Category Archives: How To

Part Two: A Beginner’s Guide to ALE

1 Reply

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Don Moore–noted author, traveler, and DXer–who shares the following post:

A Beginner’s Guide to ALE: Part Two

By Don Moore

Don’s traveling DX stories can be found in his book Tales of a Vagabond DXer [SWLing Post affiliate link]. If you’ve already read his book and enjoyed it, do Don a favor and leave a review on Amazon.

In the first part of this series, I explained what the digital ALE mode is and looked at an easy way to get started monitoring ALE stations. In part three, I’ll look in detail at the dozens of countries and hundreds of stations that can be logged in ALE mode. But first, let’s look at a way to let software do the hard work in adding those hundreds of stations.

The Black Cat Approach

Run by longtime DXer Chris Smolinski, Black Cat Systems is a provider of over two dozen quality software programs for radio hobbyists. The one we’re interested in is the Black Cat ALE Vacuum Cleaner. The name describes exactly what it does. The user feeds it a large number of SDR spectrum recordings, and the Vacuum Cleaner sucks up the ALE DX and lists them in a file.

Let’s step through the basics of using the program. But first, you need at least an hour or two of SDR spectrum recordings covering frequencies with lots of ALE traffic. Some of my favorite ranges are 7500-9200 kHz, 10100-11500 kHz, and 15500-16500 kHz.

Here’s the main screen on the Vacuum Cleaner:

I recommend you check both USB and LSB. In the logs reported to the Utility DXers Forum, about 97% of all ALE transmissions are in USB mode. From my experience, if LSB is unchecked, the Vacuum Cleaner will step through the files about twenty percent faster, but you will miss a tiny number of stations.

The kHz settings determine how finely the application will tune in looking for ALE signals. I recommend just checking x.0kHz and x.5kHz. Almost all ALE signals on shortwave are transmitted on frequencies that end in either point-zero or point-five kilohertz. The main exception is the US Department of State, which uses frequencies ending in point-six kilohertz (e.g., 8058.6 kHz). Fortunately, the one-hundred Hertz difference from the point-five kilohertz setting isn’t enough to make a difference except maybe with the weakest of signals.

The next step is the Settings, which are found under the Edit menu. Most values can be left at the defaults.

At the top, the number of decoding threads should be no more than the number of cores that your CPU has. Check the Auto Log box, then enter a destination path to record logs to a file. (Otherwise, the logs that show up in the window will be gone when you close the program.) Next, select the file format of the SDR program used in making the I/Q recordings. Finally, set the file format for your logs. I prefer the single tab format so that I can later import the logs into Excel and sort by frequency.

Now it’s time to decode. Under the File menu, select Open I/Q Files and browse to a folder of spectrum recordings to decode. Click on Open in the file selection box, and the Vacuum Cleaner will start decoding the files. Now take a break and come back in fifteen or twenty minutes. The main screen should look like this.

The current settings and the frequencies being scanned are displayed at the top, under the settings checkboxes. There are actually only 1232 distinct frequencies in that range, but the number is doubled as each one is being checked in both LSB and USB. Below that, the output window lists each file as it is being scanned and ALE logs as they are found. (But be sure you are also recording these to a text file.)

To see a list of files still in the queue, select File > Show I/Q Files Awaiting Processing. After a few files have been processed, this will also show an estimate of how much time is needed to complete the queue. To add additional files to the queue, select File > Pause Processing, add the files, and then select File > Resume Processing. Note that the Vacuum Cleaner processes files in date/time order. If you add files that were recorded earlier, they will go to the front of the queue.

How Long Does This Take?

In the above image, notice that after each file is finished, the time taken to decode it is displayed. These files were all exactly 326 seconds long, and the first one took 262 seconds to decode for a speed of 1.24x actual time. That may not seem important, but it depends on how much you have to decode. In a couple of days of serious DXing with my three Airspy receivers, I can easily accumulate a couple of terabytes of spectrum recordings.

Processing time depends on several factors. The first is the bandwidth/sampling rate. Those files above were recorded with SDR-Console at 768 kHz wide. All other things being equal, a narrower sample will process faster and a larger one more slowly. Depending on the band being monitored, I sometimes record with my Airspys at the 912 kHz bandwidth. Those typically take about 25% longer to decode than 768 kHz files.

Another factor is whether or not the Vacuum Cleaner has to share processing power with other running applications. That slows things down. I mostly decode overnight or at times when I’m not otherwise using the laptop. Under those conditions, my 768 kHz files decode at 1.75x and my 912 kHz ones at 1.45x. But those numbers are for my nearly four-year-old main laptop. An older laptop I have at home tops out at around 1.40x on 768 kHz files with nothing else running. If you have a high-performance gaming laptop, you should get much better numbers than I.

Then there are differences between the various SDR applications in how they store data. I won’t go into the technical details that Chris explained to me, but SDR-Console is more efficient in this regard. In my own testing, I found that files of similar bandwidth and time length recorded with SDR-Console decode at least fifty percent faster than those recorded with the default Elad and Perseus software. I’m satisfied with SDR-Console, so I haven’t tried any other programs. If you have other favorite SDR applications, I suggest doing some comparison tests to see what works best for you.

One application that you shouldn’t use is HDSDR. Chris didn’t have good documentation on the file format for this one and wasn’t fully successful in reverse-engineering it. The Vacuum Cleaner will work with HDSDR, but almost all the callsigns that it finds will be errors. And that brings us to an important question.

How Accurate Is It?

When I started using the Vacuum Cleaner, my main concern was whether it would miss valid signals. There was only one way to find out, so I ran several tests. I would give the Vacuum Cleaner a few hours of I/Q recordings to decode, and then I would process the same recordings manually using Sorcerer, as described in part one. Black Cat not only correctly identified every single ALE transmission that I found with my eyes but went way beyond that. It also found and decoded weak and noise-covered signals that I couldn’t see in the Data Analyzer window but were there when I played them back.

As Chris points out in his documentation, the emphasis on weak signal detection does cause the application to sometimes falsely report bogus callsigns. Some of these are produced by random noise, fooling the system. Others come from poorly received signals. He could have taken a ‘high confidence’ approach and only presented callsigns that had been clearly received. But that would have meant some valid callsigns not being reported. Instead, he went with displaying everything. It’s up to the user to weed those out.

If the decode doesn’t contain any of the keywords (TO, TIS, and TWAS) then it’s probably an error. But poorly received signals can cause partial and incorrect callsigns to be reported with a keyword. Spotting those just takes the knowledge and practice that comes from using the program and ALE reference materials. (That’s the topic of part three.)

Is It Worth the Price?

Black Cat ALE Vacuum Cleaner is a high-quality software available for Windows and macOS, and you can try it before buying. The cost is $99.99.

Is it worth it? If all you want to do is sample what ALE is all about, then probably not. But if you get serious about ALE monitoring and want to add hundreds of ALE stations to your logbook, this is the way to do it. I am 100% satisfied with the Black Cat ALE Vacuum Cleaner. I’ve decoded several thousand hours of I/Q files with it over the past few years. (When running multiple SDRs at a DXpedition, it’s easy to accumulate seventy or eighty hours per day.) The program also has a few other tricks I haven’t covered. For example, it is possible to actively monitor a folder and decode I/Q recordings as they are created.

In part three of this series, I’m going to take an in-depth look at the countries and stations that can be logged in ALE mode. Once you’ve seen how much DX there is to log, you might just be convinced, like me, that the program is worth the price. And you married guys can tell the wife that you’re buying a new vacuum cleaner that only you will use, hi!

The Vacuum Cleaner isn’t the only program that Chris has for ALE monitoring. Black Cat ALE is a different program that does live monitoring of up to twenty-four ALE frequencies simultaneously with SDR-Console, assuming your laptop has the resources to handle that.

Finally, Chris tells me that he’s been experimenting with using the Vacuum Cleaner with wide-bandwidth I/Q recordings on high-end laptops. On his M4 Max MacBook Pro, he’s able to process 32-MHz wide recordings at about 0.50X real time and 16-MHz wide recordings at about 0.97X real time. As he says, it won’t be long until it will be possible with the right equipment to monitor the entire HF spectrum for ALE signals in real time. And that will be fun!

Links

Part One: A Beginner’s Guide to ALE

8 Replies

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Don Moore–noted author, traveler, and DXer–who shares the following post:

A Beginner’s Guide to ALE: Part One

By Don Moore

Don’s traveling DX stories can be found in his book Tales of a Vagabond DXer [SWLing Post affiliate link]. If you’ve already read his book and enjoyed it, do Don a favor and leave a review on Amazon.

To me, part of the excitement of DXing has always been logging new stations. From the very beginning (over fifty years ago), I went after shortwave broadcast (SWBC), medium wave, and voice utility DX. Up until the mid-90s, I usually averaged logging one new SWBC station per week. Today, it’s hard to add more than one or two each year. There are also far fewer voice utility stations on the air today. At least medium wave is still going strong. Several years ago, my quest for logging new stations on the shortwave frequencies got me involved in DXing digital utility stations. I wrote an article here on monitoring DSC stations: https://swling.com/blog/2022/11/guest-post-monitoring-digital-selective-calling-dcs-with-yadd/).

But DSC is just one of several digital modes that I’ve been playing around with. The one that I’ve found most interesting – and the one that has yielded hundreds of new stations in numerous countries – is ALE.

Now, I am not an expert at monitoring ALE. I’m just an advanced beginner. But I think I know enough to help other beginners get started. And if you are an ALE expert reading this, I welcome your additions, corrections, and even criticisms to the comments section. I still have a lot to learn, too.

What is ALE?

Ever since the early days of radio, one of the most important uses of the shortwave spectrum has been two-way communication. It provides a means for an organization’s far-flung offices or bases to communicate without relying on external infrastructure. That remains true even today because satellites can malfunction and evil powers can cut undersea cables.

But shortwave isn’t consistent. The frequencies that work best between any two points will vary by time of day, time of year, solar conditions, and a host of other factors. In the old days, radio operators had to understand radio propagation to make an educated guess as to the best frequency to use to reach a particular distant station. Sometimes they guessed wrong, and stations would struggle to communicate or maybe not even connect. ALE, or Automatic Link Establishment, was designed to make two-way shortwave communication as simple as making a telephone call. Depending on your point of view, it has taken the guesswork out of frequency selection … or made it so easy that any dummy can be a radio operator.

In an ALE system, each station is assigned a unique identifier and the network has a set of preconfigured frequencies spaced throughout the shortwave spectrum. For example, here’s a partial list of frequencies and stations for the United States Air Force, one of the most active ALE networks.

USAF Common Frequencies: 4721, 5684, 5702, 6715, 6721, 8968, 9025, 11181, 11226, 13215, 15043, 17976, 18003, 23337, 27870 kHz

Most Active USAF Stations

  • ADW Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, USA
  • AED Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska
  • CRO Croughton Air Base, United Kingdom
  • GUA US Air Force Base, Guam
  • HAW Hawthorn Air Force Base, Ascencion Island
  • HIK Hickman Air Force Base, Hawaii
  • ICZ US Air Force Base, Sigonella, Sicily, Italy
  • JDG US Air Force Base, Diego Garcia Island
  • JNR US Air Force Base, Salinas, Puerto Rico
  • JTY US Air Force Base, Tokyo, Japan
  • MCC Beale Air Force Base, California, USA
  • OFF Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, USA
  • PLA Lajes Field, Azores

The key to the system is a piece of software called the ALE controller. At periodic intervals, the ALE controller at a particular station, say PLA, will loop through the frequencies and send a “sounding” out on each one. That’s just a short digital identification burst saying “This is PLA!” Here’s a recording of an ALE sounding.

That’s not the kind of signal that anyone would enjoy listening to all day. Fortunately, no human being has to do that. Instead, all the other controllers in the network are monitoring every frequency and automatically make note of how well PLA is received (or not) on each channel. Now, if someone at Offutt Air Force Base needs to send a message to Lajes, they just go to their ALE controller and enter “PLA.” The system will select the best frequency to use based on the most recent observations. That’s the basic explanation. If you want to understand more, see the links at the bottom.

Monitoring ALE

You can’t DX ALE with your ears. A computer program has to do it for you. There are several hobby programs that do the job, and I’m going to look at two of them. The first one will get you started, and the second one will take your ALE DXing to the top.

I began with Sorcerer, a free program that decodes several dozen digital modes. See the links below for downloading. The program doesn’t need to be installed. Just unzip the file and place the executable in a suitable location. Next, you need an SDR and an SDR application. I prefer SDR-Console for digital work, but any SDR program will work if you can feed the audio into a virtual audio cable. And that’s the other thing you need – a direct audio connection from the audio output of your SDR application to Sorcerer. There are several similar products available, but I recommend VB-Cable. Your first VB-Cable is free, and you only need one to run Sorcerer. If you want to expand, you can buy more VB-Cables later.

Here’s the main window that opens when you start Sorcerer.

The first time you use Sorcerer you will need to connect it to your VB-Cable. On the menu select File then Options. Find the cable under the Soundcard list and save.

Open your SDR application and tune it to 11181 kHz. Set to USB mode with a filter value of around 2.8 kHz. That is one of the most heavily used frequencies by US Air Force bases around the world. Wherever you are, something should be received. Next, set the audio output of your SDR application to go to VB-Cable. In SDR-Console that’s done by a drop-down box under the current frequency. Next, slide the volume level all the way up.

Now go back to Sorcerer and confirm you are getting audio from the SDR application.

Now select Add Decoder from the top menu in Sorcerer. Then select SELCALL on the left side and scroll down and double-click to select MID-STD 188-141A ALE from the options.

That will open a large decoder window, which you can resize as needed.

Now, go get a cup of coffee and come back in about thirty minutes.

Sample Sorcerer Output

Let’s take a look at some sample output from Sorcerer. These loggings were made on 7915 kHz, a frequency used by the Carabineros (National Police) in Chile. First, Sorcerer shows the time and date the decoding was done per the current time on the laptop. If you are monitoring live, those are the correct date and time of the reception.  For the record, I was decoding from SDR spectrum recordings in these examples, so the times and dates are not the real ones. (I got the real ones from the spectrum recordings.) TWS stands for “This Was” and EOM for “End Of Message.” ILLAPEL and TALTAL are the station identifications, which in this case correspond to two Chilean cities. Note that sometimes the end of the ID can be cut off if reception isn’t clear.

These next loggings are from the national police of Colombia on 7560 kHz. Villavicencio is a city east of the Andes, and Sumapaz is a national park in the remote mountains south of Bogotá.

Here is a string of loggings on 7527 kHz, a frequency used by the US Coast Guard and other US government agencies. But here we have a TO, which means someone is trying to call X09. That happens to be a C-27J Spartan, a medium-range surveillance aircraft used by the US Coast Guard. Who’s doing the calling shows up in the final line. TIS (“This Is”) is a variation on TWS. LNT is the identification for CAMSLANT, the big US Coast Guard station in Portsmouth, Virginia.

The Limits of Single Frequency Monitoring

DXing live and monitoring one highly active frequency at a time with Sorcerer makes for a good introduction to ALE. However, if you just stick to monitoring easy frequencies like the USAF ones, you’ll get a lot of logs, but it won’t take long until you feel as if you’ve gotten everything. There are hundreds more ALE frequencies out there, such as the Chilean and Colombian police ones. But those are less active and might only be received at your location when conditions are just right. If you go after those by live monitoring with your SDR parked on a single frequency, you’ll spend a lot of days without getting a single hit.

What is needed is a way to cast a wide net to catch all the activity in a particular band. The idea I came up with was to use the Spectrum Analyzer feature of the SDR-Console program. See my article on this highly useful feature for an understanding of how this works.

Using an Airspy HF+ Discovery, I would make several hours of spectrum recordings and then use the Spectrum Analyzer to visually find the ALE signals. Here’s a string of three long ALE bursts on 7953 kHz and a single weaker one on 7991 kHz. (Some other digital modes look the same on screen.)

I just had to click on a signal to play it into Sorcerer to get the ID. The process worked really well, and I found a lot of stations this way. But it was also tedious and time-consuming. I wanted something better … something that did the hard work for me. That’s what technology is for, right?

Stay tuned for Part Two … 

Links

Giuseppe’s Clever Homebrew Ferrite Antenna for MW and SW Listening

Leave a reply

Screenshot

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Giuseppe Morlè, who writes:

Dear Thomas,
I’m Giuseppe Morlè, IZ0GZW, from Formia in central Italy on the Tyrrhenian Sea.

This is one of my builds from a few years ago: the T Ferrite antenna. It’s a minimal antenna designed mainly for mediumwave, but it also performs well on shortwave.

Inside the tube at the top are two 12 cm ferrite rods with 32 turns of telephone wire wrapped around them—this section is for mediumwave. Then, on the outside of the tube, I added four more turns for shortwave. A variable capacitor of about 1000 pF completes the circuit.

Shortwave is activated with an alligator clip. When the clip is removed, only the mediumwave section is active.

I tested this antenna with my old Trio 9R-59DS from the 1970s—a tube receiver still in perfect condition. To my pleasant surprise, the receiver paired beautifully with the antenna.

These tests were done on mediumwave in the early afternoon yesterday while it was still light outside. With the antenna placed above the receiver inside my shack, I was able to receive stations from across the Mediterranean basin and Eastern Europe, even in areas where the sun had already set. I really enjoy testing this antenna before evening, and I’m very satisfied with its performance.

You can see the results in this video on my YouTube channel:

I hope this will be of interest to the friends in the SWLing Post community.

Best regards to you and to all,
Giuseppe Morlè, IZ0GZW

We always enjoy checking out your homebrew antenna designs, Giuseppe! Thank you!

Meeting WavViewDX Developer Reinhard Weiß, and Visiting Akihabara With Him (A Totsuka DXers Circle Article by Kazu Gosui)

Leave a reply

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Nick Hall-Patch, who has kindly provided a translation of this article from the Japanese-language publication PROPAGATION by the Totsuka DXers Circle (TDXC). Here, Kazu Gosui recounts his meeting with WavViewDX developer Reinhard Weiß during his visit to Tokyo .

Meeting WavViewDX developer Reinhard Weiß, and Visting Akihabara With Him

by Kazu Gosui

I first learned about WavViewDX in January of this year on the mailing list of the American radio club IRCA. It was described as “analysis software compatible with I/Q WAV recordings created with almost all SDR software,” so I was intrigued. I quickly downloaded it and tried it out, and I was immediately impressed.

In early February, I emailed the developer, asking, “I’m amazed at how easy it is to use and how powerful it is. It works fine with PERSEUS and AirSpy HF+, but are there any plans to support WiNRADiO’s DDC format?” Reinhard Weiß (hereafter referred to as Reinhard) responded that same day, “I’m actually currently working on adding support for WiNRADiO’s G33DDC. I should be able to send you a test version tomorrow.” The email carefully explained the import procedure and important points to note.

The text, the web page description, and the tone of the expression conveyed a sincere and attentive personality. The next day, I tried out the sample version and reported some concerns. Reinhard quickly fixed them, and where he couldn’t immediately fix them, he supported me by sending files via the cloud or screen capture videos. As I continued to request things like adding a shortcut for switching receive modes, I gradually became fascinated with WavViewDX and, before I knew it, became a heavy user.

The first email also asked, “I’m planning to visit Japan in May or June. Are there any ham or BCL (Broadcast Listener; SWL) events in Japan around that time?” In response, I suggested that if Reinhard could come to Tokyo, we could hold an offline meeting with members of TDXC! Through our exchange, I realized that Reinhard is quite knowledgeable about Japanese affairs. He knows Akihabara very well, and even knows Hard Off as a good place to get BCL radios. He loves hot springs and enjoys talking about Japanese food. When I asked him, “Is your wife Japanese by any chance?” he replied, “Yes.” No wonder he’s so knowledgeable! He should have told me sooner! (lol) So, we made an appointment for an offline meeting in Akihabara, Tokyo, in late May.

On the day, we met at the Electric Town exit of JR Akihabara Station. Our four attendees were Hiroo Nakagawa, Satoshi Miyauchi, Fumiaki Minematsu and myself. When I arrived at the meeting point five minutes early, they were already there. When I asked him, “Excuse me, Reinhard-san?” he replied, “Yes, that’s right,” in Japanese. His Japanese was fluent! Up until now, emails had been in English, as I don’t speak German, so I had no choice but to communicate in English… I was completely surprised because I had been counting on the others and Google Translate on my smartphone to converse in English! You should have told me sooner, Reinhard! (lol) Needless to say, from then on, the entire conversation was in Japanese. The meeting venue was a pub near the station. He could read the Japanese menu, and thanks to his wife, who is apparently a good cook, Japanese food was also OK, so no problem.

We spoke about radio and BCL. Reinhard started medium wave DX about three years ago.  He has been interested in radio since he was a child and actually worked as a BCL radio broadcaster. He has had a long career. His job is developing debuggers for testing and verifying the operation of in-vehicle electronic devices and measuring instruments. He says that both his work and his hobby are focused on developing easy-to-use hardware and software integration. He developed WavViewDX while studying the programming language Python, and runs it at home using two PERSEUS devices.

He said he would be happy if many people use it. Currently, WavViewDX has 200 users, 25 of whom are active worldwide. Incidentally, the mailing list has 102 subscribers (as of June 10, 2025).

Over lunch, we had the opportunity to use WavViewDX on the PC we brought with us, and it was extremely valuable to have the developer himself explain how to use it, provide an overview of its functions, and explain the development concept.  We also received copies of the German BCL magazine “Radio-Kurier” (a radio delivery service?). This magazine apparently publishes an astounding 2,000 copies per month, demonstrating the depth of Germany’s BCL population. The most active BCLs are few, and 80% of the articles are written by one person. That’s impressive.

The second half of the meeting was a tour of Akihabara’s famous shops. We visited the Radio Center rental showcase, Uchida Radio, Radio Department Store, Rocket, Fuji Musen, and Akizuki Denshi. Reinhard has a keen interest in vintage Japanese BCL radios and boomboxes, and his eyes lit up as he looked at rare radios and boomboxes. At Uchida Radio, he even negotiated the price of a radio cassette player he was interested in.    Unfortunately, the deal fell through, but he apparently toured Hard Off stores around Tokyo the next day, so he must be a die-hard enthusiast. He also seemed to love the Fuji Wireless and Akizuki Electronics stores on the second floor, saying, “Their unique products are what keeps them going, and I can see why they’ve survived.” He bought a large breadboard (brand new!) for 50 yen on the second floor of Akizuki and then we took a break for tea in the cafe.

We had a great time chatting there, too. Reinhard is, in a word, a nice guy. A German who speaks Japanese, loves radio and BCL, and develops software for BCL—an extremely rare and valuable person. He’s fluent enough in Japanese to even tell jokes, and he’d laugh along with us at our old-man jokes. He was friendly and fun to talk to, and we shared the same values as fellow enthusiasts. It felt like we were old friends.

He apparently returns to Japan every year with his wife, but he hasn’t done a DX expedition yet. Maybe the next one will be the Chigasaki expedition?! So we parted ways, hoping to see each other again next year.

(l-r: Kazu Gosui, Satoshi Miyauchi, Hiroo Nakagawa, Reinhard Weiß, Fumiaki Minematsu) —Hiroo Nakagawa photo

(l-r: Kazu Gosui, Hiroo Nakagawa, Reinhard Weiß, Satoshi Miyauchi) —Fumiaki Minematsu photo

These English translations were prepared for IRCA’s DX Monitor, and are used with the kind permission of  IRCA as well as of the authors and the editor of the Totsuka DXers Circle publication, PROPAGATION.

Ultra Convenient, The Benefits of WavViewDX: Visualizing Reception Conditions (A Totsuka DXers Circle Article by Satoshi Miyauchi)

1 Reply

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Nick Hall-Patch, who has kindly provided a translation of this article from the Japanese-language publication PROPAGATION by the Totsuka DXers Circle (TDXC). In this piece, Satoshi Miyauchi explores how WavViewDX can revolutionize SDR analysis by making propagation and reception conditions instantly visible–and shares some remarkable reception examples.

“Ultra” Convenient, The Benefits of WavViewDX: Visualizing Reception Conditions 

by Satoshi Miyauchi

After recording bands using SDR’s such as Perseus or HF Discovery, I was informed by Kazu Gosui via email of a new program that’s “ultra” convenient for analyzing them. When monitoring in real time with Perseus, I have a general memory and notes of what was received at what time.  However, when recording reception data without real-time monitoring, such as during nighttime hours, verifying and analyzing the data across all frequencies takes time. Knowledge and intuition about where to listen are also important elements. While all of this is a skill, I believe that previous tools have been unable to provide a comprehensive view of the day’s conditions. Since I started using WavViewDX, I’ve been using it every morning, efficiently analyzing the SDR recordings I’ve collected.

By the way, recently I’ve been using a timer (the “Scheduler” of SDR Console) to check if the TWR-Africa signal transmitted from Benin, West Africa, is reaching me in the middle of the night. My analysis showed a significant reduction in the time required for confirmation that TWR-Africa was being received before and after WavViewDX was installed, and I’d like to share this with you.

Just to be clear, this article is not intended to be a tedious rehash of the user manual. Rather, it is intended to provide useful, pinpointed tips for use.

  1. I’ll introduce a method I think might be best based on my current setup.
  2. I’ll share some reception reports from my recent morning routine.
  3. I’ll touch on the mysteries of radio wave propagation, a realization I believe is unique to WavViewDX.

But first, a word about WavViewDX: seeing is believing. As shown in the sample image in Figure 5, it visually displays the status of stations received at each frequency, using green bars or white lines, in chronological order, from the lowest frequency band (left) to the highest (right). You can even customize it to analyze North and South America at 10 kHz intervals for TP reception.

The author is Reinhard Weiß from Germany (please see accompanying related articles).  It is an incredibly easy-to-use and intuitive software. Once you start using it, you’ll definitely want to keep it.

Figure 5

First, let’s assume you’ll be importing and analyzing data into WavViewDX.

1.) Timer Reception Tips, Using SDR Console

This is a backward-thinking approach based on the fact that WavViewDX can import files in “folders.” The golden rule is simply to store all files from a single session in a single folder. I’ve been using SDR Console as my primary SDR program for a while now, so when I register a scheduler (for timer scheduling), I click “Add date (yyyy-mm-dd) subfolder” under “Folder”, in Figure 6. This allows me to import the entire folder of recording files from that day into WavViewDX, saving me a lot of time. WavViewDX has a “Select Whole Folder” button, which allows me to import files into WavViewDX with a single click (Figure 7). How amazing! Incidentally, I set up bandwidth recording files to be stored in separate 1GB files. The moment I wake up, the files are instantly imported into WavViewDX, allowing me to quickly check the conditions from midnight to dawn before work.

Figure 6

Figure 7

2) TWR-Africa Reception Recording

Even on shortwave, it’s rare to see signals from Africa, let alone on mediumwave. Until a few years ago, I thought this was impossible. However, I discovered that I could record pre-dawn signals from Africa on my home K9AY loop, including the VOA of the Sao Tome and Principe relay on 1530kHz, as well as the famous TWR Africa (Benin) on 1476kHz. Of course, it’s not easy to receive signals every day, so I was not motivated to record them regularly However, after installing WavViewDX, I was able to easily grasp the pre-dawn conditions, and I set up a scheduler to record as many times as possible every day.

Then, one morning, right around 3:30 AM, on the morning of the March vernal equinox, I noticed a very clear bar on the 1476kHz using WavViewDX (Figure 8). By working in conjunction with WavViewDX, it automatically checks offsets in exact carrier frequency being received against the MWList database, and the > mark quickly lights up in WavViewDX, indicating that it’s TWR Africa! I was surprised when I heard the audio. I was impressed by the exceptionally clear reception. There was a slight beat, and it seemed like at least one other carrier was also in the mix. How such clear audio managed to reach and be heard across nearly 13,300 km as the crow flies is a mystery, but it’s still a moving experience.

Figure 8

I asked @lft_kashima LFT Kashima Fishing Radio, who regularly posts information on X, and he said that the signal wasn’t as good on that day at his location. Since we’re both in the Kanto region and a little farther apart, perhaps that’s the problem, or perhaps it’s just the antenna. He uses a north-south loop antenna, while I use a vertical AOR SA-7000.

While I don’t know the full reason or answer, one possible guess: – Wasn’t the arrival direction north-south? – Did it arrive through a duct somewhere? However, there’s no way to know why the duct ended up at this receiving point. It’s a wonder that I was able to receive such a DX station at this point in the solar cycle, when the number of sunspots is almost at its maximum and the A/K Index was far from calm. This makes daily reception all the more meaningful. It’s a moment that makes me admire nature, the work of radio wave propagation.  I was able to receive this station again in April, and the links to those two results from 1476kHz – TWR Africa are below:

3) The Mysteries of Radio Wave Propagation Discovered Only with WavViewDX

WaveViewDX already clearly shows the reception status on the vertical time axis, but just before the vernal equinox, a phenomenon in which the propagation conditions deteriorated simultaneously across multiple frequencies occurred, albeit for a short period of time. (Audio Sample https://youtu.be/XhXSQFiGQeo) What is this? Figure 9 shows the actual situation at my location on March 17, 2025, after 18:00 UTC.

Figure 9

  1. 1278kHz JOFR Fukuoka RKB Mainichi Broadcasting System 50kw (about 900km distance, 245°)
  2. 1287kHz JOHR Sapporo HBC Hokkaido Broadcasting System 50kw (about 1000km distance, 340°)
  3. 1332kHz JOSF Nagoya Tokai Broadcasting System 50kw (about 270km distance, 270°)

(*Note: The leftmost bar (1242kHz in the Kanto region) is attenuated with a notch filter)

One of the benefits of WavViewDX is that it visually showed the simultaneous drop in signal strength from domestic and international stations, which had been arriving almost smoothly until 18:00 UTC.

I asked Perplexity AI and searched the literature. These possibilities were listed:

“Regarding the phenomenon of simultaneous attenuation of radio signals in all directions for several minutes during nighttime propagation in the medium frequency band (MF band),” it is believed to be primarily caused by the combined effects of the following factors: –

  • Ionospheric Variation Mechanism Sudden E-Layer (Es-Layer) Formation A localized increase in electron density in the upper E-layer of the ionosphere (at an altitude of 100-120 km) at night. This thin ionosphere strongly reflects signals, blocking the normal F-layer reflection path. One measurement data showed signal attenuation of up to 20 dB when the Es layer occurred.
  • F-layer altitude fluctuations: When the F layer (altitude 250-400 km), the main nighttime propagation path, rapidly rises due to thermal expansion, the reflection angle changes, creating a “propagation hole” that causes signals to deviate from the receiving point.
  • Earth’s magnetic field fluctuations disrupt the electron distribution in the ionosphere, causing a sudden increase in absorption.
  • Instantaneous changes in solar activity: The emission of X-rays and charged particles associated with solar flares suddenly changes the electron density in the ionosphere, destabilizing the reflection coefficient and resulting in short-term propagation loss.

Although it was able to provide various possible explanations, I was unable to perform any further verification of these answers myself.

These English translations were prepared for IRCA’s DX Monitor, and are used with the kind permission of  IRCA as well as of the authors and the editor of the Totsuka DXers Circle publication, PROPAGATION.

An Introduction to WavViewDX SDR Playback Software (A Totsuka DXers Circle Article by Kazu Gosui)

6 Replies

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Nick Hall-Patch, who has kindly provided a translation of this article from the Japanese-language publication PROPAGATION by the Totsuka DXers Circle (TDXC). In this piece, Kazu Gosui introduces WavViewDX, an impressive SDR file playback and analysis tool developed by Reinhard Weiß of Germany.

About WavViewDX, SDR File Playback Software

by Kazu Gosui

Introduction

“WavViewDX,” developed by Reinhard Weiß of Germany, is SDR file playback software. It maps the received signals from SDR-recorded files into bar graphs, with time on the vertical axis and frequency (channel) on the horizontal axis, for each of the following channel separations: medium wave (9/10 kHz), short wave (5 kHz), and FM (50/100 kHz).  Clicking the cursor (blue crosshair) plays the received audio. By “visualizing the received signal” through mapping (see also the separate article by Satoshi Miyauchi), you can see at a glance the start and end times of broadcasts, fade in, fade out, channels you should listen to, and channels you don’t need to listen to.

Basic Usage and Screen Description

First, download and install WavViewDX from the WavViewDX webpage (https://rweiss.de/dxer/tools.html). The latest version is version was 1544 as of June 8, 2025, when this was written, but version 1662 is available in October 2025. When you launch WavViewDX, the Main Window (Figure 1) will appear, showing Analysis View, the Operation/Settings Panel, Logbook and Database.

Figure 1

To play back recorded files, you must import them. Click Import to display the Import SDR Recording settings screen. Source files can be selected as single or multiple files, or by folder. Set the reception location, time, channel separation, etc., and begin importing. A progress percentage will appear, and green and white bar graphs will appear on the Analysis View screen. Hovering the cursor over a bar graph and clicking will display a red circle, and the audio recorded for that channel and time will play. Scrolling the mouse will allow you to zoom in and out of the Analysis View.

When you import, a WVD format file is created. Once you’ve imported the files, you can simply load the corresponding WVD file at another time, and the files will be available to play immediately.

In addition to Import and Load, the following settings are available at the top of the Main Window.

  • Analysis: Allows you to select the file/folder and frequency separation when importing.
  • Carrier Views: Displays offset frequencies to identify and estimate the received medium wave station.
  • Database: Links with the MWLIST webpage (https://www.mwlist.org/ul_login.php) to identify and estimate the received medium wave station.
  • Logbook: For documenting stations heard, along with creation of audio recordings during playback.
  • More: Allows you to set multiple options, such as manual tuning and contrast setting.
  • Setup: Allows you to set the sound device and select the file format for recording audio clips during playback.
  • About: Allows you to select the software version, Help, etc.

The Main Window also displays the frequency list linked to the aforementioned Database and the Logbook.  The database frequency list can be selected by region, such as Europe or East Asia. The Logbook allows you to record reception records and associate recorded audio files.

The right side of the Main Window contains the operation and settings panel. At the top are the Frequency Display and Spectrum View. Hovering the cursor over Spectrum View allows you to select PBT (Pass Band Tuning) and NOTCH.

Below these are:

  • Spectrum Zoom (x1, x2, x4), which expands the spectrum;
  • Bandpass Bandwidth Presets ([2.5] etc.), which change the reception bandwidth;
  • Player Time Controls (Play/Pause; -30s etc.), which control the playback time;
  • Carrier View, which displays the offset frequency; (+/- 30Hz, and can be shifted above and below the nominal .000 frequency)
  • Demodulator Modes, which change the reception mode.

(Keyboard shortcuts are available for the above functions.)

  • The AF Highpass Filter adjusts the audio frequency passband to improve intelligibility.
  • The Spike Filter reduces popping during reception.
  • Phasing combines two synchronized recording files to reduce same-frequency interference and noise.
  • NCE (Neighbor Channel Eliminator) reduces interference from adjacent channels.
  • Binaural allows you to select the sideband of the AF output during playback.
  • The AF Audio Recorder allows you to record by clicking during playback. Recording formats include WAV, FLAC, and MP3.

As you can see, there are so many features it’s impossible to introduce them all. Detailed adjustments to each function make it even easier to use; it may seem tedious at first, but give the features a try. The user interface is intuitive, so you’ll quickly get used to it. If you’re unsure how to use something, just press the F1 key and refer to the Help.

Actual Usage 

Let’s try it out. The import settings are set to MW 9+10kHz Channel Analysis Configuration. Configuration, and other settings are set to default. (editor’s note:  “SDR Calibration” allows the use of reference carrier frequencies in the data, for those SDRs without a frequency standard, so that each carrier frequency in the passband will be displayed accurately.)   Once the import is complete, a bar graph will appear. Figures 2 and 3 show the analysis view of the actual file import from early May 2025, during the Hachijojima DXpedition showing evening reception; time is UTC.

Figure 2

Figure 3

9kHz separation is used in Figure 2. You can hear the audio from 630kHz at the time indicated by a circle. Black areas of the bar graph indicate no signal, while white to green indicates good signal reception. If you miss an ID during reception, press the up arrow key to rewind the time by 5 seconds and listen again.   Click Recording to record the ID.

As you can see, the bar graph color changes from black to white and then white to green over time. This indicates that as the day turns from daytime to evening and then nighttime, channels that previously had no reception begin to receive broadcasts. Sunset on this day was 9:29 UTC (18:29 JST), and the received signal fade in was between 8:30 UTC (17:30 JST) and 9:15 UTC (18:15 JST).

Next, click Analysis and switch to MW 10kHz channel analysis. The Analysis View after switching is shown in Figure 3. This shows the reception status with 10kHz separation. Most channels are black, with a few white spots. There is very little green. In this image, there are certainly no 10kHz channels with good audio, but by clicking on the white, we can see some with faint English talk and music. I checked the database and found that these channels appear to be Hawaiian stations (see orange circle marks in Figure 3) that have been active since around 8:30 UTC.

Also, Latin music was heard on 1230 kHz (Orange circle in Figure 3). This may be Radio Dos from Argentina. By visualizing reception status like this, I was able to determine where to listen and where not to listen. During the Hachijojima expedition in May, I was blessed with outstanding reception conditions from the evening through the early morning hours of the following day, and was able to track 187 overseas medium wave stations, including 165 in Australia, 5 in New Zealand, 2 in Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Marshall Islands, Kiribati, Palau, Fiji, Tuvalu, Indonesia, and the Philippines, achieving significant results. Playback and analysis took about a week, which was shorter than usual, thanks to WavViewDX.

Summary 

As mentioned above, WavViewDX has proven to be an efficient tool for analysis, allowing users to discover previously unnoticed stations. Since it can play files recorded with various SDRs, we hope that many DXers will use it. WavViewDX is compatible with multiple PC operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, and is freeware. According to Reinhard Weiß, additional features and enhancements are planned for the future, so we look forward to seeing its future developments. Finally, we would like to express our gratitude and respect to Reinhard Weiß for developing such useful and excellent software.

Reference Materials 

Table 1. Supported IQ Formats

ELAD FDM-SW2 Generic RAW recordings
GQRX recordings HDSDR
Jaguar Linrad RAW, single and dual-channel
recordings PERSEUS (*.wav)
PERSEUS P22 (*.P22) SDR#
SDR Console SDR Uno
SDRconnect SpectraVue
WiNRADiO DDC WiNRADiO RXW (only for G33)
Winrad

Trying WavViewDX on FM 

WavViewDX is primarily geared toward medium wave DX, but it seems like it can be used for FM DX as well. The image in Figure 4 shows reception from 79-87MHz using an RSPdx-R2 and an indoor YouTwin antenna. It supports stereo and has good audio quality. With an outdoor antenna, it could also be used for FM DX, such as with sporadic E and other short-lived propagation enhancements.

Figure 4

These English translations were prepared for IRCA’s DX Monitor, and are used with the kind permission of  IRCA as well as of the authors and the editor of the Totsuka DXers Circle publication, PROPAGATION.

Taming the Noise: Don Moore’s Simple, Cheap Filter Solution for Traveling DXers

5 Replies

Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor Don Moore–noted author, traveler, and DXer–who shares the following post:

A Cheap and Simple Noise Filter

By Don Moore

Don’s traveling DX stories can be found in his book Tales of a Vagabond DXer [SWLing Post affiliate link]. If you’ve already read his book and enjoyed it, do Don a favor and leave a review on Amazon.

My DXing career started over fifty years ago in an upstairs bedroom in tiny Milesburg, Pennsylvania. I had a consumer-grade multi-band radio and some copper wire strung from the roof to a nearby tree.  It was a simple setup but it worked very well. Do you know what I didn’t have? A noise problem. The only time I remember noise ruining my DX was when my mother was using the electric mixer and that meant she was making cookies or a cake. I never complained.

Times have changed, haven’t they? What DXer doesn’t complain about noise these days? I know people who have left the hobby because the place they lived at and DXed at for decades gradually became so noisy they couldn’t DX anymore.

Unsurprisingly, a lot has been written about how to find and eliminate noise in your home. However, most of my DXing is done as I wander the globe. I try to find places to stay at that should be good for DXing. But no matter how good a place looks beforehand, there’s no way of knowing what the noise level will be until I get there.

As a traveling DXer, I need quick, easy, and compact noise solutions. The best solution I’ve found are these CCTV distortion filters (ground loop isolators) that Brett Saylor recommended to me several years ago.

No, these weren’t designed for radio use. And they aren’t a miracle solution that will eliminate all the noise that plagues DXers. Sometimes they’re no use at all. But I’ve DXed in dozens of locations over the past ten years and there have been multiple occasions where one of these filters has turned what would have been a disappointing stay into a good DX session. I don’t go anywhere without two of these packed in my mobile DX shack.

But let me show you some results. All of these SDR screenshots were made with SDR-Console using an Airspy HF+ Discovery SDR connected to a PA0RDT mini-whip antenna.

I spent last summer in the north suburbs of Chicago and several times went to a park to test my DX equipment. Around midday, the lower shortwave frequencies were filled with noise peaks. On this first image, it’s hard to pick out WWV on 5 MHz from all the noise peaks. In the second image the filter hasn’t totally eliminated the noise, but WWV’s signal is now strong and clear.

The noise was nearly as strong on 49 meters but the filter almost totally eliminated it. CFRX’s signal on 6070 kHz was slightly weaker with the filter, but it was significantly more listenable without the noise.

Which frequencies noise affects can vary between locations. At that park the noise was gone above about 11 MHz.  While traveling across the US in mid-October, I stopped at a park just west of Kansas City to do some more DXing and equipment tests.  The noise there was bad in the middle shortwave bands, such as in the 25 meter band.

But the filter did a good job cleaning it up.

Finally, about two years ago when I was DXing in Rafina, Greece, the noise was bad on the higher bands. Here are before and after screen shots on the 16-meter band.

These filters should work with any coax-fed antenna. I’ve used them with beverages, Wellbrook loops, the PA0RDT, and the MLA-30+ loop. If the antenna has an interface, such as the last three mentioned, the filter goes between the interface and your receiver (and not between the interface and the antenna).  I’m not sure what the impedance on these is, but I’ve used them with both 50- and 75-ohm coax cable.

Sources of the Filters

An Internet search for “CCTV Ground Loop Isolator” brings up all kinds of products. They are probably all the same but I have no way of knowing that. So I recommend getting the exact ones that I have purchased. Just compare the product to the pictures of mine.

Here are links to three current sources for these exact ones on Amazon. They can also be found on eBay and other sites. [Note that all of these links are affilliate links that support the SWLing Post at no cost to you.]

A Few More Ideas

At just a couple dollars each, every DXer should have a few of these filters in their shack. But types of noise vary and at several places I’ve DXed from using one of these filters made no difference at all. When that happens I have a few other solutions to try.

The first thing I try is to either move the antenna or, if it’s directional, to point it in a different direction. On several occasions that’s all it has taken to totally eliminate what at first seemed like an impossible noise problem.

If the noise is coming in through the power lines, unplugging the laptop and DXing off of battery power might do it. (I only use SDRs powered off the USB connections on my laptop.)  If you do that, be sure to unplug the cord from the outlet and move it away from the wall.  If you unplug the cord from the laptop and leave the other end plugged into the outlet, it may act as an antenna and radiate the noise from the power lines into your SDR. And, yes, I learned that lesson the hard way!

Do you have any interesting experiences or solutions to the DX noise problem? Please leave them in the comments section.