-to-102-5fm/106369210

Tracy Wood

The Genesis of Carlos Latuff’s Illustrated Radio Listening Reports

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Carlos Latuff, who writes:

The first time I thought about illustrating news I listened to on the radio, I was a kid, in the kitchen of my aunt’s apartment, I think in the 80s. From her Philco Transglobe receiver, I was informed that a sea lion had appeared on Copacabana beach, or something like that. I imagined what it would be like to draw that unusual event. But it remained just an idea; I never got around to drawing it.

The 20th century passed, and in 2019, I decided to rescue that childhood idea from the past. I made my first illustrated radio logbook:

This minilog would be the embryo of what I now call an “Illustrated Radio Listening Report.” A way to record, in illustration form, historical moments listened on the radio.

I hope to leave to those who come after me, research material, both on History and on radio. With this in mind, I’m making available here on SWLing Post this PDF with some of my illustrated reports of news captured by radio in 2025, related to climate change, a crucial theme of our times. This is my legacy as an artist AND radio enthusiast. Enjoy! ?

WNAM Final Broadcast and DX Test Announcement: December 30-31, 2025

The following announcement was shared by Loyd Van Horn of DX Central:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

1280 – WNAM DX Test Announcement

Dec 27, 2025

The Courtesy Program Committee (CPC) of the National Radio Club (NRC) and the International Radio Club of America (IRCA) announces a special DX Test for distant listeners for radio station WNAM on 1280 kHz in Neenah-Menasha,WI. The test is scheduled for Tuesday, December 30th and Wednesday, December 31st starting at Midnight local Central Standard Time through 5:05 AM Central Standard Time (This equates to 0600 to 1105 UTC on 30 December and 31 December).

This test is scheduled to run for 2 minutes after ABC News at the top-of-the-hour each hour from Midnight to 5am local Central time. ABC News runs from :00-:03 after the hour. The DX Test will run from :03-:05 after the hour, each hour of the window.

These test transmissions are being broadcast in conjunction with the final days of broadcast of WNAM. WNAM is scheduled to cease broadcast operations at 11:59 PM Central Time on December 31st.

These test transmissions are a way to honor the history of WNAM in its service to the community as well as provide an opportunity for DXers to hear WNAM one last time – or possibly the first time!

The test will consist of an assortment of classic station jingles, sweep tones, voice IDs, morse code and other sounds.

WNAM will be operating at their daytime power/pattern for the duration of the test events.

In addition, listeners/DXers are invited to tune in WNAM’s special 3-hour farewell broadcast on Wednesday, December 31, starting at 9:00 PM Central Standard Time. This will include a “recreation” of the station’s glory years as “Blue 128” complete with airchecks from previous on-air staff.

RECEPTION REPORTS & QSL REQUESTS

All reception reports will be verified through the station directly with a special QSL that was developed for the occasion. Reception reports along with MP3 recordings or .MP4 video recordings of your reception should be emailed to:

[email protected]. Please be sure to use the subject line: “WNAM 1280 DX TEST RECEPTION REPORT.”

The following are recommendations are in effect in order to expedite processing and receive a QSL verifying your report:

    • Reports via email only – this is required. An MP3 file attachment of your reception (best reception) or an MP4 video clip are preferred. While written descriptions will be considered along with the recording, they may not suffice alone for verification.
    • Reports must be submitted within 30 days of the test.
    • The report must include your name, location, and return email address, clearly grouped together at the top of the verification request.
    • Please also include a description of your receiver, antenna, and any interference noted.
    • If you use a remote SDR to receive the test, you must clearly indicate that in your verification request. We will only accept one such report per DX’er. You cannot log the test on multiple remote SDRs and request multiple verifications.

The IRCA/NRC CPC would like to thank the owners and staff of WNAM}, Steve Edwards and CPC member Loyd Van Horn for helping to arrange the test.

Good luck to all DXers!

About the CPC

The Courtesy Program Committee (CPC) is a cross-functional group comprised of members of both the National Radio Club (NRC) and International Radio Club of America (IRCA) for the purpose of coordinating and arranging DX Tests with AM radio stations. These DX tests both allow radio stations to conduct valuable equipment tests on their transmitter and audio chain as well as enable DX hobbyists to receive the testing station from greater distances than would normally be possible. The CPC membership consists of: Chairman Les Rayburn, Paul Walker, George Santulli, Joe Miller and Loyd Van Horn.

For radio stations interested in coordinating a DX test with the CPC, please visit the following Web site for more information:

https://amdxtest.blogspot.com/

For more information on the types of content heard during a DX test, the video “An introduction to DX Tests” is available at DX Central:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQX_zmEC4fY

Don Pushes Portable Antennas Further: Loop Size, Performance, and Real-World Limits (Part 2)

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Don Moore–noted author, traveler, and DXer–who shares the following post:


Two Portable Antennas for Remote DXing (Part Two)

By Don Moore

Don’s traveling DX stories can be found in his book Tales of a Vagabond DXer [SWLing Post affiliate link]. If you’ve already read his book and enjoyed it, do Don a favor and leave a review on Amazon.

In my initial comparison of the PA0RDT mini-whip and the MLA-30+ MegaLoop, the mini-whip performed best on medium wave and the lower shortwave bands, while the loop worked better on the higher bands. But, I wondered, why should the MLA-30+ be restricted to that small steel loop? The wire loops I use with my Wellbrook ALA-100LN typically range from twenty to fifty meters in circumference.

I threw a twenty-five-meter wire over a tree branch and formed it into a delta with the MLA-30+ in the bottom center. Remember, I was testing in the northern Chicago suburbs. My SDRs were completely overloaded. Medium wave was useless and I had strong MW stations all over the shortwave bands. The MLA-30+ doesn’t have the same strong-signal handling capabilities as the Wellbrook. And there are a lot of strong medium wave signals in the Chicago suburbs.

So I took that wire down and replaced it with a loop of twelve meters circumference.

That did the trick. I had lots of signals on medium wave without the overloading. Here’s what the upper end of the MW band now looked like with the MLA-30+.

For comparison, here’s the same wire loop using the Wellbrook ALA-100LN. The Wellbrook has a slightly lower noise floor but otherwise the signals are about the same.

Out of curiosity, I replaced the Wellbrook power unit with the Bias-T from the MLA-30+ but left the Wellbrook antenna head unit in place. With this hybrid setup there’s no visible difference with the full Wellbrook.

I was satisfied with my findings but I still wondered how much wire the MLA-30+ could handle. A few weeks later I ran some more tests in Kansas, where I knew the dial wouldn’t be as crowded. The MLA-30+ easily handled a 25-meter delta loop without overloading.

Two weeks after doing the Kansas tests I was at a DXpedition in rural western Pennsylvania. The MLA-30+ worked fine with a 40-meter circumference loop, other than being a tad noisier than the Wellbrook with the same wire. So how much wire you can use with the MLA-30+ components depends on how strong your local medium wave stations are.

Findings

From the SDR images above it would be easy to conclude that with the right length of wire an MLA-30+ is just as good as a Wellbrook ALA-100LN even though it is significantly cheaper. But that’s not the full picture. Back in the 1990s my Drake R-8 cost about three times what my Sony ICF-2010 did.  All other things being equal, I would say that 95% of the DX heard on the Drake could have been heard equally well on the Sony. I wanted the Drake for the other five percent.

I have no doubt that if I did a very careful head-to-head comparison of the two units under serious DX conditions on the same wire that the Wellbrook would get things the MLA-30+ couldn’t. But I suspect the difference would be around that five percent mark. I’m willing to accept that tradeoff for an effective cheap light-weight travel antenna. And the MLA-30+ is like having two antennas in one. I can use it with the steel loop in limited space situations or with a larger wire loop when I have access to some garden space with a tree. Together, the MLA-30+ and the PA0RDT make the perfect DX travel antennas.

The only thing I didn’t like about the MLA-30+ was that pre-attached coax cable. It’s not the best quality and I’d rather carry my own cable. I’m not very handy with a soldering iron in tight spaces but at our recent DXpedition my friend Bill Nollman replaced the coax with a BNC jack for me.

The MLA-30+ now looks like this when connected to a wire loop.

Finally, I should address powering the MLA-30+ via USB. While it can be connected to a spare USB port on your laptop, I found doing that sometimes introduced a tad more noise. Instead I’ve been using one of those battery packs used for recharging cellphones. Mine is rated at 6700 mAh and it can power the MLA-30+ for over 48 hours before needing a recharge. But be sure to test yours before doing any serious DXing. I’ve read that some power packs have a minimum required power draw and will automatically shut off if the draw is too low.

Another Option?

While I was finishing this article I heard about another option from my friend Guy Atkins.  This antenna is a combination of the YouLoop with a low-priced Chinese made clone of the LZ1AQ amplifier. Some users say it’s better than the MLA-30+. Guy says it works well on shortwave up to 16 meters but he hasn’t tried it on medium wave. Guy says it’s a “low price, good value” antenna. I’m traveling in Southeast Asia for the winter but will definitely have to try this antenna when I get back to the USA. So maybe there will be a follow-up article next summer.

Links

[Note: Amazon links are affiliate and support the SWLing Post at no cost to you.]

Info on ordering a quality PA0RDT from Roelof Bakker. (Other cheaper versions have had issues with quality control.)

https://dl1dbc.net/SAQ/miniwhip.html

There are various versions of the MLA-30+ and the original MLA-30. This is the version that Mark Taylor recommended and that I bought.

https://amzn.to/3MEKjPY

There are numerous YouTube videos on using and modifying both versions of the MLA-30+. This one shows how to replace the coax with a BNC jack.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAqh2Lawwdc

Here’s the Amazon link for the YouLoop/LZ1AQ antenna that Guy has.

https://amzn.to/4s1RB09

And the same antenna on Ali Express.

https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256808527623276.html

Portable Antennas for Serious DXing: Don’s Field Tests from Parks to the Open Road (Part 1)

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Don Moore–noted author, traveler, and DXer–who shares the following post:


Two Portable Antennas for Remote DXing (Part One)

By Don Moore

Don’s traveling DX stories can be found in his book Tales of a Vagabond DXer [SWLing Post affiliate link]. If you’ve already read his book and enjoyed it, do Don a favor and leave a review on Amazon.

Once upon a time, I had a traditional DX shack with an L-shaped desk and shelves of receivers, radio gadgets, and DX books. Everything I wanted or needed as a DXer was right at hand. Then I retired and was finally able to pursue my lifelong itch for serious travel. But there was no way to carry that DX shack along with me. Fortunately, modern technology was there to help. SDRs are significantly more travel-friendly than my old Sony ICF-2010 (let alone the Drake R-8). Instead of books and bulletins, my DX reference materials are websites and PDF files on my laptop.

I spend several months a year traveling internationally with just a suitcase and knapsack. That doesn’t leave much room for DX equipment. Several years ago I described my approach to vagabond DXing in an article here.

https://swling.com/blog/2019/03/radio-travel-a-complete-sdr-station-for-superb-portable-dxing/

Since writing that article in 2019, I’ve continued to work on making my portable DX shack better and more compact. Recently, I replaced the Elad FDM-S2 with three Airspy HF+ Discovery SDRs. Not only are they smaller and lighter, but I can record three different band segments at once. Next up was rethinking my travel antennas. A wire loop with the Wellbrook ALA-100LN is still, in my opinion, the best travel antenna. But the components are heavy and are now irreplaceable since they are no longer made. So over the summer, I set about testing and comparing both old and new options. But you don’t have to wander the globe for my findings to be useful to you. This can be just as helpful for DXing from a nearby park. That’s how I did my testing.

I spent the past summer staying at an AirBnB in the north Chicago suburbs. I wanted a better location for testing so I checked out parks in the area and finally settled on Preserve Shelter B (42.26797, -87.92208) at the Old School Forest Preserve, east of Libertyville in northern Illinois. The shelter was entirely wood, with standard asphalt shingles (rather than steel), and had no nearby power lines. I made four daytime DXpeditions there to do some utility DXing and to run my tests. Here’s a photo of my setup.

I decided I should rerun the tests at least one other location. So while driving across the US in mid-October, I stopped for a few hours one morning at Park Shelter A (39.11144, -94.86629) in Wyandotte County Park, just west of Kansas City, Kansas. There, I just had a minimum setup.

The Antennas

So, what were the antennas I was testing? The first was the tried-and-true PA0RDT mini-whip from Roelof Bakker. The PA0RDT is described in my 2019 article and is probably the most portable quality antenna you can get. To power it I use a battery box and eight rechargeable lithium-ion AA cells.

 For the traveling DXer, setting up the PA0RDT is as easy as it comes. I just attach the coax cable and throw it over a support, such as a picnic shelter beam or a tree branch.

But I’ve always believed that the best antenna is another antenna. That is, every antenna works differently, and therefore the more options you have, the more likely you will have something that works well in any situation. So if I wanted to leave the Wellbrook at home, what might complement the PA0RDT? I contacted my friend Mark Taylor, who I knew had a large collection of the various inexpensive Chinese-made amplified loops. With his help, I settled on the MLA-30+ MegaLoop from DmgicPro.

This antenna consists of a steel wire loop that connects to terminals on the amplifier box. The amplifier has a ten-meter coax cable, which in turn is connected to a small bias-T power supply, which gets its power via a USB connection. The MLA-30+ is designed to be used in a permanent installation with some sort of vertical support, such as a PVC pipe. Some users replace the wire loop with copper tubing.

Those options aren’t practical for me, and simply hanging the antenna from the top would cause the steel loop to stretch and deform. So I came up with the idea of tying a strong cord from the top to the bottom of the loop so that the cord, and not the loop, bears the weight. To hang the antenna, I throw the cord over the support, attach the antenna, and then pull it up into place. That works well if you have rear support to hold it in place, such as the beams of a picnic shelter.

It’s a bit more difficult to mount the MLA-30+ in a tree.

Comparing the Antennas

I ran comparisons between the antennas several times at Old School Forest Preserve and then again at Wyandotte County Park. The results were practically the same every time. The images below were made at Old School unless otherwise stated.

The PA0RDT was designed to be a good performer on longwave and medium wave. Unsurprisingly, it shows a lot of signals on the upper end of the medium wave band, even during the daytime. Except for being non-directional, the PA0RDT is an excellent MW antenna.

The MLA-30+, on the other hand, isn’t good for much beyond hearing the strongest local signals on medium wave.

When I ran these tests in the late morning, WWV on 5 MHz was the only signal in the 60-meter band. It had a very listenable signal on the PA0RDT.

But on the MLA-30+, WWV was barely there.

Likewise on 49 meters, CFRX on 6070 kHz was very clear on the PA0RDT but barely listenable on the MLA-30+. But when I moved up to 31 meters, the difference between the antennas mostly disappeared, as in these images made in Kansas. The PA0RDT is top and the MLA-30+ on the bottom.

On 25 meters, the PA0RDT is picking up a lot of noise and the signals are not that strong. Nor were signals very strong on 19, 16, 0r 13 meters.

However, on 25 meters with the MLA-30+ there isn’t much noise and the signals are booming in. And 19, 16, and 13 meters likewise had strong signals.

So the PA0RDT is clearly the best antenna for MW and the lower shortwave bands, but it doesn’t do as well on the higher bands. This wasn’t a surprise to me as I’ve always felt that the PA0RDT underperformed above nine or ten Megahertz. The MLA-30+ was abysmal at the lower frequencies but worked better or just as well in the middle and higher shortwave bands. The best antenna is another antenna. Each one performs better in different situations. But I couldn’t help but wonder … was the problem with the MLA-30+ that small steel wire loop?

Look for Don’s Part 2 article next weekend on the SWLing Post!