Tag Archives: Jock Elliott (KB2GOM)

The Great Gonzo Radio Experiment

By Jock Elliott, KB2GOM

It’s funny how you can start out thinking about how to solve a problem, the whole process takes a turn, and you wind up with an unexpected but pleasing result.

It all started innocently enough. Alan posted this — https://swling.com/blog/2024/11/bbc-rd-how-to-test-a-loop-antenna/ — and this statement appeared at the end of a BBC report on how to test loop antennas:

“Polarisation Illustrations of the antenna usually show it mounted upright; that is, with
its axis parallel to the ground. This is fine for the reception of LF and MF transmissions, which are vertically polarised, but most HF transmissions are horizontally polarised.”

When I tested that assertion here — https://swling.com/blog/2024/12/here-we-go-loop-de-loop-in-which-your-humble-correspondent-tests-a-hypothesis/ — there were a couple of interesting responses.

Bob Colegrove said (in part):

“To address your conundrum, from my long-standing, untutored tinkering with loop antennas, I have concluded that, regardless of LW, MW, or SW, optimum performance for peaks and nulls requires that the axis of the loop (i.e., line through the center of the coil) be able to rotate 360 degrees laterally and 90 degrees vertically.” (emphasis mine)

Robert Gulley added:

“I will have to concur with Bob – if I may state it another way, there is no “proper” position for a loop when getting shortwave signals.”

To which I responded:

“I suppose the ultimate setup might be an articulated motorized outdoor mount with a joystick inside that would allow me to fiddle the loop to the optimal position.”

Early in the morning I awoke thinking about how a system capable of manipulating my three-foot-diameter MFJ 1886 loop both vertically and horizontally might be implemented. Everything that came to mind seemed awkward, hard to put together, difficult to operate, expensive, and just plain clunky.

I dozed off and woke up thinking: “What about a really small loop? I could hold it in my hand and easily turn it to different positions to optimize reception, no equipment required.”

A thought came to mind: “You’ve got a small loop antenna, why don’t you see what you can do with it?”

At this point, I need to make my Shameful Admission: I got so intrigued by the idea of using my wrist and hand to turn a small loop to various orientations that I forgot that I was trying to solve the problem of manipulating a shortwave loop.

The loop that came to mind is the Terk AM Advantage. I tested it here. Designed to boost signals on medium wave, it is a nine-inch tunable loop encased in plastic that requires no power supply. It inductively couples with the ferrite antenna inside a portable radio. But I seemed to recall that it also comes with a direct wire connector that can be used with some radios. Perhaps I could connect it to my CCrane EP-PRO which has clips and a switch for an external medium wave antenna on the back of the case.

I found the Terk AM Advantage easily enough, but the direct wire connector required a major archeological dig. Once I unearthed it, I plugged the connector into the back of the Terk AM Advantage, slipped the wires from the connector into the clips on the back of the EP-PRO.

Now to try it out . . .

Tuning slowly down the dial, I found across a very faint signal that I could barely copy. Reaching around the back of the EP-PRO, I switched from the EP-PRO’s internal antenna to the Terk AM Advantage external loop antenna (which I was holding in my hand), rotated it from side to side, tipped it back and forth, and – tah-dah! – was rewarded by a far more copyable signal. It was WEEU in Reading PA, 200 miles away, transmitting 6,000 watts into the darkness on 830 kHz. Switching back to the EP-PRO’s internal antenna, I tried rotating the EP-PRO to optimize the signal but could not produce a signal that was as good as the external loop.

Repeating the procedure with additional faint stations, I got the same results: better reception with the handheld loop antenna, and it was fun and easy to use. I held it in my left hand (it’s light) so I could rotate the dial that peaks the signal with my thumb and working the tuning knob on the EP-PRO with my right hand. It was a very pleasing, almost addictive, experience.

If you’re looking for a potent setup for medium wave DXing, I can recommend the EP-PRO/Terk AM Advantage combo, even though it wasn’t my original objective. Call it serendipity.

In the meantime, does anyone know what might be the smallest loop that could be handheld for shortwave reception and would provide a performance boost over a whip antenna?

Spread the radio love

Here we go loop de loop . . . in which your humble correspondent tests a hypothesis

16 Replies

By Jock Elliott, KB2GOM

It was this post by Alan — https://swling.com/blog/2024/11/bbc-rd-how-to-test-a-loop-antenna/ — that set me off. After downloading the BBC report on how to test a loop antenna, I noticed the following in it:

“Polarisation Illustrations of the antenna usually show it mounted upright; that is, with
its axis parallel to the ground. This is fine for the reception of LF and MF transmissions, which
are vertically polarised, but most HF transmissions are horizontally polarised.”

Huh, I thought, “I wonder this would have any bearing on how I use my MFJ 1886 loop antenna?

So hooking the 1886 loop to an SDRplay RSPdx, here’s what the spectrum looks like on medium wave in vertical orientation with the 1886’s internal amp turned on:

And here’s what the medium wave spectrum looks like with the loop in horizontal orientation, amp on:

But what about shortwave reception? Here’s 31 meters in vertical orientation:

And here’s 31 meters with the loop in horizontal orientation:

Here’s 25 meters in vertical orientation:

Here’s 25 meters in horizontal orientation:

It looks to me, at the very least, the noise floor is lower . . . or I am in desperate need of a laxative?

For more about my adventures with the 1886 loop, check this — https://swling.com/blog/2022/10/testing-the-mfj-1886-receive-loop-antenna/ — and this — https://swling.com/blog/2023/01/saturday-morning-fun-fat-mw-dxing-with-the-mfj-1886/

My conclusions: I definitely don’t want the 1886 loop in horizontal orientation for medium wave DXing, but I think that the flat orientation might help for shortwave DXing.

What do you think?

Spread the radio love

Responding to “The Colegrove Inspiration”

16 Replies

By Jock Elliott, KB2GOM

It was Bob Colegrove’s post — this one — that inspired me and set me on this path.

Medium wave broadcast band DXing (MWBCB) has a certain fascination for me, but I am poor at it. Oh sure, I have read the advice: map the band at noon, then again at midnight, and you’ll have a better idea of what’s unusual as you are tuning around. But I have never gotten around to doing the mapping, so my DXing skills are lousy at best.

When Bob asked, “What’s your favorite corner of the dial?”, he also mentioned the challenge hunting below 600 kHz. The implication: whatever is in that section of the band, there are probably not a lot of stations, and they are hard to hear. So, I reasoned in my tiny little brain: “If I hear anything down there, it’s likely to be DX.”

So I tried it, firing up the Grundig Satellit 800 hooked to an MFJ 1886 loop during the daylight hours. With exception of WROW, 590, in nearby Albany, NY, blasting oldies with 5,000 watts, I found nothing . . . and I do mean nothing: nada, diddly, bupkas, cipher, rien . . . dead band . . . deader than old Jacob Marley. I try it again in the early evening with three different radios with exactly the same results. Nuts.

But then I try again with the Satellit 800/1886 combo at a little after 0900Z and take Bob’s advice about using single sideband. Aha! Carriers 540, 550, and 560. Then at 570, a weird mixture: religious programming in American English over male and female voices in Spanish with time ticks and tones in the background. Is there a time station on this frequency or is it some sort of bleed-over?

On Tuesday evenings I run the Radio Monitoring Net on the 146.94 repeater. During the net, I mentioned the unusual signal I had heard on 570, and W2SRA, an expert DXer, responded with the opinion that this was likely a religious station on Long Island, NY, intermixed with a station known as The Clock from Cuba.

Here’s what Wikipedia has to say about it: Radio Reloj (Spanish for Radio Clock) is a government-owned Spanish-language radio station in Cuba . . . The station is noted for the sound of a ticking clock in the background, with its hosts announcing the time, every minute of broadcast.

I checked the distance from Troy, NY, to Santa Clara, Cuba where the 570 AM station is located; it’s 1449 miles. Wow! According to Wikipedia, the AM transmit power is 50,000 watts

Then I remember that William, KR8L, mentioned that he likes searching above 1620 (another less populated region of the band), so I give that a try. At 1690, I hear oldies, followed by ads for Southern Maryland. The station finally ID’s as WPTX, 1,000 watts nighttime power, in California, MD, a distance of 339 miles. Yes!!

Thanks, Bob and William, for turning me on to some more radio fun!

Spread the radio love

From the Archives: When the fertilizer hits the fan radio kit

15 Replies

By Jock Elliott, KB2GOM

Murphy’s Law: If anything can go wrong, it will.

1^st corollary: Even if anything can’t go wrong, it still will.

2^nd corollary: It will go wrong in the worst possible place at the worst possible time.

Most devastating corollary: Murphy was an optimist.

“It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future.” – Yogi Berra

The Better Half thinks I am sick, and maybe she is right, but I am unrepentant: I like disaster movies and books. True stories are better than fiction, but I like both, and I am curious about how people, real or imagined, get through whatever Horrible Event faces them.

As I have written before–here, here, and here–that when bad stuff happens, radio can be a really useful tool.

It was a comment from a reader – Rob, W4ZNG – that got me thinking some more about this. He mentioned enduring three weeks without electricity on the Mississippi Gulf Coast as a result of Katrina. So we had a phone conversation about: What do you want in your radio kit bag when faced with a longer duration, more severe regional or national emergency?

Here’s some of the stuff we agreed upon.

Gathering Information

At the most basic level, you want a radio capable of receiving local AM or FM broadcasters, and it would be good to know ahead of time which local stations have local news staffs that can broadcast useful in formation in times of crisis. In addition, if you live in the US or Canada, I absolutely recommend the ability to receive NOAA weather radio. The ability to run off batteries is critical, in case the mains power is out. In addition, a generous supply of batteries, or a means to recharge batteries is in order. If you decide to go with recharging batteries, you need to think about your options now, not when the lights go out.

In Rob’s case, during Katrina, all of the local broadcasters were wiped out. There was a local low-power FM broadcaster who got permission to increase power to 1,000 watts and was broadcasting where to get food and water. There was a New Orleans AM station that was on the air, but all of its coverage was “New Orleans-centric.” After a few days, some local FM broadcaster, working together, cobbled together a station that they put on the air and began broadcasting news. Rob also began DXing AM stations at night to get additional news.

We agreed that shortwave broadcasters were not likely to be very useful in most cases, but a shortwave radio with the ability to hear ham radio single sideband networks might well be.

To scan, or not to scan, that is the question

Another potential source of information are local public agency radio transmissions in the VHF and UHF ranges that could be heard with a scanner. But – and this is a very big but – that depends a lot on whether your local government (first responders, etc.) transmissions are encrypted. You need to check a source like https://www.radioreference.com/db/ to see if Public Safety transmissions in your area are encrypted. If they are, you will be unable to decipher them, no matter what equipment you own. However, an inexpensive analog-only scanner may prove very useful for listening to ham transmissions VHF and UHF (2 meters and 440 primarily) as well as FRS and GMRS.

If your local Public Safety radio systems are not encrypted, the RR database will give the details of the radio systems used by those agencies, and that in turn will determine the level of sophistication of scanner that will be required to hear their transmission.

The Radio Reference database also includes a listing of national radio frequencies including a list of federal disaster frequencies such as might be used by FEMA. In addition, I have found that the folks at the Radio Reference forum are generous with their time and expertise: https://forums.radioreference.com/ . If all this sounds a bit daunting, there are scanners that have built-in databases of all available frequencies and radio systems, and all you need to do is put in your zip code and select which services you want to hear. I own one, they work well, but they are expensive.

Summoning Help

Assuming that the power is out, your cell phone may or may not work (during Hurricane Katrina, some people found that they could not make voice phone calls, but text messages would go through).

If the cell phones are not working, two-way radio may be useful to summon help and gather information. Again, some research on your part is in order. Perhaps there are 2-meter or 440 ham repeaters in your area with backup power, or maybe there is a robust GMRS repeater system. If so, get your ham or GMRS license and start participating! (It was his experience during Hurricane Katrina that prompted Rob to get his ham license, and when Hurricane Zeta hit, he was glad he had it.)

FRS bubble-pack radios are good for staying in touch while getting around the immediate neighborhood. It’s also good to have a few spares to hand to neighbors if the need arises. Often on sale (especially after Christmas) in multi-packs for less than $10 each.

Rob notes that great strides have been made in hardening cell phone towers since Katrina. When Hurricane Harvey clobbered Houston in 2017, the cell net stayed up. Even so, it would be prudent not to count on it!

The Bottom Line

At a bare minimum the ability to receive your local AM and FM broadcasters is essential, and NOAA weather radio is also very useful. At the next step up, depending upon your local situation, a scanner may help you to gather information. In addition, the ability to monitor ham transmissions may also add to your information gathering abilities. Finally, having a ham license and the ability to transmit on ham frequencies may be very valuable in a widespread or long-duration emergency.

Spread the radio love

Nutty Idea XHDATA D-220 DX Contest Results

23 Replies

By Jock Elliott, KB2GOM

In the run-up to the Nutty Idea XHDATA D-200 DX Contest, I really thought that sorting through the data might take a while. Why? Because I heard from so many people who said they had bought the D-220, were pleasantly surprised at its performance, and thought the contest sounded like fun.

But it turned out not to be so . . . only two “official” entries were received, plus an email from a ham radio friend who participated.

So I thought I would like the participants speak for themselves.

Don

First setup. I used a trimmed printer label and pen on my D-220 to mark the SW bands and key frequencies – so marks on WWV, CHU, FT8 on 7, 10, 14, 18 and 21MHz (nice I could hear them all) and some marks of the key SWL bands. I spent Friday trying to do everything indoors on my second floor and Sat outdoors. Of course, waiting for station IDs became the big roadblock. I didn’t get a lot of time over the weekend with events so I did what I could.

Identified Stations:

WWV 10 and 15 MHz (680 mi)
CHU 7.9 and 14.9 MHz (850mi)
WRMI on 17.5-18MHz (1410 mi)
WWCR on ~5.9 MHz (700 mi)
WGN Chicago – 720 kHz (350 mi)
KBGG Des Moines – 1700 kHz (240 mi)
KCNZ Cedar Falls – 1650 kHz (180 mi)
??Radio Exterior de Espana?? – I think so but couldn’t be sure 16m band

Friday evening – all times local CDT in midwest:

41m band – 3 stations – 2 in Spanish, 1 in english (no IDs)
49m band – two religious stations and one hispanic (that was 2-3 kHz above the 2 english stations – no IDs)

Saturday – started a more systematic approach.

really tried hard to hear WWV on 20MHz scanning down a bit from 21MHz FT8 – nothing
pretty sure I got Radio Exterior de Espana – but not sure
hear loud stations in the 31, 25, 22 and 16m bands but only a couple of IDs – noted above
heard a ton of MW stations but only picked out a few with IDs – noted above

Here are some key observations:

1. As a simple portable, the D-220 is a nice, very lightweight travel companion. FM and MW are sufficient for listening to games or music. I would definitely take it on a bike trip or camping or even to a game.
2. Headphone plug on the side??? Why?? Not good for a pocket or case. Should be on the top.
3. Outdoor use is moderate to excellent – performance improves dramatically. MW at night seems very good as does SW. This really is an outdoor portable with just the whip!
4. SW noise level is very good. Much better than Retekess or others.
5. SW overloading from MW is bad in the city yet just touching the whip with a finger removes it completely (changing impedance, grounding and antenna characteristics) allowing for clean SW.
6. FM audio sounds good but bass is severely attenuated. Hooking up the headphone jack to a stereo demonstrates how much low frequencies are cut whereas other cheap portables have great lows.
7. Audio tuning bandwidth drowns out stations close to each other if one is more powerful – fine tuning isn’t an option.
8. Tuning is general takes patience and a very sensitive touch to change the frequency.
9. SW is doable outdoors – need some testing with antenna mods – but the whip would give you some of the big SW guns.

All-in-all I was generally pleased with the radio at its price point and portability.

*****

William, KR8L

MWBC = 5, DX = 130 miles (WSM)
FMBC = 10 , DX = 50 miles (WCIL)
SW SFTS = 3, DX = 900 miles (WWV)
SWBC = 6, DX = 8000 miles (RNZ)
Amateur (CW) = 4, DX = 1010 miles (K1YAN)
Amateur (AM) = 2, DX = 1110 miles (W7YO)

Fun! Heard a lot more but no ID due to language and time constraints.

*****

Lou, KD2UHG (via email)

I could not spent as much time as I would have liked scanning the waves. I was picking up more SW then I imagined possible. Most noteworthy was the Music Through The Decades. From Akron Ohio, and Radio Romania. I heard all of the usual Christian preachers. Brother S was booming from Florida.After receiving the 220, I also bought the 219.

*****

So, thank you Don, William and Lou for your participation and your comments.

I hope William’s observation sums it up for all of you: “Fun!”

Spread the radio love

Special Update to A Nutty Idea XHDATA D-220 DX Contest

30 Replies

Originally, the XHDATA D-220 DX Contest was intended to be on shortwave, but prompted by a question from Dennis, K2DCD, I consulted with Thomas (our Maximum Leader) and he said “I say with a radio this basic, simply go for anything and everything logged.”

That makes sense and sounds like pure, unadulterated DXing pleasure.

So here are the new rules:

You must use a D-220 with native (built-in) antenna (no hooking it up to your two-mile-long Beverage antenna)
No use of other radios or SDRs as “spotter” radios.
You must ID off the air.
Any band the D-220 receives.
Any location.
Contest starts 6 pm your local time on Friday, August 16, 2024 and it ends at 6 pm your local time on Sunday, August 18, 2024.
Log the time, the estimated frequency, the station ID and what you heard.

There are no prizes, just bragging rights.

Feel free to report in lavish detail on your experience during the contest . . . especially if you had fun!

Spread the radio love

A Nutty Idea

16 Replies

By Jock Elliott, KB2GOM

Official Disclaimer: “Yes, XHDATA is a supporter of the SWLing Post but this is my own crazy idea, and we aren’t getting any commissions from the sales. XHDATA doesn’t even know we’re doing it!”

It’s all Robert Gulley’s fault. He had the temerity to post an article about the XHDATA D-220 entitled “A Throwback to a Simpler Time” — I read it, was intrigued, and ordered one.

It arrived today, and, by golly, it actually works. I snapped a couple of AA cells into the battery compartment and discovered immediately that it appears to have a pretty hot FM receiver section. Then I tried medium wave and pulled up several of the local AMers. Then, the acid test: shortwave. Robert Gulley was right: “you will want to turn the dial slowly, very slowly.” But, sonuvagun, if you use a safecracker’s touch, you will actually discover and receive distant shortwave stations on that dinky telescoping whip antenna . . . with an exceedingly inexpensive radio.

So here’s my Nutty Idea: How about an XHDATA D-220 DX contest?

Rules:

You must use a D-220 with native antenna
No use of other radios or SDRs as “spotter” radios.
You must ID off the air.

As Thomas, our Maximum Leader, put it: “It’s so insanely cheap, it’s a great way to have everyone on a level playing field. Well, unless someone gets the yellow version which we all know has special powers.” (Yes, I bought the yellow version.)

Further, I proposed we kick this thing off at 6 pm your local time on Friday, August 16, 2024 and it ends at 6 pm your local time on Sunday, August 18, 2024. You log the time, the estimated frequency, the station ID and what you heard. There are no prizes, just bragging rights. The object: to have fun!

So, whaddya think?

Or should I go back to the home and start taking my meds?

Spread the radio love