Category Archives: Shortwave Radio

Dave’s Digitech AR-1780 notes

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, David Morton, who comments with assessment of the Digitech AR-1780:

I’ve been using [the Digitech AR-1780] in Australia (southern Tasmania) for about 5 weeks.  In the last 10 or so days, I’ve got a 26m long wire hanging fairly reliably on a N-S bearing.  My history is that I trained as a marine radio operator in the early 1980s, but worked in commercial IT; so no real radio theory and I only just started listening to SW again since being a volunteer in the South Pacific in the mid 1990s.

Now, to this radio.  I quite like it although it has quirks I wish it didn’t have.  In the 1990s, I used a Panasonic RF-B45 and it was rock solid until it died a few years ago.  Every now and then, I try to fix it, but no luck…

Reception here is quite limited and that’s how I discovered the first quirk:  when it scans at SW frequencies it skips. For example it seems to jump from about 9400kHz to 11000kHz.  I also have an old Jaycar AR1747 and it also skips when scanning.  They also skip from about 26100 and restart at 2300kHz.  Whether it’s a design feature, or a fault, I don’t know. Other than that, I think it’s a great radio so far.  The AR1780 lets you type in the frequencies it skips, it just won’t scan them.

Until I start to find some reliable interesting stations (I’ve picked up some Radio NZ Int and BBC World Service), I’m doing a fair bit of listening to WWVH in Hawaii.  Sure listening to the time isn’t as fun, but it serves a purpose when comparing radios side by side.  WWVH broadcasts on 2500, 5000, 10000, 15000, 20000 and 25000 kHZ I think.  I can usually get 15000 subject to propagation at any time.

Until I gave it away, I also had a Jaycar AR1733 and it also skipped; they all probably share a common chip and skip the same frequencies although I haven’t checked closely.  This radio looks identical to the Skywave many of you mention.  The old AR1747 also had a Crane equivalent, and this was helpful as Crane’s manual was much better!

On the first tests with my long wire antenna, the AR1733 had a fairly clear signal, beat the old AR1747 and the AR1780 was the best.  The AR1747 is hard on its D batteries, so may have been handicapped.  As it got dark, I found the signal didn’t change much on 15000 kHz with any radio, but only the AR1780 would find 5000 kHz while scanning (since it skips over 10000 kHZ).  The AR1747 does not have a keypad, so all tuning is by a dial or the scan function.

Oh yes, a hint I’ve learned for Golan.  I gained the habit of punching  then the desired frequency, then .  The precludes the need to type in leading zeroes and trailing zeros.  For example, I get WWVH by  5000 , while 15000 is  15000.  This may go all the way back to the RF-B45, so I’ve had time to acquaint myself.

Next is batteries, the AR1733/Skywave needs 2xAA batteries, the AR1780 takes 4xAA as did the RF-B45.  I haven’t yet run down any batteries in the AR1780 yet, but all my radios with 4 batteries have always worked better than those with only two.  So the extra size is worth it, and the AR-1780 is a fair bit smaller than the old RF-B45.  The AR1747 was an exception, it took 4xAA and 4xD and AA’s were almost a waste of time in it.  But hey, it’s a telephone book size radio with a big speaker; so I keep it plugged in as much as I can.

Anyway, it’s almost 4PM here, we’re on DST so it’s GMT+11 hours.  The bands start opening up soon so I want to get back to the radio.  I’ve still got a lot of work to find the who, what and where of SW broadcasters.  At least logging them is easy these days, when you tune into something, just point the mobile and it and make a movie!

Thanks for your feedback, David!  I also think the AR-1780 is a gem of a little radio.

Click here to read our review of the Digitech AR-1780.

CommRadio CTX-10 approved by FCC

The CommRadio CTX-10

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, R. Lewis (KF5GV), who writes:

Just noticed on Universal Radio web page the Comm Radio CTX-10 has been approved by the FCC. They are accepting pre-orders on Dec 1. No indication of pricing but hope they announce it soon.

Thanks for the tip!

I’m looking forward to checking out the CommRadio CTX-10. For one thing, it’s in one of my favorite radio categories: portable general coverage QRP transceivers!

Since the CTX-10 receiver is likely an iteration of the excellent CommRadio CR1 series, I expect it’ll perform well on the broadcast bands as well as the ham bands. I look forward to reviewing the CTX-10.

The new CTX-10 prototype from CommRadio at Universal Radio’s 2017 Hamvention booth.

Follow the tag CommRadio CTX-10 for updates.

Sony ICF-6800W: Dan notes a possible record sales price on eBay

 Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who writes:

A couple of years ago I did a talk a the annual SWL Fest on the best radios of all time (in my opinion anyway). The SONY ICF-6800W was among them, for reasons I think are valid — high sensitivity and beautiful audio, the major ones. Now, one has sold for what could be a record price on eBay — more than $1300. This shows how much folks are willing to pay for 6800Ws that still have the original box….

Wow–to many the ICF-6800W is a “Holy Grail” receiver. Amazing that it has held its value so well. If memory serves, it’s not the easiest radio to work on, but is certainly serviceable.

Thanks for the info, Dan!

Troy spots a rare Philips AE3905 on eBay

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Troy Riedel, who writes:

The radio is the PHILIPS AE3905 – and made in … wait … Austria!

There is one on eBay right now.

The first listing started at $275 – there were no takers – so now the second listing is set at $250.

Phillips still has a support page for this tiny little radio – which is essentially a page where people can download a manual:

http://www.p4c.philips.com/cgi-bin/cpindex.pl?scy=DK&slg=EN&ctn=AE3905

Universal Radio lists it on their “Discontinued” page here:

https://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/portable/ae3905.html

I do not believe it was ever reviewed in Passport to World Band Radio. The first appearance of it was an advertisement in the 1992 Passport. It also appeared in an ad in the 1993 Passport, but by 1994 it was gone. This radio was released to compete with the Sony ICF-SW100 and was apparently very short-lived.

There isn’t a lot of online information about it, just a forum posting asking members to list “the most over-rated SW radio ever” and this one received a vote. The posting states this radio was known to have capacitor issues (just like every other radio of the era) & “poorly designed battery contacts” that would fail.

There is at least 1 video of the radio on YouTube pitting it against the ICF-SW100, and the Sony is very clearly better.

This appears to be a radio [only] for collectors &/or uber radio enthusiasts, but I feel this price point is a bit steep.

Click here to view on eBay.

The thrill of the hunt even knowing there is no “perfect” radio

Though I own a number of portables that have better performance specs and ergonomics, I still gravitate to my ICF-SW7600GR.

Most recently, I received correspondence from Golan Klinger who has been bitten by the radio bug (he calls it “radioitis”). He has been acquiring portables and comparing them, seeking his favorite overall.

Golan had an epiphany he recently shared with me:

Thomas, in your “Mega Review” [summarizing your radio preferences] you wrote:

But this is my personal choice; you might have a completely different answer. I guess that’s the point I made earlier–it all depends on the listener.”

Of all the valuable advice I’ve gleaned from your website, that might be the most important.

Every radio seems to have its own personality and one can read and watch all the reviews in the world but there’s no substitute for sitting down and actually listening to a radio.

I just had an epiphany — there can be no perfect radio and even if there were, finding it wouldn’t be half as much fun as the search for it.

That’s why everyone has multiple radios and when asked which is their favourite they lean back and say, “Well…”

What a wonderful hobby this is turning out to be!

You nailed it, Golan.

Indeed, with most every review I post I receive both praise and criticism later from readers. To some, sensitivity is everything–to others, it’s audio fidelity. Some listeners seek optimal reception on particular bands: longwave, mediumwave, the 31 meter band, FM, etc. There are even some who place a great deal of importance on the design and aesthetics of the radio. When I write a review, I do my best to walk in the shoes of all of these folks. It’s not an easy task.

When I’m not writing a review and am only concerned with what I value in a radio, it’s a balance of performance, flexibility and ergonomics I seek.

But as you say, there is no “perfect radio” out there that could satisfy everyone. I doubt there ever will be.  Each listener has their own set of preferences–the checklist that matters to them most.

I’ll admit that part of what drives me to do radio reviews is my curiosity and the hope that each upcoming model might be a step closer to the elusive “Holy Grail” radio; for me and for you. It’s all about the thrill of the hunt!

Thanks for sharing, Golan!

Dan spots a mint Panasonic RF-B65 on eBay

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Dan Robinson, who shares the following:

This does not appear to have the AC adaptor — not all kits included that, but they are findable on Ebay] OK, folks here’s your chance — a Panasonic RF-B65, one of the best portables of all time in terms of overall sensitivity and audio (in this size category) in what appears to be Like New condition. Price is about right for one of these complete with box, manuals, etc I usually jump on these but I already have two in this condition….

Click here to view on eBay.

The RF-B65 is certainly a highly regarded portable and Dan knows I’m on the hunt for one. Frankly, I’ll probably wait until next year to search for a deal. This model is not the cheapest, but looks incredibly clean and is being sold by a seasoned seller with 100% positive feedback. If you’ve been considering an RF-65B, this is a good one.  Thanks for the tip, Dan!

Ron discovers a military version of the Hallicrafters S-39 on eBay

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Ron, who writes:

Thought I had seen them all, but here is the military version of the S-38:

Click here to view on eBay.

Also an earlier version of the Echophone:

Click here to view on eBay.

I’m a huge fan of Hallicrafters radios–especially from this era.  I’ve a friend that has this version of the S-39, but it hasn’t been restored yet. When he does restore it, I’ll try to steal it for a few weeks and head to the field pretending I’m listening to instructions from HQ from behind enemy lines!

Thanks for the tip, Ron!

Update: Ron also points out this excellent gallery of Hallicrafter radios.